Formal Education System in Ancient India
by Sushmita Nath | 2016 | 63,563 words
This page relates ‘Subjects studied in the Buddhist Period� of the study on the (formal) education system in Ancient India with reference to Vedic and Buddhist period, investiging educational institutions and universities which existed during this time. Professional educational methods were found in ancient Sanskrit literature (Brahamanas, Dharma-Shastras, Puranas, Jatakas, etc.), including rules, ceremonies and duties of pupils in ancient India.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Subjects studied in the Buddhist Period
The Buddhist education system also introduced very rich curriculum of studies. They also started with scriptures. Their principal and prominent subjects of study were the Sutta Pitaka, Vinaya Pitaka and Abhidhamm Pitaka[1]. These three were the core subjects of study. All the students had to learn by heart these subjects. Besides these, many other subjects were also included in the Buddhist curriculum.
During the age education system was divided into Primary course and Secondary course. Hiuen Tsang and I-tsing the two Chinese travellers very clearly mentioned that during the age the students had to learn the primary courses; after that they received the secondary courses of knowledge. I-tsing mentioned that the education of the child began at six years of his age. From the very beginning of his education, the students first studied the Siddhirastu[2]. This Siddhirastu contained the Sanskrit alphabet and syllables arranged in śǰ첹. Next at the age of eight, the child learnt the ūٰ of ṇiԾ. This took the eight months to finish. After gaining the knowledge of alphabet and ūٰ of ṇiԾ, from ten to fifteen years the student learnt the ٳٳ, Khilas and Kāśikāvṛtti[3]. These were the śǰ첹 and commentaries which were composed by learned 徱ٲⲹ, a man of very striking literary power.
Next the student began to learn the composition in prose and verse, logic, metaphysics and the introductory work composed by ܲԲ called ⲹ-dvara-taraka-śٰ. And at the end of the elementary course, the students studied the five viz. Śabdavidyā, Śilpasthānavidyā, ciktsāvidyā, Hetuvidyā, and ٳ[4].
Having finished the elementary courses, the students studied the secondary courses. In the secondary courses included with Grammar, Ѳṣy, ṛh-Śāstra, Bhaṛtrihari’s Vākyapādiya, and ṛh ḍa(probably Sanskrit ḍa). These ṛh works probably are the slokas and commentaries which were composed by great scholar ṛh[5].
Besides these, from the ٲ첹 stories and from the evidence of Milinda ʲñ give idea about the subjects of studies in Buddhist education system. The ٲ첹 stories and the Milinda ʲñ mentioned that Vedas and Sippas or liberal arts were the principal subjects of study in Buddhist period. In ղṣaś the students always studied the Vedas and eighteen Sippas[6]. The ٲ첹 stories mentioned that Sippas were eighteen in number. They did not enumerate the Vedas in the Sippas. Whereas Milinda ʲñ referred to nineteen Sippas, they enumerated Vedas in the Sippas. Milinda ʲñ also gives the individual names of the nineteen Sippas viz., Satthas (Śٰ) which includes the four Vedas and described as Suti (Śܳپ), Samuti (ṛt), ⲹ (ṃkⲹ), Yoga, īپ (ⲹ), Viśeṣika (ղśṣi첹), Ҳṇi (arithmetic) Ի (music) վ쾱 (Medicine), Catubbeda (fourVedas), ʳܰṇa, پ, dzپṣa, (Magic) Hetu (casuistry), ѲԳٲ (Polity), Yuddha (militaryscience), Candasa (prosody) and ѳܻ (conveyancing). Though Vedas and Sippas were the main subjects of study in Buddhist education system but some subjects were separately mentioned in the ٲ첹s and Milinda ʲñ. These subjects were Elephant lore, Magic Charms, Spell for bringing back the dead life, Hunting, Spell for understanding all animal’s cries, Archery, The art of prognostication, Charm for commanding all things of sense, divining from signs of the body and Medicine. These subjects were actually come under the Sippas, but ղṣaś gave special attention of these subjects. Students always tried to specialize these subjects. We find in the ٲ첹 stories that a ṇa boy was specialized in Archery, another specialized in Magic charms[7]. Like that ī첹 was also specialized in Medicine[8].
During the age theoretical and practical aspects of education also receive importance. Basically the students who became mastered in Medicine, Law and Military sciences, they had to know the practical usage of their subjects. But in the ٲ첹 stories we also find that all the students after receiving the theoretical knowledge, they used to go to the far off places to realize the practical experience of their subjects. ī첹 after seven years of his education in ղṣaś, his teacher suggested him to go far off places to receive the practical knowledge of his subjects[9]. We also find many other examples where the students first received the theoretical knowledge after that they wandered various towns, cities and villages for the practical knowledge. In the ٲ첹[10] stories mentioned that Prince of Magadha who was mastered in all the arts of ղṣaś, wandered through the various countries to acquire the practical use of his subjects. There was mentioned of Prince of ś who after receiving education at ղṣaś, travelled about the idea of mastering the practical uses of the sciences[11].
But when we look at the educational institution of Buddhist period, we find that the subjects of study during the age were not only rich but were very vast in number. They offered both the Brahmanic and Buddhists subjects of study. The renowned teachers were the master of both Brahmanical and Buddhist subjects. We are told a teacher at ղṣaś from whose lips five hundred ṃaԲ pupils learnt the Vedas[12]. Even from the ٲ첹 stories we find that instead of Sippas the student can able to choose the Vedas as their core subject of learning. There were no restrictions. As a matter of fact during the age caste distinction did not come in the way of choosing the subjects. There we find many references that many students in ղṣaś learnt divation, magic charms, archery, science under their teachers in exclusion their own subjects[13]. The Bhimsena ٲ첹, Koseya ٲ첹, Asadisa ٲ첹 and many other ٲ첹s mentioned that Bodhisattva himself was mastered in three Vedas and eighteen Sippas. At the age of sixteen he went to ղṣaś and learnt the Vedas and Sippas[14].
The Milinda ʲñ also indicates that the Brahmanical education too was existence in Buddhist curriculum. The Brahmanical subjects like the Vedas, ձṅg, پ, ʳܰṇa, ṃkⲹ, Yoga, ⲹ, and Vaiśiṣika were the main subjects of study during the age. Besides these, many other subjects like special knowledge of ṣaٰⲹ was also included in the curriculum[15].
During the age ѲԲ and īԲ the two schools of Buddhist thought were very popular. Many universities provided one branch of learning. Ի University provided ѲԲ school of thought where as ղī was specialised in īԲ Buddhism. But both the universities did not neglect each other thought. That is why, the Ի University also provided education in īԲ Buddhism.
Here the curriculum of some famous Buddhist Universities is given:
ղṣa:
ղṣa was a centre of higher education and students went there at the age of sixteen. They provided higher education curriculum. The many ٲ첹s mentioned the conventional list of the subjects of study at ղṣa. These subjects were the Vedas, Grammar, Philosophy and eighteen Sippas. These were the principal subjects of study. Among these subjects many other subjects like Medicine, Surgery, Archery, Military Science, Astronomy, Astrology, Conveyancing, Magic, Sanke Charming, the Art of finding treasures, Law,
Music, Dancing and Painting were also included in the curriculum.
Ի:
Ի was also centre of higher education. The subject of study in Ի was very exhaustive. They basically provided education in ѲԲ Buddhism. Hiuen Tsang studied the ѲԲ Buddhism in Ի University where as I-tsing studied īԲ Buddhism in Ի University. Ի also provided Brahmanical subjects of study because Hiuen Tsang mentioned that the students at Ի study both the old and new books. The old and new books mentioned by Hiuen Tsang includes works such as Vedas, ձṅg, ṃkⲹ, ⲹ, Yoga śٰ, Vaiśesika and works on Buddhist śٰs with all its subdivisions. Besides this, from reference of Tibetan works of Ի, it is evident that Tantra was very popular among the students as well as the teachers of Nalanda. The Tantra was also included in the curricula of Ի University. Ի also provided the ordinary subjects of study like Hetuvidyā, Śabdavidyā, Cikitsāvidyā and the works on Magic. But they thoroughly investigated the miscellaneous works.
ղī and վṃśi:
ղī and վṃśi Universities were famous for their educational activities. Both the Universities provided very rich educational facilities to their students. But we have very little information about the subjects of study in ղī and վṃśi Universities. As a matter of fact both the Universities faced many political vicissitudes, so their curricula were thoroughly destroyed for these political ups and downs. We do not find any material evidence about the curricula of ղī and վṃśi University. But it is gathered that both the Universities follow the curricula of Ի Universities. We also find that ղī was school of īԲ Buddhism. They provided education in īԲ Buddhism. They also imparted education in secular subjects like Economics, Accountancy, Politics, Medicine, and literature. Where as in վṃśi University, Grammar, Logic, Mataphysics, Tantra and Ritualism were the main subjects of study. The վṃśi University had special arrangement for the study of non religious or secular subjects.
The Vedic and Buddhist education systems started with their scriptures and both aimed at over the subjects studied. It was not only religious but non religious and secular subjects were also part of the study.
Although the education systems started with their scriptures, the Buddhist education system incorporated the Brahmanical subjects too. It is a matter of fact that Buddhist education systems always tried to establish their own faith and cult. As Buddhism was a new thought and new religion. They always faced the Brahmanic challenges. For this reason they required to know more about the Brahmanical subjects and Buddhist teachers also encouraged their students to study the Brahmanical subjects. But Buddhist and Brahmanic systems did not remain antagonistic to each other. Both the systems were complimentary to each other. The Brahmanic scholars respected the Buddhist society. They also imparted education to Buddhist scholars. Brahmanic scholar also went to Buddhist University to gain the knowledge on Buddhistic subjects. We have already mentioned in the third chapter that in ٳٲ岵, we find the reference of a Brahmin boy completed his education in ղī University[16].
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
Ѳ屹..15.4.
[2]:
I-Tsing.P.170-172.
[3]:
Ibid.P.175.
[4]:
Ibid.P.127.
[5]:
Ibid.P.178-180.
[6]:
ղ첹� gantva tayo veda ṭṭñ ca sippāni uggaṇhitva| Brahāchatta Jataka 336; ṇakumārā ca yebhuyyena tass eva santike 貹� uggaṇhanti.Atheko janapadavāsi brāhmaṇo bodhisattassa santike tayo Vede aṭṭaharasaca vijjaṭṭhānāni |Kosiya ٲ첹 130; so vayappato ղ첹ya sabbsipāni uggṇhitva Bārāṇasi� 貹岵Գٱ Բ� passi|Sattubhasta ٲ첹 402.
[7]:
[8]:
[9]:
[10]:
[11]:
Takkasilato nikhami, sabbasamayasippani sikkhanto ekam paccantagāmakam ṇi | Brahācatta ٲ첹 336.
[12]:
Atit ղ첹ya� Bodhisatto disāpamokkho ācāriyo hutvā pañca māṇavakasatāni mante vācesi |Nāmasiddhi ٲ첹 97.
[13]:
ղ eko bārānasibrāhmaṇo mānavo takkaśilāyā dhanukamme Ծٳپṃ…ĦĦĦ� paṇḍito 峾 ahosi |Culladhanuggaha ٲ첹 374.
[14]:
Tesu Bodhisatatto soḷasavassakāle ղ첹� gantvā disāpāmokkhasa 峦ⲹssa santike tayo vede ṭṭ sippāni ca uggaṇhitvā issāsasippe asadiso hutvā Bārāṇassi� paccāgami| Asadisa ٲ첹 181;
Bodhisttassa santike tayo vede ṭṭ|Kosiya ٲ첹 130;
Takksilāya disāpamokkhassa 峦ⲹssa santike tayo Vede aṭṭharasa vijjaṭṭhānāni ugghetvā sabbasippe hippattimpatva |Bhimsen ٲ첹 80.
[15]:
Milinda pañha.IV.3.26;I.9.