365bet

Prasthanatrayi Swaminarayan Bhashyam (Study)

by Sadhu Gyanananddas | 2021 | 123,778 words

This page relates ‘Vedic Darshana Tradition and the Prasthanatrayi Shastras� of the study on the Prasthanatrayi Swaminarayan Bhashyam in Light of Swaminarayan Vachanamrut (Vacanamrita). His 18th-century teachings belong to Vedanta philosophy and were compiled as the Vacanamrita, revolving around the five ontological entities of Jiva, Ishvara, Maya, Aksharabrahman, and Parabrahman. Roughly 200 years later, Bhadreshdas composed a commentary (Bhasya) correlating the principles of Vachanamrut.

Go directly to: Footnotes.

3. Vedic Darśana Tradition and the ʰٳԲٰī Śٰ

What are Śٰ?

śپ ca trāyate ca iti śٰm’Ĕthat which rule and protect us are called scriptures.

anekasaṃśayocchedi parokṣārthasya darśakam |
sarvasya dzԲ� śٰ� yasya nāstyandha eva sa� ||

Śٰ uproot doubts and clarify principles that are difficult and subtle. Śٰ are the true eyes of man. Without them we are blind. In this chapter, we will acquaint ourselves with the three foremost of the many Hindu śٰ. Collectively known as the ٳԲٰī, these three śٰ have been stamped with philosophical treatises.

ʰٳԲٰī

ʰٳԲ means a śٰ that establishes principles, and the suffix ٰī denotes the quantity of three. The three śٰ which comprise the ٳԲٰī are the 貹Ծṣa, Śī Bhagavad ī, and 󳾲ūٰ. These śٰ are named ʰٳԲ because it is only through them that philosophical principles are established (ʰٳ貹Բ). Hindu ٲԲ ṃpⲹ have always established, supported, and promoted their philosophical principles using the ʰٳԲ Śٰ. This unique tradition started in ancient times. Āⲹ such as Śaṃkarācārya, 峾Գ峦ⲹ, Ѳ峦ⲹ, Nimbārkācārya, ղ峦ⲹ, Rāmānaṃdācārya and others, have written commentaries on these śٰ. Similarly, commentaries on these three śٰ have also been written in the 峾ⲹṇa ṃpⲹ. The three Prasthān śٰ are set to be considered as the supreme authority in matters of philosophical debate amongst followers of Hindu ٲԲ Dharma.[1]

1. The First ʰٳԲ: The 貹Ծṣa

The Vedas are the oldest documented manual of mankind. It constitutes a way of life that leads humans to the ultimate bliss of the supreme reality. The Vedas are classified into four parts- ṃh, 󳾲ṇa, Āṇy첹, and 貹Ծṣa. The ant (last part) of Veda is called Vedanta. In this manner, the entire Vedanta system is based on the 貹Ծṣa. In this way, 貹Ծṣa are assessed as a great treasure of mankind by the great personalities of the world.[2] The 貹Ծṣa are based in the Vedas. They are a specific part of the Vedas. Therefore, �na kaścid vedakartā� there is no creator of the 貹Ծṣa. Moreover, �徱Ծ󲹲 � they are a concise collection of the profound philosophical principles of the Vedas. That is why the 貹Ծṣa are also known as Vedanta.

The philosophical definition of 貹Ծṣa is as follows:

upaniṣadyate prāpyate jñāyate 󳾲 anayā iti upaniṣad’�

‘The source from where we can get 󳾲 is 貹Ծṣa.�

Today, we find more than 108 貹Ծṣa. But the ten principal 貹Ծṣa are:

īś-kena-첹ṻ-śԲ-ṇḍ-ṇḍܰⲹ-پٳپ� |
etareya� ca chāndogya� bṛhadāraṇyaka� 岹ś |

“The ten 貹Ծṣa are Īśa (Īśāvāsya), Kena, Kaṭha, Praśna, ѳṇḍ첹, Māṇḍukya, ղٳٲīⲹ, Aitareya, Chāndogya, and ṛhṇy첹.�

The essence of the 貹Ծṣa is 󳾲:

ṣa� ܰṣa� veda ٲⲹ� provāca tā� tattvato 󳾲m� (ѳṇḍ첹 貹Ծṣa 1/2/13).

“That by which ṣa and ʳܰṣa are known in their actuality is 󳾲.�

This is the definition of 󳾲.

2. The Second ʰٳԲ: Śī Bhagavad ī

The Bhagavad ī is the second ٳԲ of Vedanta. It is encompassed within the Ѳٲ. Since the Ѳٲ is a historical text on Indian culture and tradition and the Bhagavad Ҿ resides within it, the Ҿ is also identified as a historical text. The Ҿ consists of the 18 chapters that follow the 25th chapter of The Ѳٲ’sBhishmaparva�. The Ҿ is comprised of 700 verses distributed over these 18 chapters (). Within the text Dhritarashtra recites one verse, Sanjaya recites 41, Arjuna 84, and Śrī ṛṣṇa recites 574 verses.

The Bhagavad Ҿ is in the form of a dialogue. Within the Ѳٲ, it is nested within two other dialogues. Vaishampāyana is its principal speaker, while Janamejaya listens to his narration. Nested within the dialogue between Vaishampāyana and Janamejaya, is a dialogue between Sanjaya and Dhritarāshtra. Further nested within Sanjaya and Dhritarāshtra’s dialogue is Sanjaya’s narration of the conversation between Śrī ṛṣṇa and Arjuna. Among these three dialogues of the Ѳ, the Ҿ is considered to be the most significant. Since its discussions are presented in Գṣṭܱ and other meters, the Ҿ is also understood to be a poetical text.

The aphorism—�پܰṇāb� 岹� ܱ貹ṛṃ� means the meaning of the Vedas should be clarified and supported historical scriptures and the ʳܰԲ. According to this traditional principle, the purpose of the Ҿ is to clarify and substantiate the principles established within the Vedas and 貹Ծṣa. The 󳾲 narrated within the 貹Ծṣa is recollected and reaffirmed within the Ҿ. As a result, the Ҿ is recognized as smritiprasthana.[3]

The glory of the text is said as:

sarvopaniṣado gāvo dogdhā gopālanandana� |
ٳ ٲ� ܻīǰ ܲ� ī峾ṛt� mahat[4]

‘All the 貹Ծṣa are like a heavenly cow, ṛṣṇa milks the cow, Arjuna is like the calf on seeing which milk flows into the udders of the cow, and the milk of that divine cow is the nectar-filled Śī Bhagavad ī, the clever devotees consume that milk.�

3. The Third ʰٳԲ: The 󳾲ūٰ

alpākṣaramasaṃdigdha� sāravad viśvato mukham |
astobhamanavadyam ca ūٰm ūٰvido vidu�[5]

“That which is composed of few words, does not contain long sentences, is capable of expressing an essential message and is clear, is called ūٰ.�

The first ūٰ of the text is �athāto brahmajijñāsā[6] This text elaborates on 󳾲 -knowledge of the two Brahmans -ṣabrahman and Parabrahman -which is described within sacred texts, such as the 貹Ծṣa and Ҿ. Since this text systematically establishes and substantiates 󳾲 through ūٰs, it is known as the Brahmaūٰ.

The Brahmaūٰ consists of four chapters. Each chapter is in turn divided into four . Each is further partitioned into 󾱰첹ṇa or sub-sections, and finally, each 󾱰첹ṇa contains one or more ūٰs. When establishing principles within this text, the author begins by declaring the subject of discussion. He then presents possible doubts and queries regarding the subject by presenting the ū貹ṣa or opposing position. Upon invalidating the ū貹ṣa through resilient and reasoned arguments, the author subsequently presents the ܳٳٲ貹ṣa or the proponent's position. He then ends reasserting the concluding principle. Since the text follows a system that is primarily dependent upon reasoning, the Brahmaūٰ is identified as the tarkaٳԲ.

We have thus acquired a brief overview of the Prasthāntrayi 貹Ծṣa, Bhagavad ī, and Brahmaūٰ. These principal texts highlight -devotion to ʲٳ, and 󳾲 (describes Brahman and Parabrahman which is the chief endeavor to attain the final goal).[7]

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

Gupta Gopalji, Hinduo ke Dharmagrantha, Hindulogy Books, New Delhi, May-2008, pp.45-53

[2]:

Max Muller (1823-1900), a famous German scholar, echoed this Sentiment when he said,“If these words of Schopenhauer need any confirmation, I willingly give mine�. 峾ī Vivekānda (1863-1902) commented, “We need strength. Who will give us strength? The 貹Ծṣa are a treasury of strength. They are capable of giving strength.� Many luminaries have thus studied and experienced the 貹Ծṣa with astonishment.

[3]:

Reyna Ruth, Introduction to Indian Philosophy, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Co. Ltd Bombay-New Delhi, 1971, pp.37-45

[4]:

Bhagavad-ī- ī Māhatmaya/ 6

[5]:

ҴDZṃd峦ⲹ, Vaiyākaraṇa Siddhānta Kaumudī, Śrīdharmukhollasini-Hindīvyākhyāsamanvitā-4, Caukhambā Surabhāratī ʰśԲ, 2016, p. xiv

[6]:

󳾲ūٰ 1/1/1

[7]:

Kulkarni Chidambara, Vedic Foundations of Indian Culture, The Rsi and The Veda, Shri Dvaipayana Trust Bombay-Dharwar-Banglore, 1973, p.12

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: