The body in early Hatha Yoga
by Ruth Westoby | 2024 | 112,229 words
This page relates ‘Mahabharata: paka and sovereignty� of study dealing with the body in Hatha Yoga Sanskrit texts.—This essay highlights how these texts describe physical practices for achieving liberation and bodily sovereignty with limited metaphysical understanding. Three bodily models are focused on: the ascetic model of ‘baking� in Yoga, conception and embryology, and Kundalini’s affective processes.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Ѳٲ: 첹 and sovereignty
The Ѳٲ (first to third centuries CE) is a repository of yogic lore. Here yoga, like asceticism (tapas), ‘is seen as a glorious power in itself, through which the yogi becomes mightier than the gods and can even burn up the entire universe� (Mallinson and Singleton 2017:361). ṛṣṇa, in the well-known 岵ī portion of the Ѳٲ, warns against harsh or tamasic asceticism, ‘mindlessly emaciating the aggregate of elements that make up the body and me within the body� (岵ī 17.5-6) (Johnson 1994:71). The Ѳٲ frequently uses the epithet ‘whose semen is turned upwards� (ūٲ) to describe ascetics and specifically teaches a channel carrying semen and nourishing the body through other channels: mastery of semen leads to liberation and the yogi’s ‘faults are burned up� (ṣṇٳ 12.207.24) (Mallinson and Szántó 2021:16n36; Takahashi 2019). Tapas is a recurrent feature in the Ѳٲ but a term that occurs rarely in the ṻ corpus. This exploration of the mediate corpus—beyond the confines of the early ṻ ٱٲ�limits the discussions of tapas to focus on passages on baking. After an examination of such a passage in the Ѳٲ we turn to the Բśٰ, Ѵǰṣoⲹ and 貹ǰṣānܲūپ.
The Ѳٲ refers to baking the body with terminology (śī貹پ) close to that of the ۴DzīᲹ’s. The ۴DzīᲹ’s passage may be foreshadowed in these passages:
Actions bake the body, but knowledge is the highest goal. When impurity has been baked with the help of vomiting, a knowledge of [its] taste does not remain. Therefore kindness, patience, peace, non-harm, truth, honesty, unmaliciousness, humility, modesty, endurance and equanimity—these are the roads that lead to brahman. By means of these, one attains that which is highest. (Ѳٲ 12.262.36-38)[1]
The term 첹ṣҲ is here taken as ‘impurity� as it is used in another instance in the same section of the Ѳٲ (Ѳٲ 12.237.002-12.237.005).[2] ṣҲ may also be an astringent medicine.[3] Sharma discusses the cooking of 첹ṣҲ in relation to a similar but unreferenced �ṛt� passage: ‘There is definite talk of cooking or boiling (貹پ�, pakve). What is cooked is the stuff of impurity or 첹ṣҲ; one that should be particularly included is what prevails in Āܰ岹 (medical treatise), namely a decoction brewed by boiling certain herbs with water. There are any number of 첹ṣҲs. The same process is used in ritual. What is implied is sacralizing actions� (Sharma 2000:20). Yoga can certainly be understood as ‘sacralizing actions�.
As noted, the trope of tapas is extensive within the Ѳٲ and it cannot be detailed here. Suffice to mention the intimate connection between emotion and tapas, in order to link the discussion to affect—and this aspect of 첹 in the ṻ corpus. Tapas is destroyed by emotion. There are innumerable angry ascetics in the Ѳٲ despite the adage �anger destroys penance� (Ѳٲ 1.38.8) as analysed by Dhand at length (such as 2008:61 and throughout). A primary cause of the generation and accumulation of tapas is restraint of sexual desire (Dhand 2008:76). As Knipe notes, �Tapas and 峾 [desire] cooperate in keeping the created world together; erotic desire poses the strongest threat to ascetic worldtranscendence� (2005:8998). Sex is correspondingly the simplest means to sabotage tapas.
The physical loss of fluid represents the diminution of ascetic energy (ŚԳپ貹 12.207.22, 12.277.28) (Dhand 2008:78). But often the ṻ sources are not bound by this dictum: rather, baking the body is purifying by destroying faults and undoing the restraining impact of karma, and then in some cases the yogi may ‘do as he please�, including experience 峾. If baking the body is predicated on an earlier tapasic ascetic model it also inherits ideas of desire—and gestation, discussed below.
Before leaving the Ѳٲ I draw a connection between immolation and asceticism. Some ascetics end their lives in forest fires, such as ٳṛtṣṭ, Իī and ܲԳī. This manner of death burns off sin (Hill 2001:49) similar to the way in which tapas burns through the karma that keeps one captive in ṃs (Dhand 2008:76). The story of the pigeons and hunter brings together tapas and immolation. The pigeon immolates himself on the advice of his wife to provide a meal for the hunter as his guest (Ѳٲ 12.142.40). Upon this action he attains heaven. The fowler is filled with remorse and resolves to change his way of life in fear of the sin he has accrued as a hunter (Ѳٲ 12.143.5). The hunter performs many ascetic practices which are considered to generate tapas. He pledges to give up his life, forsake his children and wife, avoid all food and dry his body up as if it were a puddle in summer (Ѳٲ 12.145.1). He immolates himself in a forest fire and all his sins are destroyed, attaining the most supreme perfection (Ѳٲ 12.145.10). The hen pigeon also immolates herself, with resonances with ī as ‘an amalgam of two distinct concepts: religious self-immolation, and the burning of widows at their husbands� pyres� (Matilal 2002:154).
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
[2]:
Thanks to Wojtczak for discussing this passage and sharing this reference, 26 October 2023.