Kohala in the Sanskrit textual tradition (Study)
by Padma Sugavanam | 2011 | 95,782 words
This page relates 鈥楥omparison of Kohalamatam with other Lakshanagranthas鈥� of the thesis dealing with Kohala鈥檚 contribution to the Sanskrit textual tradition of ancient Indian performing arts. The study focuses specifically on music (Gita), dance (Nritya), and drama (Natya). Although Kohala鈥檚 original works have not been found, numerous references to him across Lakshana-Granthas (treatises) and works by modern scholars indicate his significance.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Part 1(a).4 - A Comparison of Kohalamatam with other Lak峁峁嘺granthas
The textual content of Kohalamatam at places seems to correspond exactly with that of 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁卛, 厂补峁単墨迟补蝉补尘补测补蝉腻谤补 and 厂补峁単墨迟补尘补办补谤补苍诲补. 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄 was written by Kavicakravarti 笔谤补迟腻辫补 Jagadekamalla, the King of Kaly膩峁� who ruled between 1138 and 1150 C.E. This work is believed to be a very elaborate one that deals with the aspects of 驳墨迟补 and 苍峁泃测补 in five chapters of which only a small part is now available in printed form. 厂补峁単墨迟补蝉补尘补测补蝉腻谤补 of P膩r艣vadeva was written in the 13th century C.E. P膩r艣vadeva has followed the tradition of Jagadekamalla because of which we find that there is a lot of common material in 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁卛 and 厂补峁単墨迟补蝉补尘补测补蝉腻谤补. 厂补峁単墨迟补尘补办补谤补苍诲补, which is dated around the 15th-16th century C.E. also shares lot of material with that of Kohalamatam. There is also quite a bit of common material that Kohalamatam shares individually, with 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁卛, 厂补峁単墨迟补蝉补尘补测补蝉腻谤补 and 厂补峁単墨迟补尘补办补谤补苍诲补. In many places, M. Ramakrishna Kavi has made notes in the margins of several folios in the manuscript of Kohalamatam indicating where the text matter matches with other works.
Comparison 1 Kohalamatam and 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄
The work 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄 is available to us from three different sources. i. Manuscripts of 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄 ii. Quotations found in 叠丑补谤补迟补办辞艣补 of Ramakrishna Kavi iii. Printed Edition of Sa峁叢的俨筩奴岣峚ma峁噄, Edited by D. K. Velankar The manuscripts of 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄 which have been procured from the Oriental Research Institute, Mysore have been used in this study. Of all the manuscripts available from this source, it is only manuscript P-5081 which actually contains authentic material of 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄[1].
The following table shows the instances where the material of Kohalamatam matches with each of the three sources of 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄.
| Subject | Kohalamatam | 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄 | ||
| Printed Edition | Manuscript | 叠丑补谤补迟补办辞艣补 | ||
| Svara -峁氠梗补产丑补 | Fol.2 Line 19 | - | p.88 | |
| Fol.3 Line 6 | - | p.88 | ||
| Fol.4. Line 11 | - | p.88 | ||
| 闯腻迟颈鈥�顿丑测腻苍补 艣濒辞办补 - 峁⒛佱笉j墨 | Fol. 8 Line 1-4 | - | p.690 | |
| 闯腻迟颈鈥摱俪蟛饽宀圆� 艣濒辞办补鈥� 膧谤峁产丑墨 | Fol.8 Line 5-8 | - | p.57 | |
| 闯腻迟颈鈥摱俪蟛饽宀圆� 艣濒辞办补鈥� 骋腻苍诲丑腻谤墨 | Fol.8 Line 9-12 | - | p.174 | |
| 闯腻迟颈鈥摱俪蟛饽宀圆� 艣濒辞办补鈥� 惭补诲丑测补尘腻 | Fol.8 Line 13-16 | - | p.467 | |
| 闯腻迟颈鈥摱俪蟛饽宀圆� 艣濒辞办补- Pan cam墨 | Fol.8 Line 17-20 | - | p.346 | |
| 闯腻迟颈鈥摱俪蟛饽宀圆� 艣濒辞办补鈥� Dhaivat墨 | Fol.9 Line 1-4 | - | p.299 | |
| 闯腻迟颈鈥摱俪蟛饽宀圆� 艣濒辞办补鈥� 狈颈峁Ｄ乨墨 | Fol.9 Line 5-8 | - | p.337 | |
| Svaramantra -峁岣峧补 | Fol.9 Line 9-13 | - | p.688 | |
| Svaramantra - 峁氠梗补产丑补 | Fol.9 Line 13-17 | - | p.89 | |
| 厂惫补谤补尘补苍迟谤补鈥� 骋腻苍诲丑腻谤补 | Fol.9 Line 17 - Fol.10 Line 2 | - | p.173 | |
| 厂惫补谤补尘补苍迟谤补鈥� Madhyama | Fol.10 Line 2-6 | - | p.465 | |
| 厂惫补谤补尘补苍迟谤补鈥� 笔补帽肠补尘补 | Fol.10 Line 6-11 | - | p.346 | |
| 厂惫补谤补尘补苍迟谤补鈥� Dhaivata | Fol.10 Line 11- 15 | - | p.298 | |
| 厂惫补谤补尘补苍迟谤补鈥�狈颈峁Ｄ乨补 | Fol.10 Line 15- 19 | - | p.337 | |
| 搁腻驳补-Time theory鈥� Morning | Fol. 13 Line 19 - Fol.14 Line 2 | - | p.405 | |
| 搁腻驳补-Time theory鈥� Prahara | Fol.14 Line 19 - Fol.15 Line 5 | - | p.404 | |
| 搁腻驳补-Time theory鈥� Evening | Fol.14 Line 19 - Fol.15 Line 5 | - | p.404 | |
| Prabandha | p.21 Lines 1-3, 6-8, 13-20, p.22 line 1-8 | Fol.42 Line 5, Line 8-12 | ||
| 罢腻濒补 / Laya | Fol.23 Line 10- 11 | p.7 sl.58 | - | |
| 101 罢腻濒补s list | Fol.24 Line 4 - | p.8 sl.65-p.9 | - | |
| Fol.25 Line 14 | sl.79b | |||
| 笔谤补蝉迟腻谤补 | Fol.26 Line 3 - Fol.26 Line 9 | p.8 sl. 60-63b | - | |
| 101 罢腻濒补s鈥�濒补办峁峁嘺 | Fol.26 Line 10 - Fol.43 Line 1 | p.9 sl.79c -p.19 sl.132 | Fol.52-52A Line 3 | - |
| 101 罢腻濒补s-svara 补濒补峁僰腻谤补蝉 | Fol.44 Line 18 - Fol.50 Line 18 | - | ||
| 痴腻诲测补 | Fol.54 Line 9-13 | p. 69 sl.1 -p.70 sl.3b | - | |
The three sources of 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄, though apparently represent a single work, individually depict the work very differently. It is interesting that Kohalamatam has common material with all the sources of 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄, but there is not a single common entry of Kohalamatam which can be found in all the three of them.
The use of 辫腻峁乲峁谤补蝉 while giving the 濒补办峁峁嘺 of 迟腻濒补 is a noteworthy aspect seen in the manuscript of Kohalamatam. This technique is seen in works such as 厂补峁単墨迟辞辫补苍颈峁诲蝉补谤辞诲诲丑腻谤补 of 厂耻诲丑腻办补濒补艣补, Sa峁叢的俨筽膩rij膩ta of Ahobala, etc. But this is not found in the work 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄.
In the section on 惫腻诲测补, the classification into tata, vitata, ghana and 蝉耻峁谤补, match. Interestingly, there is a reference to Jagadekamalla in Kohalamatam in the list of avanaddha 惫腻诲测补s.
啶啶灌ざ啷嵿 啶灌啶∴啶曕啶曕ぞ 啶� 啶曕啶∴啶曕啶曕ぞ 啶樴啶膏 啶むぅ啶� 啷�
啶⑧啷嵿啶� 啶� 啶ぃ啷嵿ぁ啶苦あ啶曕啶曕ぞ 啶� 啶啶︵啷嵿啷� 啶⑧啷佮げ啷� 啶むぅ啶� 啷�
啶曕ぐ啶熰ぞ 啶む啶班た啶掂げ啷� 啶曕啶炧啶溹ぞ 啶膏啶侧啶侧啶曕ぞ 啶曕じ啷嵿じ啶掂ぞ 啶むぅ啶� 啷�
啶むぅ啷堗さ 啶灌ぎ啶｀ぞ 啶溹啶炧啶ぞ 啶⑧啷嵿啶� 啶∴ぎ啶班啶曕さ啶距お啶苦え啷� 啷�
啶︵ぞ啶｀じ啷嵿い啶啶啷� 啶氞啶� 啶啶班 啶啶班き啷冟い啶じ啷嵿い啷嵿さ啶苦ぎ啶距 啷�
啶呧さ啶ㄠう啷嵿ぇ啶た啶︵ぞ 啶啶班啶曕啶むぞ 啶啶班い啶距お啶啶ムた啶掂啶啶溹ぞ 啷�辫补峁璦丑补艣肠补 丑耻岣岛办办腻 ca 办耻岣岛办办腻 gha峁璦sa峁� tath膩 |
岣峢补办办腻 ca ma峁囜笉i岣峢补办办腻 ca m峁沝a峁単o 岣峢akul墨 tath膩 ||
办补谤补峁� 迟谤颈惫补濒墨 办耻帽箩腻 蝉别濒濒耻办腻 kassav膩 tath膩 |
tathaiva hama峁嚹� j帽ey膩 岣峢补办办腻 岣峚marukav膩pin墨 ||
d膩峁嘺stambak墨 caiva 产丑别谤墨 prabh峁泃ayastvim膩岣� |
avanaddhabhid膩 prokt膩 prat膩pap峁泃hiv墨bhuj膩 ||[2]
The appearance of the name of 笔谤补迟腻辫补 Jagadekamalla in such a manner indicates the following possibilities. Either the author of this work is referring to the views of Jagadeka and mentioning his name so that the readers can appreciate that these were indeed his views. Or, this could probably be a reading in Jagadeka鈥檚 own treatise, which has found its way into the text of Kohalamatam, but is not to be seen in any of the sources of 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁卛.
2 Kohalamatam and 厂补峁単墨迟补蝉补尘补测补蝉腻谤补
The common entries found in Kohalamatam and 厂补峁単墨迟补蝉补尘补测补蝉腻谤补 are presented in the following table:
| Subject | Kohalamatam | 厂补峁単墨迟补蝉补尘补测补蝉腻谤补 |
| Anatomical origin of svaras | p.3 line18-20 | p. 16 sl.41-42b |
| Reason for naming | ||
| svaras | p.4 line4-7 | p.16 sl.44-p.17 sl.45 |
| 搁腻驳补 | p.11 line7-8 | p.24 sl.58 |
| Prabandha | p.21 line 6-8, 14-15, p.21 line17-p.22 line2, p.22 line3-8 | p.24 sl.9c-10, sl.11c-12b, sl.13-15b,p.25 17c-19 |
| 罢腻濒补 / laya | p.23 line 10-11 | p.76 s.15b-16a |
| 101 罢腻濒补s list | p.24 line4 -p.25 line 14 | p.76 s.24b-p.77 s.39 |
| 碍腻濒补 + Anga | p.25 line14-p.25 last line/ p.26 line2 | p.75 s.2 - 5 |
| 笔谤补蝉迟腻谤补 | p.26 line3 -p.26 line9 | p.78 s.40 - 43a |
| 101 罢腻濒补s鈥摫舨拱灬梗a峁嘺 | p.26 line10 -p.43 line1 | p.78 sl.40鈥損.79 sl.59 (only 29 迟腻濒补s out of available 31 match) |
| 痴补颈峁噄办补 濒补办峁峁嘺m | p.61 line 9,10,12 | p.44 sl.56cd, 57ab, 58ab |
| 狈腻峁瓂补 | p.62 line17-p.69 line7 | p.57 sl.18-p.62 sl.78 |
| 狈腻峁瓂补 | p.74 line5-6 | p.74 sl.234 |
| Nartaka 濒补办峁峁嘺m | p.74 line 7-p.75 line 4 | p.91 sl.154-162 |
| 厂补产丑腻辫补迟颈, 厂补产丑腻 etc 濒补办峁峁嘺m | p.78 line 1-p.79 line 9 | p.80 sl.3-p.81 sl.17b |
Most of the common material is on the subject of 迟腻濒补 and 苍腻峁瓂补. Like the case of 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁卛, even 厂补峁単墨迟补蝉补尘补测补蝉腻谤补 does not include 辫腻峁乲峁谤补蝉 while giving the 濒补办峁峁嘺 of each 迟腻濒补. In addition, we also find that the symbols for the 补峁単补蝉 have been omitted. Another point is that though we do find quite a good amount of common material in these two works, the order in which they appear is random.
3 Kohalamatam and 厂补峁単墨迟补尘补办补谤补苍诲补
The common entries found in Kohalamatam and 厂补峁単墨迟补尘补办补谤补苍诲补 are presented in the table below:
| Subject | Kohalamatam | 厂补峁単墨迟补尘补办补谤补苍诲补 |
| Kohala 惭补迟补峁単补 厂补峁僾腻诲补 (Brahma 狈腻谤补诲补) | p.13 line 5-8 | p.14 sl. 4c - 6b |
| Morning 谤腻驳补蝉 | p.14 line19 -p.15 line6 | p.15 sl.20-23 |
| P奴r峁嘺 谤腻驳补蝉 according to Kohalamatam | p.15 line 18-p.16 line8 | p.16 sl.27-32 |
| Benefits of singing 补耻岣峚惫补 and 峁Ｄ佱笉ava 谤腻驳补蝉. Varieties of kampa | p.16 line18-p.17 line7 | p.20 sl.80 -p.21 sl.85b |
| Rasa for r膩ga | p. 20 line 6-10 | p.19 sl.63-65 |
| 罢腻濒补 | p.20 line 12-16 | p.21 sl.86-88b |
| 101 罢腻濒补s list | p.24 line4 -p.25 line 14 | p.34 sl.3 -p.35 sl.16 |
| 碍腻濒补 | p.25 line 14 -17 | p.43 sl 52,53 |
| 101 罢腻濒补s鈥摫舨拱灬梗a峁嘺 | p.26 line10 -p.43 line1 | p.35 sl.17 -p.39 sl.74b |
The most striking common feature is the Kohala-惭补迟补峁単补 蝉补峁僾腻诲补. This is interesting because, the conversation as it appears in Kohalamatam and Kohalarahasyam, is seen verbatim in 厂补峁単墨迟补尘补办补谤补苍诲补 also. The only difference is that the names of the two persons have been changed. In Kohalamatam and Kohalarahasyam what is depicted as a dialogue between Kohala and 惭补迟补峁単补, is represented as one between 叠谤补丑尘腻 and 狈腻谤补诲补 in 厂补峁単墨迟补尘补办补谤补苍诲补.
4 Kohalamatam and 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨 and 惭腻苍补蝉辞濒濒腻蝉补
There are a few verses of Kohalamatam which match with parts of 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨 and 惭腻苍补蝉辞濒濒腻蝉补. M. Ramakrishna Kavi has made notes in the margin of the Kohalamatam manuscript indicating some of these portions.
| Subject | Kohalamatam | Other granthas |
| 搁腻驳补 and Rasa & Places of origin of svaras in the body | p.5 line 2 - 10 | 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨鈥揅h. sl.79 -82 |
| 搁腻驳补 | p.11 line 1鈥�17 | 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨 Ch.3-sl.267 |
| 痴腻诲测补 | p. 55 line 17-18 | 惭腻苍补蝉辞濒濒腻蝉补 sl.586c- 587b |
5 Kohalamatam and Sa峁叢的俨筺膩r膩ya峁嘺
There is a portion of common material found in Kohalamatam and Sa峁叢的俨筺膩r膩ya峁嘺 of 笔耻谤耻峁迟迟补尘补 Mi艣r膩. This relates to the classification of 谤腻驳补蝉 under the heads 蝉奴谤测腻峁兣沘 and 肠补苍诲谤补尘腻峁兣沘 谤腻驳补蝉 based on the time in which they are to be sung. Sa峁叢的俨筺膩r膩ya峁嘺 frequently refers to a work of Kohala titled 碍辞丑补濒墨测补尘 and the above mentioned material is also ascribed to the same work. The details on this topic have been dealt with in chapter 2 (ref. para 2.1.9.6.1). This really appears to be the only case where a match is found between the unpublished sources and the references to Kohala in published works.
6 Kohalamatam and Svarat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m
Svarat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m is an unpublished work of an unknown author, which deals with 驳墨迟补 and 苍腻峁瓂补 in detail. The manuscripts of Svarat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m are available at Kariavattom (ORI Tvm). This work has been analyzed in depth by Girija Easwaran for her M. Phil research project[3], according to whom the text of Svarat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m and Kohalamatam were more or less a perfect match. She is also of the opinion that Kohalamatam is not a separate work, but just an incomplete form of Svarat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m. But the existence of a work titled Kohalamatam can be confirmed from a reference of the same in an unpublished work called 狈腻峁瓂补sarvasvad墨pik膩 of 狈腻谤腻测补峁嘺 艢颈惫补测辞驳颈苍. Girija Easwaran鈥檚 project also gives information about two other works viz. 厂补峁単墨蝉迟补惫颈诲丑颈办补岣� and 罢腻濒补濒补办峁峁嘺m, both of which have a lot of common material with Svarat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m.
Excepting a few instances such as the Kohala-惭补迟补峁単补-蝉补峁僾腻诲补, almost the entire textual material of Kohalamatam is found verbatim in Svarat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m. Only, the order of appearance of the text is very haphazard. Both of these works also have the same Malay膩lam commentary. It is noteworthy that Svarat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m in itself, is incomplete, and appears to be a part of a larger work. And Kohalamatam seems to be but a part of this, and Kohalarahasyam is a small part of Kohalamatam. The portions in Svarat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m, which do not find place in Kohalamatam are as follows.
These readings are based on Girija Easwaran鈥檚 edition of this work.
| S.No | Relevant portions in Svarat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m (Line No.) | Subject |
| i. | 1-30 | 狈腻诲补, Classification of n膩da |
| ii. | 31- 61 | 艢谤耻迟颈, Svara, A峁ａ弓a vargas? |
| iii. | 62鈥�77 | Anatomical origin of svaras |
| iv. | 133-146 | Attributes to svaras like colours, celestial beings etc |
| v. | 187-191 | 66 艣谤耻迟颈蝉 |
| vi. | 226 | 33 补濒补峁卥腻谤补蝉 |
| vii. | 227-239 | 骋谤腻尘补, 惭奴谤肠肠丑补苍补 |
| viii. | 240-253 | Importance of G墨ta |
| ix. | 295-557 | 搁腻驳补 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| x. | 558 | Kriy膩vara 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xi. | 559-560 | Sugha峁璦 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xii. | 561-562 | Susan ca 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xiii. | 563-564 | 艢墨kar峁 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xiv. | 565-566 | Rasika驳腻测补办补 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xv. | 567-568 | Bh膩vaka 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xvi. | 569-570 | Svabh膩vak峁泃i 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xvii. | 571-572 | Devak峁泃i 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xviii. | 573-575 | Trinetrak峁泃i 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xix. | 576-577 | 101 De艣i 谤腻驳补蝉 |
| xx. | 578-597 | List of 7 gamakas and their 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxi. | 600-614 | Laya, Graha, Yati |
| xxii. | 619-622 | Pan caj膩ti 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxiii. | 623鈥�636 | Atijaghanya, Madhyama, Uttama, Uttamottama 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxiv. | 637-653 | 厂奴岣峚 and Ela 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxv. | 654-667 | Saptag墨tik膩 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxvi. | 668-675 | 艢谤耻迟颈 A峁単as |
| xxvii. | 676-688 | 10 G墨ta 辫谤腻峁嘺蝉 |
| xxviii. | 745-752 | 痴腻诲测补 |
| xxix. | 826-872 | Qualifications of an instrumentalist |
| xxx. | 873-888 | Continuation of 搁腻驳补 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxxi. | 889 | Ran jaka 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxxii. | 890-891 | Parar墨ti 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxxiii. | 892-893 | Sugandha 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxxiv. | 894-895 | Niyama 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxxv. | 896-897 | 膧岣穉pti驳腻测补办补 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxxvi. | 898-899 | R奴paka驳腻测补办补 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxxvii. | 900-901 | Copa峁璦 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxxviii. | 902-903 | Vi迟腻濒补 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xxxix. | 904-905 | Vibandha 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xl. | 906-907 | 惭颈艣谤补 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xli. | 889-907 | 10 gr膩hya驳腻测补办补 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xlii. | 908-933 | Nindya 驳腻测补办补 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xliii. | 934-942 | 痴腻驳驳别测补办腻谤补 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xliv. | 943-950 | Kavit膩k膩ra 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xlv. | 951-954 | 顿辞峁蝉? |
| xlvi. | 955-960 | 痴补颈峁噄办补 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| xlvii. | 973-977 | 16 Dhruvas |
| xlviii. | 978-979 | 惭腻谤驳补 |
| xlix. | 980 | 膧惫腻辫腻诲颈 碍谤颈测腻蝉 |
| l. | 981-982 | 骋腻测补 (?) |
| li. | 983-984 | 峁琱膩ya Lak峁峁嘺m |
| lii. | 1000-1017 | Dance |
| liii. | 1111-1123 | 痴腻驳驳别测补办腻谤补 Lak峁峁嘺m |
| liv. | 1124- 1156 | 101 罢腻濒补s |
| lv. | 1212-1265 | 罢腻濒补s explanation |
| lvi. | 1273-1277 | Vyoma, Bindu, Druta |
| lvii. | 1289-1319 | 罢腻濒补 辫谤补艣补峁僺腻, 碍丑补峁囜笉补 recita, Marma 迟腻濒补鈥揕ak峁峁嘺m |
| lviii. | 1320-1321 | List of 谤腻驳补蝉, Miscellaneous subjects鈥揋raha, 惭腻谤驳补, yati, 膧roh墨, Avaroh墨 etc. |
| lix. | 1324-1325 | 笔补帽肠腻峁単补 濒补办峁峁嘺m |
| lx. | 1381-1395 | 痴墨峁嚹� Mahattvam |
It is clear from the above table that many important chapters such as 驳谤腻尘补, prabandha, r膩ga 濒补办峁峁嘺, gamakas and many such like, which are available in Svarat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m, are missing in Kohalamatam.
One noteworthy point here is the mention of the sixty six 艣谤耻迟颈蝉.
The very same verse which is found in 叠峁沨补诲诲别艣墨 (and later in 厂补峁単墨迟补蝉补尘补测补蝉腻谤补 also) as a quotation of Kohala, is found in Svarat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m also.
啶︵啶掂ぞ啶掂た啶傕ざ啶むた啶� 啶曕啶氞た啶︵啶︵ぞ啶灌ぐ啶ㄠ啶むた 啶多啶班啶むた啶� 啶多啶班啶むた啶溹啶炧ぞ啶ㄠさ啶苦啶距ぐ啶︵啷嵿し啶距 啷�(啷оギ啷�)
啶粪啷嵿し啶粪啶熰た啶た啶ㄠ啶ㄠぞ啶� 啶栢げ啷� 啶曕啶氞た啶︵ぞ啶膏ぞ啶ぞ啶ㄠえ啷嵿い啷嵿く啶啶� 啶啶班い啶苦お啶距う啶え啷嵿い啶� 啷� (啷оギ啷�)诲惫腻惫颈峁兣沘迟颈峁� 办别肠颈诲耻诲腻丑补谤补苍迟颈 艣谤耻迟颈峁� 艣rutij帽膩navic膩radak峁Ｄ佱弗 |(187)
峁峁梗补峁ａ弓颈产丑颈苍苍腻岣� khalu kecid膩s膩m膩nantyameva pratip膩dayanti || (188)鈥擜 study of three unpublished texts鈥擲varat膩l膩di-濒补办峁峁嘺 [Svarat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m], Sa峁叢的俨箆idhikal and 罢腻濒补-濒补办峁峁嘺 [罢腻濒补濒补办峁峁嘺m]: 2001: Lines 187-188
This does not find a place in the manuscript of Kohalamatam (T-822).
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
The manuscripts P-105/1 and P-1298/1 are given under the title 厂补峁単墨迟补肠奴岣嵞乵补峁噄 in the descriptive catalogue. In actuality, these manuscripts contain material of works like 叠丑补谤补迟腻谤峁嘺惫补, Sa峁叢的俨箂udh膩kara, Abhinayadarpa峁嘺m, B峁沨aspatidarpa峁嘺m etc.
[2]:
Kohalamatam: ORI Tvm: Acc No. T822: Fol.55
[3]:
A study of three unpublished texts鈥擲varat膩l膩di濒补办峁峁嘺m, Sa峁叢的俨箆idhikal and 罢腻濒补濒补办峁峁嘺m: 2001