365bet

The concept of Mind in the Major Upanishads

by Gisha K. Narayanan | 2018 | 35,220 words

This page relates ‘The Date and Number of the Upanishads� of the study on the concept of Mind as found in the Major Upanishads: the philosophical backbone of the four Vedas. This study explores the various characteristics and psychological aspects of the mind (described by the Seers of ancient India thousands of years ago) including awareness (samjna), understanding (vijnana) and knowledge (prajnana).

Go directly to: Footnotes.

The date, number and chronological order of the 貹Ծṣa are uncertain. S.N. Dasgupta opines that they were constructed by 500 B.C.[1] Dr. S. Radhakrishnan points out that the Ups. were written before the rise of Buddhism i.e., 600 B.C.[2] According to R.D. Ranade ‘the 貹Ծṣaic age has been placed somewhere between 1200B.C.and 600B.C., and it becomes necessary to distribute the 貹Ծṣaic literature into chronological periods within the general limits that have been so fixed�.[3] The 貹Ծṣaic age can be determined by the language, the style, the vocabulary etc; but this cannot be the final word.

The number of 貹Ծṣa is quite large; some of them are not quite old as the others. According to the Indian tradition, ѳܰپDZ貹Ծṣa has arranged all the names of the 108 Ups. All of them are not of equal importance and authority. Among them ten 貹Ծṣa are reckoned as the important and authoritative ones. These are generally categorized as the major 貹Ծṣa since the passages from them are extensively employed by 岹ⲹṇa in framing the ձԳٲūٰ and also by the three principal commentators on Vedanta, viz., Ś԰첹, Rāmanuja and Madhva in their ṣy. These are Īśa, Kena, , ʰśԲ, ѳṇḍ첹, ṇḍūⲹ, Aitareya, ղٳپīⲹ, Bṛhadāraṇyaka and Chāndogya 貹Ծṣa.[4] These ten 貹Ծṣa are called Daśopaniṣads and they can be regarded as ancient and genuine.

ѳܰپDZ貹Ծṣa refers to 岹śDZ貹Ծṣa岹� 貹ṻ[5] and it says mainly ten 貹Ծṣa.

īśԲ첹ṻśԲṇḍṇḍūⲹپٳپ ٲⲹ� ca chāndegya� bṛhadāraṇyaka� tathā || [6]

Śrī Ś԰첹, the great exponent of Advaita Vedanta was largely influenced by the spiritual content of the 貹Ծṣa. In the commentary on the Brahmasūtrā, Śrī Ś԰첹 refers to five more, namely, Śvetāśvatarā, Kuasitakī, Jabalā, Ѳⲹṇa and Paingaḷa. Śrī Ś԰첹’s commentaries on these 貹Ծṣa, especially on their passages pregnant with philosophical and spiritual import, are masterpieces of philosophical discussion illumined by deep spiritual insights.

Among the 貹Ծṣaic order, īś屹DZ貹Ծṣa forms the 40th adhyāyā (chapter) of the Vājasaneyasaṃhitā and is, therefore, known as the Saṃhitopaniṣad, just as the ṛhṇyDZ貹Ծṣa which belongs to the same Vajasaneyī branch, which is known as the Brāhmaṇopaniṣad. It begins with ‘Īśāvāsyaṃ� and so it is called ĪśDZ貹Ծṣa. This 貹Ծṣa embodies in its very opening verse the central theme of all the 貹Ծṣa, namely, the spiritual unity and solidarity of all existence. It gives a valuable mystical description of the Atman, a description of the ideal sage who stands unruffled in the midst of temptations and sorrows -an adumbration of the doctrine of Karmayoga as formulated later. Finally there is a reconciliation of the claims of knowledge and works. This small 貹Ծṣa, consisting of only eighteen verses is a compendium of almost all the teachings regarding the Brahmavidya and the way to realize it.

ԴDZ貹Ծṣa belongs to the Brāhmaṇopaniṣad and it is of the Talavakāra branch of the 峾岹. Thalavakāra 貹Ծṣa is also known as Jaiminīya 貹Ծṣa 󳾲ṇa. So the 貹Ծṣa is also named as Thalavakāra 貹Ծṣa. It consists of four sections, the first two being composed in verse, and the last two in prose. It begins with ‘keneṣitaṃ� and so it is called Kena. This 貹Ծṣa illumines the nature of knowledge by pointing out the eternal knower behind all acts of knowing, and purifies man’s concept of Ultimate Reality and of all touch of finitude and relativity by revealing its character as the eternal self of man and the self of the universe. This 貹Ծṣa then, introduces an allegory to show the extra-ordinary power of Brahman by whose mere wish the Gods obtained a victory in their battle with the demons.

The ṻDZ貹Ծṣa, the branch of carakakaṭhaśākha of ṛṣṇayajurveda contains an account of the Brahmavidya as narrated by Yama to Naciketas in poetic style. According to Śrī Ś԰첹 it is divided into two chapters and each chapter is again divided into three vallis. This 貹Ծṣa has a unique characteristic of its own in that it gives a complete outline of the whole of the spiritual life. It holds a special fascination for all students of the 貹Ծṣa for its happy blend of charming poetry, deep mysticism, and profound philosophy. It contains a unified exposition of Vedanta than any other single 貹Ծṣa.

The ʰśԴDZ貹Ծṣa is coming under in Pippalādaśākha of Atharvaveda, as its name implies, is an 貹Ծṣa of questions; each of its six chapters is concerned with a question asked by each of a group of six inquiring students on various aspects of Vedanta, and the answers given by their teacher, sage Pippalada. This Brāhmaṇopaniṣad also deals with the distinction between and a貹 vidyas as also with the cosmological problem regarding the creation of the world and with the conditions of sleep and dream.

The ѳṇḍDZ貹Ծṣa, is the part of the Saunakīyā branch of the Athaṛvaveda. It contains the instruction on the Brahmavidya and is imparted by Sage Angira and it begins by saying that the Veda consists of two vidyas, para and apara. Each of the three �ѳṇḍ첹s� is again divided into two parts or Ի岹.

The ṇḍūDZ貹Ծṣa is also coming under in Atharvaveda, it contains only twelve verses and it is the smallest of all 貹Ծṣa. This 貹Ծṣa explains the symbol AUM in three different states and adds a fourth part, corresponding to which there are different states of consciousness. The great originality of the ṇḍūⲹ consists in positing the four stages of consciousness, namely, wakefulness, dream, and sleep and a fourth un-namable state of consciousness. Śrī Gaudapāda commenting on the ṇḍūDZ貹Ծṣa calls it the ṇḍūⲹkārikā; and it is the very foundation and the gist of the Advaita philosophy which is the crest of the whole spiritual experiences. It proclaims in its second verse the infinite dimension of man in a pregnant utterance-one of the four 屹ⲹ or ‘great utterance� of the 貹Ծṣa: ‘This Atman is Brahman�.[7]

ղٳپīDZ貹Ծṣa consists of three prapathakas, the 7th, 8th and 9th of ղٳپīⲹ āraṇayaka. There are three parts for it. The first , also known as the śikṣ�, is narrated as several ܱԲ, and this ⲹ, is divided into twelve anuvākas which tell us how the ܱԲ constitute the internal means of attaining Brahmavidya. The second ⲹ, named Brahmāndavalli deals with karma and ܱԲ. It is useful for realizing Brahman and the source of the universe. The third ⲹ or Bhṛguvalli also pertains to the attainment of Brahmavidya. The peculiar feature of this 貹Ծṣa is the narration of Pañcakośas.

The ٲDZ貹Ծṣa, properly so-called, is only a part of the larger Aitareya Āṇy첹 beginning with the fourth section of the second chapter of the Āṇy첹 and stretching upto the end of that chapter. It consists of three chapters which are all important. It proclaims another of the four 屹ⲹ, ‘Brahman is pure conscousness�.[8] The first chapter gives us the secret of creation. Everything has been created out of Atman or Brahman. The second chapter lets us know of the three births of a man or Atman. The Creator desires to continue His art of creation. The third chapter deals with the nature of Atman.

The ԻDzDZ貹Ծṣa is the Brāhmaṇopaniṣad of the Chāndogya branch of 峾岹. “The word Chāndogya is derived from ‘candhas + ga� meaning �metre singing�, a term used to denote saman chanting�.[9] It has eight adhyāyās and it aims at describing the highest wish of the human life. The first five chapters of this 貹Ծṣa dilates on worship and knowledge. Śrī Ś԰첹 in his commentary divides worship into three; -the first is connected with sacrifice and sama, the second and the third are connected with Brahman: -ṇa (with attributes) and Niṛguṇa (without any attributes). The central idea of ԻDzⲹ-ܱ貹Ծṣa is related to a man who is completely engrossed in doing the actions in order to fulfill his desires to give some time and attention, first to the practice of the ܱԲ and energy to the realization of Ātmavidya.

The ṛhṇyDZ貹Ծṣa is known as �ṛh� because it is the most voluminous of all. It has been studied in the forest [āraṇyaka] and it is also known as �Āṇy�. It forms the Vājasaneyi brāhmaṇa portion of the 첹ṇv branch of the Śuklayajurveda. It has the special features of Āranyaka and 貹Ծṣa. This 貹Ծṣa contains six chapters. These chapters provide a full analysis of Indian philosophy.

Most of the 貹Ծṣa majestically expound through fascinating dialogues, conducted by the outstanding personalities, the central theme of all the 貹Ծṣa, ie; the divinity of man and the spiritual solidarity of the whole universe as Brahman. This is also the central theme of ṛhṇy첹-ܱ貹Ծṣa It contains one of the four mahavākyas, ‘I am Brahman�.[10]

Śrī Ś԰첹’s commentaries on these 貹Ծṣa especially on their passages that are pregnant with philosophical and spiritual import, are masterpieces of philosophical discussion illumined by deep spiritual insights. In his commentary on the 󳾲ūٰ he refers to more. Among these, Kuaṣitakī 貹Ծṣa has made important philosophical thoughts. This 貹Ծṣa is also called ܲṣiٲ쾱󳾲ṇo貹Ծṣa. It belongs to the part of the School of the Kuaṣitakins, or as they are also named, the śānkhāynas, who possess a Brahmanaand an Āṇy첹 joined with it. This 貹Ծṣa is divided into four chapters and they are the same as the four adhyayas of the Kuaṣitaki Āṇy첹, identified as the sixth, the seventh, the eight, and the ninth ones. This 貹Ծṣa is not included in the ten major 貹Ծṣa; yet it is an important one. It enjoys an antiquity equal to that of the ancient prose 貹Ծṣa like B�. Up., Ch. Up. and Kau. Up. etc deal with the sole 貹Ծṣaic problem of the Absolute, transcending of the phenomenal world; it identifies ṇa with the Highest Truth and extols the knower of the truth. This 貹Ծṣa discusses spiritual truth with the help of metaphors, namely, 𱹲Բ, 辱�-Բ, ṇavidhyā and ātmavidhya.

Śśٲ ܱԾṣa is a part of the ղٳپīⲹ Branch of the ṛṣṇa Yajurveda. The teacher of this 貹Ծṣa is Śśٲ. It is divided into six chapters. From the speculative or philosophical point of view, this 貹Ծṣa is of great importance. Various metaphysical thoughts are discussed in this 貹Ծṣa. It is stated that the Supreme God is the ultimate cause of the world. The means of realization of this God is by the meditation on AUM.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

Dasgupta S N., A History of Indian Philosophy, Vol.I P-39

[2]:

Dr. S.Radhakrishnan., Thirteen Principal Upanishads, P-16

[3]:

R.D.Ranade, A Constructive Survey of 貹Ծṣaic Philosophy, P-9

[4]:

S.M Srinivasachari, The Philosophy of Upanishads, Introduction

[5]:

ѳܰپDZ貹Ծṣa -1.27

[6]:

Ibid -1.30

[7]:

Mā. Up. -1.2

[8]:

Ai. Up. -5.3

[9]:

Witz Klaus G., The Supreme Wisdom of 貹Ծṣa, P-217

[10]:

B�. Up.-1.4.10

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: