365bet

Vratas depicted in the Gangajala (study)

by Maitreyee Goswami | 2018 | 55,000 words

This page relates ‘post-Pitambara Siddhantavagisha period� of the study dealing with the Vratas (vows) depicted in the Gangajala—a Smriti-Nibandha, i.e., a text belonging to the Kamarupa School of Dharma-shastra literature which deals with social topics, religious rites and local traditions. The term Vrata refers to ritual vows aimed at spiritual and moral purification. This essay explores its socio-religious implications reflecting medieval Assam.

Go directly to: Footnotes.

Part 4.3 - The post-ī峾 Siddhāntavāgiśa period

[Full title: The schools of ٳ󲹰śٰ with particular reference to Kamarupa school of Dharma-shastra (3) The post-ī峾 Siddhāntavāgiśa period]

During this period under discussion, the two great digest writers of Kamarupa School of Dharmashastra were 龱ñᲹⲹ Bhaṭṭachārya and M.M. Śambhunāth Siddhāntavāgīśa. 龱ñᲹⲹ wrote a big treatise entitled ʳܰṇaԻ in two parts following his predecessors of the Kamarupa School of Dharmashastra Śambhunāth under the patronage of king Dharmadeva (Koch Behar) wrote twelve . That he averted the advent of Բⲹٲ of the Bengal School in his works can be learnt from the observation of Prof.

Naliniranjan Sharma ٳܲ�

‘Śaܲٳ Ѿś raised strong and scholarly objections to the neo-theory (Navyamata) propounded by the ٲ Bhaṭṭāchārya (Raghunandan) of Bengal and has advocated the old theory� (Prācīnamāta).[1]

Kṛṣṇarāma Nyāyavāgīśa Bhaṭṭachārya popularly known as �Parvatīyā Gosain� availed the opportunity of becoming the �Ჹܰ� of the Ahom king. He occupied the prominent place at the behest of King Rudra ṃh (1695-1714 CE) and from that time onwards till the beginning of the period of Lakṣhmī ṃh (1769-1780 CE) he could assert his undisputed supremacy in the matters of religion in Ahom kingdom. Although Lakṣhmī ṃh dismissed Kṛṣṇarāma from the position he was enjoying so long and settled Ramānanda Bhaṭṭāchārya, known as ‘Na-gosain� and ‘Pahumarīyā Gosāin� also in his vacant position, yet the deep rooted impact of Բⲹṛt that Kṛṣṇarāma planted firmly in the kingdom almost remained unabated in many places. It was not only in practice in upper Assam centering round Gargāon, but also spread over some of the parts of lower Assam. Centering round Nilācala Hill or was the place of Kṛṣṇarāma initially allotted to him by the royal order of King Rudra ṃh. It was Kṛṣṇarāma by dint of the royal patronage that he ventured to neglect the 峦īԲ pūjā vidhi pertaining to the worship of ٳܰ, the mother Goddess and replaced them by composing of his own in the light of Բⲹṛt. His ٳܰrccāmaṇimañjarī is an example in this respect.[2] It is learnt that at his inspiration a good number of 󳾲ṇa were asked to get initiated to this school to run the worship of the deities. In matters of establishment and propagation of the neoschool in Assam, Kṛṣṇarāma’s position could be assessed only from the land grants he received from the donor kings beginning from Śivasiṃha.

In the words of Amalendu Guha

The family of Parbatīā Goswami possessed as much as 41000 acres of land, spread over 31 mauzas. It was estimated in 1883 A.D., that Parbatīā Goswami and the Mādhav Debālaya between them accounted for no less than a thousand ryots�.[3]

Later, they came into contact with the ٲ貹Ի徱ٲ of Bengal and at the same time received Devottara land to run the religious institutions from the kings. It inspired many 󳾲ṇa of 峾ū貹 to embrace new-School.

From the above analysis it can be concluded that, in the Pre-Pitambara period Kamarupa School of Dharmashastra was precisely known as �ʰ峦īԲṛt�, �ʰ峦īԲٲ� and �峦īԲkāmarūpīa-ⲹٳ-ⲹī�. During the ʾ峾 period ٲ貹Ի徱ٲ Raghunandana germinated the seed of ⲹṛt in this region. It remained insignificant till the coming of Kṛṣnarāma to Assam in the post ī峾 period i.e., in the first quarter of the 17th century CE. It was Kṛṣṇarāma Nyāyavagīśa Bhaṭṭācārya who could considerably establish the new-school i.e., ⲹṛt of Bengal in medieval ancient Assam almost parallel to ʰ峦īԲṼ۳ī of 峾ū貹.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

(a) Sharma, N.R., 峾ū貹 School of ٳ󲹰śٰ, pp.133-134

[2]:

Goswami, B.K.D., Descriptive Catalogue of Sanskrit Manuscript, Sl.no.249, p.65

[3]:

Plant-Raj to Swaraj, p.49

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: