365bet

Buddha-nature (as Depicted in the Lankavatara-sutra)

by Nguyen Dac Sy | 2012 | 70,344 words

This page relates Early period (e): The Anuttarashraya-sutra of the study on (the thought of) Buddha-nature as it is presented in the Lankavatara-sutra (in English). The text represents an ancient Mahayana teaching from the 3rd century CE in the form of a dialogue between the Buddha and Bodhisattva Mahamati, while discussing topics such as Yogacara, Buddha-nature, Alayavijnana (the primacy of consciousness) and the Atman (Self).

Go directly to: Footnotes.

The ٰ translated into Chinese by ʲٳ under the name Wu-shang-yi-jing (T16n669, pp. 468a-77c) consists of 4 main chapters whose titles are also four Buddhas precious aspects (ratna, gotra):

1. ղٳ󨡲ٲdhtuparivarta (ru-lai-jie; Buddhas Realm)

2. ղٳ󨡲ٲbodhi (pu-ti; Buddhas Bodhi),

3. ղٳ󨡲ٲgu?a (ru-lai-gong-de; Buddhas Merits),

4. ղٳ󨡲ٲkriy (ru-lai-shi; Buddhas Works).

The title Գܳٳٲ?ⲹ (The Supreme Dependence) seems to mean the ղٳ󨡲ٲ that possesses these four supreme aspects upon which people should depend. The comparison of Jikido Takasaki shows that the Գܳٳٲ?ⲹ-ٰ was composed after the 鲹ٲԲdzٰ󨡲?ٰ as a kind of sutralization of the latter. He analyzes that besides the similarities with the 鲹ٲԲdzٰ󨡲, a stronger factor which shows that this Stra is an imitation of the is that this ٰ refers to certain passages which are quotations from other ٰs in the Ratna as if they were its own sentences. He concludes the Գܳٳٲ?ⲹٰ is a composition based upon the 鲹ٲԲdzٰ󨡲?ٰ, re-shaping its contents into the frame of ٰ style and keeping its stress on the bodhi aspect, which is the highest basis (Գܳٳٲ?ⲹ).[1]

This ٰ also sets forth the theories of the Three Bodies of Buddha without giving their names. It is stated in the ٰ:

y. ozM. ǹ̎. y. ߟo᳣ס. ˳סжN. һ߲. ߟoFoM. ᳣ס.[2]

?nanda, what are the practices and abodes of the bodhi? Three bodies are manifested by three reasons. First the reason of profound meaning, second the reason of the magnificent and great cause, and third the reason of immeasurable merit.[3]

Like the Mahparinirv?aٰ, the Գܳٳٲ?ⲹ-ٰ also confirms the potential supreme Buddhahood of the Icchantikas if they practice the Ѳ󨡲⨡Բ doctrines that the Buddha teaches.[4]

Thus, the Գܳٳٲ?ⲹ-ٰ systematizes the ideas of the Buddha-nature that were presented in the ղٳ󨡲ٲgarbha texts prior its time. For that reason, this Stra is not much important in the study of the Buddha-nature.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

Jikido Takasaki, ?ܳٳٲԾ쨡ⲹ Study on the 鲹ٲԲdzٰ󨡲, pp. 50-51

[2]:

Taisho Tripi?aka (CBETA 2011) [T16n669], pp. 473a21.

[3]:

Guang Xing, The Concept of the Buddha: Its Evolution from Early Buddhism to the Trikaya Theory, p. 163.

[4]:

һU˗.x؝.˻f.˷Q (Taisho Tripi?aka (CBETA 2011) [T16n669], p. 472a09).

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: