The body in early Hatha Yoga
by Ruth Westoby | 2024 | 112,229 words
This page relates ‘Cosmos as elemental and jada� of study dealing with the body in Hatha Yoga Sanskrit texts.—This essay highlights how these texts describe physical practices for achieving liberation and bodily sovereignty with limited metaphysical understanding. Three bodily models are focused on: the ascetic model of ‘baking� in Yoga, conception and embryology, and Kundalini’s affective processes.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Cosmos as elemental and Ჹḍa
If the body is elemental, affective and material or insentient (Ჹḍa) what is the cosmos? The cosmos encompasses the proximate locale of the practitioner, the manner of polity (ideally peaceful as conducive to yoga practice), and the earth more broadly as goddess, as heaven and hell realms, and as constituted by the phases of emergence, continuity and dissolution. It is these latter senses, of cosmos as elemental and temporally cyclical that are perhaps most relevant here, yet the earth as goddess can also correlate to ṇḍī as goddess. The analysis of the yogi as sovereign is also informed by the relationship between earth as goddess and yogi as sovereign. The ṻ yogi appears to gain control of the cosmos as does the yogi of the Ѳٲ: �Yoga leads not only to control of oneself, but also to control of the world� (Jacobsen 2005:6).
The texts articulate the elemental constitution of the cosmos. In the ṛt the cosmos is within the body in terms of geographic and divine cartography (ṛt 1.15-17) and the cosmic features of sky, wind, fire, water and earth are in the body (ṛt 1.18). In the ī the yogi sees the entire universe as undifferentiated from himself (ī 1.64). But here I focus on a passage in the Ҵǰṣaśٲ첹. Here a rather difficult passage appears to identify the cosmos and body as of the same nature. Two verses define freedom from the state of materiality (ḍy屹Ծ ܰپ�) and error regarding the appearance of time (Ҵǰṣaśٲ첹 91) as doctrines that have the form of the rope and the snake—i.., doubt about the nature of reality. Time is the cause of doubt about the nature of reality (Ҵǰṣaśٲ첹 92).[1] The elemental universe is illusory from the perspective of the temporal body (Ҵǰṣaśٲ첹 93) as it is produced from the elements: it is neither real in name nor form (Ҵǰṣaśٲ첹 94). It is through comparison between the universe and the body that both are found to be unreal. Both are material and insentient although they appear otherwise within the incorrect frame of temporal perception. The text draws on tropes familiar from Գٲ to make this case: in addition to the rope and snake we have water in a mirage, the hare’s horn, and knowledge from a dream (Ҵǰṣaśٲ첹 92-97). If the argument is sophisticated the witnesses are poor. What is clear is that through introspection the body is revealed as insentient or material because it is formed of the elements (Ҵǰṣaśٲ첹 98)—and the universe is also elemental (Ҵǰṣaśٲ첹 93). Ҵǰṣaśٲ첹 99, again difficult to construe, appears to assert the importance of the breath while Ҵǰṣaśٲ첹 100 refers to seven levels and the attainment of perpetual happiness in a condition it calls ‘being without fire� (Ҵǰṣaśٲ첹 100). The text concludes with a poetic and sexual interiorisation of the practice that we shall consider in chapter four. The description of the body as material (Ჹḍa) and composed of the elements is key to understanding how the processes of yoga, such as baking (첹) and meditation on the elements, operates. Here I emphasise the articulation of the body and cosmos as both Ჹḍa.
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
Mallinson’s draft translation takes ٲܻ徱ٲٳپ� as, ‘the condition arises of considering their cause to be time� and notes this section could be cruxed.