365bet娱乐

Eventhough 痴腻蝉耻诲别惫补vijaya is a 痴测腻办补谤补峁嘺艣腻蝉迟谤补办腻惫测补, there is amble scope for the literary analysis of this poem. Being a 艢腻蝉迟谤补办腻惫测补, it does not reject the poetic beauty. Thus it is essential to go through the literary aspects of 痴腻蝉耻诲别惫补vijaya

It is generally believed that the poetic charm of the grammatical poem might be emaciated. This misinterpretation reduces the attention of the readers towards these poems. Thus it is an attempt to bring forth the poetic charm reflected in 痴腻蝉耻诲别惫补vijaya to gain interest of people into such a tradition.

It is already stated in the forgoing chapters that 痴腻蝉耻诲别惫补vijaya is a poem with the story of 碍峁涐梗峁嘺 as its theme. Though this poem satisfies almost all the features in the definition of a 惭补丑腻办腻惫测补, it would not be included in the category of 惭补丑腻办腻惫测补s. The definition of 惭补丑腻办腻惫测补 according to 顿补峁囜笉颈苍 is very popular and this definition^[1] is widely accepted by the scholars to consider the qualities of 惭补丑腻办腻惫测补s.

As ordained in 顿补峁囜笉颈苍鈥檚 惭补丑腻办腻惫测补 definition^[2], V.V is divided in to Cantos. There are so many descriptions on towns^[3], birth of the child^[4], seasons^[5], kings^[6] etc. Besides, the opening verse of the poem is an indication of the theme of the poem and also it is in the form of a benediction.^[7] In this manner the features of a 惭补丑腻办腻惫测补 is satisfied in 痴腻蝉耻诲别惫补vijaya But those descriptions and the like will not go long. Some of them are just indications. The author of the poem might be intended to classify this under the head of 惭补丑腻办腻惫测补. This may tempt the author to include all the features in his poem. But these qualities are not enough to satisfy the status of this poem to the rank of a 惭补丑腻办腻惫测补. The fulfilment of the qualities ascribed in the definition is not enough to lead to its greatness.

Besides, Prof. K.P. Kesavan has agreed with this opinion, this statement is recorded in the Proceedings of the National seminar on 痴测腻办补谤补峁噊诲腻丑补谤补峁嘺办腻惫测补蝉 held at Department of Sanskrit, University of Calicut.^[8] References to this poem lead to the conclusion that it shouldn鈥檛 undergo the section of 惭补丑腻办腻惫测补s. The attempt to prove this point will be futile.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

办峁泃腻谤迟丑补迟腻 yasya 辫补诲腻尘产耻箩补峁� 蝉补诲腻 ni峁�evam膩峁嘺峁� v峁涐箛ute'cir膩tsvayam |
h峁沝膩 dadhatta峁� vasudevanandana峁� punegirastaccarit膩m峁泃ormibhi岣� ||
  痴腻蝉耻诲别惫补vijaya of 痴腻蝉耻诲别惫补 with 笔补诲补肠补苍诲谤颈办腻 commentary, Prof. Vijayapal Sastri,v.I.1

[2]:

sargabandho mah膩k膩vyamucyate tasya lak峁�a峁嘺m |
膩艣墨rnamaskris膩 vastunirde艣o 惫腻辫颈 tanmukham || (K膩vy膩dar艣a of 顿补峁囜笉颈苍 I.12-20).

[3]:

Prof. Vijayapal Sastri,op.cit.v.I.23 (Description of Mathura and the King).

[4]:

ibid,v.3.1-10.

[5]:

ibid,v.6.125-135.

[6]:

ibid,v.1.23

[7]:

ibid,v.1.1

[8]:

耻迟蝉补惫补岣� sudhiy膩malam (vy膩kara峁噊d膩hara峁嘺k膩vye峁�u 惫颈肠腻谤补岣�) |
  Ed. Dr.N.K.Sundareswaran, Publication Divition, Calicut University, October 2017.
  It is the proceedings of the National seminar held at Department of Sanskrit, University of Calicut on March 15-17.