Yajnavalkya-smriti (Vyavaharadhyaya)—Critical study
by Kalita Nabanita | 2017 | 87,413 words
This page relates ‘Untouchability� of the study on the Vyavaharadhyaya of the Yajnavalkya-smriti: one of the most prominent Smritis dealing with Dharmashastra (ancient Indian science of law), dating to the 1st century B.C. The Yajnavalkyasmriti scientifically arranges its contents in three sections: Acara (proper conduct), Vyavahara (proper law) and Prayashcitta (expiation). Vyavahara deals with judicial procedure and legal system such as substantive law and procedural law.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Chapter 3.2b - Untouchability
An important social stigma of ancient India, which subsists until modern times, in spite of various reformative movements led by great leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Raja Ram Mohan Roy, Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar, etc., also prohibited by the Constitution of India and by other legislation, is the untouchability. It is interesting to note that in the ղⲹⲹ of the ñⲹṛt the only caste, which is declared as untouchable in [is?] the ṇḍ. In fact, there is not any extreme view expressed that even the shadow of the ṇḍ is impure or should be deemed polluting. ñⲹ prescribes a fine of one hundred 貹ṇa as fine to the ṇḍ for touching the higher caste like the ṇa, etc.[1] An issue born from the union of a ṇa woman and a Śū male is known as a ṇḍ.45 Their untouchability appears to have originated by birth as a mixed caste, born in the reverse order of sex relation in the society.
The difference between the Śūs and the untouchables is retained in the ñⲹṛt. There is a reference found in the ղⲹⲹ regarding Antya in connection with penalties for crime of adultery, which might have been treated as lower caste than the Śūs. It is said that a Śū, having physical relation with a woman of Antya caste is reduced to the same caste. According to վśū貹, Antya means outcaste or lower than the Śūs.[2] The Ѿṣa states that an Antya woman is a female of a ṇḍ.[3] Hence, Antya appears to represent a generic appellation for all lowest caste like the ṇḍ, etc.[4] Thus, ñⲹ has distinguished the Antya from the Śū, suggesting that during his time the untouchables and the mixed castes have not been considered as Śūs in general. It seems untouchability might have been exaggerated in later periods and more and more castes are brought to its purview.
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
� caṇḍālo’cottamānspṛśet// ñⲹṛt, 2.23445 brāhmaṇyā� kṣatriyātsūto vaiśyādvaidāhikastathā/ sūdrājjātastu ṇḍ� sarvadharmabahiṣkṛta�// Ibid., 1.93
[2]:
antyaśabdo’ya� śūdrānnikṛṣṭāpaśadvacana�/ īḍ�,Ibid., 2.297