365bet娱乐

As a result of the studies undertaken by colonial historians and writers on Indology, India is branded as the land of spirituality and homogenized culture. According to such a notion, the supreme aim of life was believed to be 惭辞办峁�a, the attainment of the ultimate liberation. It is obvious that such a Eurocentric view entirely expels the polyphonic nature of Indian culture. This view gained momentum during the colonial phase in Indian context. They divide the East and the West as the matrix of spirituality and materialism respectively. In other words, they observe that East stands for the state of inertia and the indisposition of spirituality and as a symbol of static culture; and the West is proclaimed as the centre of mighty dynamic way of life based on the well-being of all by means of materialism. Indian philosophers like S. Radhakrishnan also support that the schools of Indian thought are basically spiritual in nature.

But the history of Indian tradition reveals a strong foundation of materialism. It also illustrates the endless quest of the mind, ever old, ever new. There is a significant stream of metaphysics also in Indian Philosophical thought which has been traditionally pre-occupied over the questions of the nature of Godhead, the end of life and the relation of the individual to the universal soul. It was believed that the Trivarga or the three goals of human life viz; Dharma Artha and 碍腻尘补 lead one to the path of 惭辞办峁�a. The 础谤迟丑补艣腻蝉迟谤补 puts forward the view that Trivarga is closely connected with each other. Disturbance to any one of the group will affect the other two also and the entire cycle. Here arises a question: What are the 笔耻谤耻峁Ｄ乺迟丑补蝉? Generally, Dharma stands for social and moral obligations and fulfillments of duties as prescribed in the law books designated as 顿丑补谤尘补艣腻蝉迟谤补蝉. Artha includes all the means of livelihood and material prosperity. Among the three, 碍腻尘补 occupies less prominence. Ancient Indian seers sometimes define 碍腻尘补 as love, path of liberation or the basis of the cycle of creation.

Nobody has tried to define 碍腻尘补 as mere sexuality. A number of texts have been written in the field of 碍腻尘补. It gives consolation that with its materialistic overtones, 碍腻尘补s奴tra did not face the deadly situation of the 濒辞办腻测补迟补 texts because of the belief that 碍腻尘补 also leads to the path of 惭辞办峁�a. Even then, Indian philosophical systems do not view 碍腻尘补 in high esteem. The octopus grip of spirituality based on the four-fold 惫补谤峁嘺 system is one of the main reasons for the negligence meted out to the 笔耻谤耻峁Ｄ乺迟丑补 called 碍腻尘补.