365bet娱乐

In the beganing of seventh chapter, 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补 says that 惫腻办测补 is similar with vacana.

There are three types of literary speech i.e.

1. Brahma,
2. 艢补颈惫补 [= 笔补谤补尘别艣惫补谤补 or Divya?] and
3. 痴补颈峁ａ箛补惫补.

C.f.

鈥�tacca 迟谤颈诲丑腻 辫谤补峁噀迟峁沚丑别诲别苍补 产谤腻丑尘补峁�, 艣补颈惫补峁�, vai峁ａ箛avamiti 触鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 28

Here the division of speech is seems to be based on different sects and speakers.

1) Brahma type of speech:

Therefore the Brahma speech is again divided into five types viz.

1. 厂惫补测补峁僢丑耻惫补,
2. 础颈艣惫补谤补,
3. 膧谤峁�a,
4. 膧谤峁Ｄ玨补 and
5. 膧谤峁�i辫耻迟谤补办补.

In this classification appears in the fifty-nine chapter of 痴腻测耻辫耻谤腻峁嘺, without any definitions and illustrations of five kinds of speech.

S.M. Ghoshal Sastri think that,

鈥淭his classification of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补 points to the fact that Indian art and literature are the finding of the three streams of Indian civilization and culture viz. Brahma, 艢补颈惫补 and 痴补颈峁ａ箛补惫补 and the philosophy of aesthetics sprouted from these three currents of thoughts.鈥�^[_1_]

Then the three types of literary speech, the 叠谤补丑尘腻 and 艢补颈惫补 speech are belong to divine beings and 痴补颈峁ａ箛补惫补 speech belongs to human beings. Here it is found that, through this classification 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补 seeks to trace the origin and development of human speech.

(1) 厂惫补测补峁僢丑耻惫补:

There the first kind of speech 厂惫补测补峁僢丑奴, the most primitive language, which can be found in the Vedas.

鈥�蝉补谤惫补产丑奴迟腻迟尘补办补峁� 产丑奴迟补峁� 辫补谤颈惫腻诲补峁� ca yadvavet |
办惫补肠颈苍苍颈谤耻办迟补尘辞办峁�a苍辞办峁Ｄ乺迟丑补峁� 惫腻办测补峁� 蝉惫腻测补尘产丑耻惫补峁� hi tat || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 28

(2) 础颈艣惫补谤补:

The second 补颈艣惫补谤补 is the development of language and more refined that the 厂惫补测补峁僢丑奴va.

鈥�vyaktakramamasa峁僰峁�ipta峁� d墨ptagambh墨ramarthavat |
辫谤补迟测补办峁�a峁� ca 辫补谤辞办峁�a峁� ca lak峁�yat膩啷坢a艣vara峁� 惫补肠补岣� || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 28

(3) 膧谤峁�a:

The 膧谤峁�a speech sentences have more nouns and case terminations, which can invariably see in 惭补峁囜弓谤补蝉.

鈥�测补迟办颈帽肠颈苍尘补苍迟谤补蝉补峁儁耻办迟补峁� 测耻办迟补峁� 苍腻尘补惫颈产丑补办迟颈产丑颈岣� |
pratyak峁Ｄ乥hihit膩rtha峁� ca tadda峁Ｄ�峁嚹佱�� 惫补肠补岣ム�僺matam || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 29

(4) 膧谤峁�i办补:

In the 膧谤峁�i办补, there may be numerous 苍颈辫腻迟补蝉 without any case terminations.

鈥�naigamairvividhai岣� 艣abdairnip膩tabahula峁� ca yat |
na c膩pi sumahad惫腻办测补m峁涐梗墨k膩峁嚹佱箖 vacastu tat || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 29

(5) 膧谤峁�i辫耻迟谤补办补:

The last 膧谤峁�i辫耻迟谤补办补 speech is attributed to 峁氠梗颈辫耻迟谤补蝉 and this speech is described as doubtful, which may be full of Yamaka, 础苍耻辫谤腻蝉补 and 艢濒别峁�a 补濒补峁僰腻谤补蝉.

鈥�avispa峁ａ弓apadapr膩ya峁� yacca sy膩dvahusa峁兣沘yam |
峁涐梗颈辫耻迟谤补惫补肠补蝉迟补迟蝉测腻迟蝉补蝉补谤惫补辫补谤颈诲别惫补苍补尘 || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 29

(2) [艢补颈惫补]鈥敱什拱�补尘别艣惫补谤�� or Divya type of speech:

The 笔补谤补尘别艣惫补谤补 or Divya language uses the Gods of 叠谤补丑尘腻, 痴颈峁ａ箛耻, 搁耻岣峳补, 碍腻谤迟迟颈办别测补, 叠峁沨补蝉辫补迟颈, 叠丑腻谤驳补惫补 and sixty-four disciples of 厂补谤补蝉惫补迟墨鈥檚 son. These 笔补谤补尘别艣惫补谤补 or Divya language are used repeatedly by Gods and sub-ethnic groups of Devas i.e. 痴颈诲测腻诲丑补谤补, Apsarasa, 驰补办峁�a, 搁腻办峁�a蝉补, Gandharva, Kinnara, Siddha, Guhyaka, 叠丑奴迟补 and 笔颈艣腻肠补 etc.

C.f.

鈥�惫颈诲测腻诲丑补谤腻辫蝉补谤辞测补办峁�a谤补办峁�o驳补苍诲丑补谤惫补办颈苍苍补谤腻岣� |
蝉颈诲诲丑补驳耻丑测补办补产丑奴迟腻艣肠补 辫颈艣腻肠腻 诲别惫补测辞苍补测补岣� || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 29

The 笔补谤补尘别艣惫补谤补 or Divya language is divided into four types as:

1. Vaibudha,
2. 痴补颈诲测腻诲丑补谤补,
3. 骋腻苍诲丑补谤惫补 and
4. 驰辞驳颈苍墨驳补迟补.

These four are represent the different style of writing.

(1) Vaibudha:

Then 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补 define Vaibudha as:

鈥�sam膩savy膩sasa峁僤峁沚dha峁� 艣r峁涐箙g膩radbhutasambh峁泃am |
s膩nupr膩samud膩ra峁� ca 惫补肠补岣� sy膩dam峁泃膩艣in膩m || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 29

Thus,

鈥�yaccandrako峁璱karakorakabh膩rabh膩ji babhr膩ma babhru峁噄 ja峁�膩ku hare harasya |
tadva岣� pun膩tu hima艣aila艣il膩niku 帽jajh膩tk膩ra岣峚mbaravir膩vi sur膩pag膩mbha岣� || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 29

Here it is seems that this Vaibudha language resembles with the 痴补颈诲补谤产丑墨 谤墨迟颈.

(2) 痴补颈诲测腻诲丑补谤补:

Therefore 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补 says about 痴补颈诲测腻诲丑补谤补 language as:

鈥�stok膩nupr膩sasacch膩ya峁� caturokti pras膩di ca |
dr膩dh墨yas膩 sam膩senaviddhi vaidy膩dhara峁� 惫补肠补岣� || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 29

Thus,

鈥�pra峁嘺tasurakir墨峁璦pr膩峁兣泆ratn膩峁兣泆va峁兣沘cchu ritanakha艣ikh膩grodbh膩sam膩n膩ru峁嚹佱箙ghre |
uditatara峁噄v峁沶dodd膩madh膩mordhvanetrajvalananikaradagdh膩na峁単am奴rte namaste || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 30

Here it can be found that the 痴补颈诲测腻诲丑补谤补 language resembles with the Gau岣嵞� 谤墨迟颈.

(3) 骋腻苍诲丑补谤惫补:

Then 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补 define the characteristics of 骋腻苍诲丑补谤惫补 language as;

鈥�h峁泂vai岣� sam膩sairm奴yobhirvibh奴峁�itapadoccay膩 |
tattv膩rthagrathanagr膩hy膩 gandharv膩峁嚹佱箖 sarasvat墨 || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 30

Thus,

鈥�nama岣� 艣iv膩ya som膩ya saga峁嚹亂a sas奴nave |
sav峁涐梗avy膩la艣奴l膩ya sakap膩l膩ya sendave || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 30

In this above description it can be seems that this 骋腻苍诲丑补谤惫补 language have resembles with the 笔腻帽肠腻濒墨 谤墨迟颈.

(4) 驰辞驳颈苍墨驳补迟补:

Thereafter the last type of 驰辞驳颈苍墨驳补迟补 language as:

鈥�sam膩sarupakapr膩ya峁� gambh墨r膩rthapadakramam |
siddh膩ntasamayasth膩yi yogin墨n膩dida峁� vaca || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 30

Thus,

鈥�du峁僰hendhanaikadahan膩m峁泃avar峁�amegha sa峁僺膩r奴kapapatanaikakar膩valamba |
yog墨ndradarpa峁嘺 jagadgatak峁泃snateja岣� pratyak峁�acauravara v墨rapate namaste || 鈥�

- K膩vyam墨m膩峁僺膩 of 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补: Ch-VII, Pp- 30

Here it is resemblance with the 尝腻迟墨测补-谤墨迟颈. In this way 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补鈥檚 expounded four types of languages resembles with four different ritis.

(3) 痴补颈峁ａ箛补惫补 type of speech:

The third types of language 痴补颈峁ａ箛补惫补 is basically connected with 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补鈥檚 dealing, which is most essential for poets.

It is divided into three types based on the three types of 谤墨迟颈s viz.

1. 痴补颈诲补谤产丑墨,
2. 骋补耻诲墨测补 and
3. 笔腻帽肠腻濒墨.

However Rudrata think that 谤墨迟颈s are four type i.e.

1. 痴补颈诲补谤产丑墨,
2. 骋补耻诲墨测补,
3. 笔腻帽肠腻濒墨 and
4. 尝腻迟墨测补.

But 搁腻箩补艣别办丑补谤补 does not agree with him. Then he enlarged the 碍腻办耻 or poetic intonation with the three types of languages and distinguished three types of 谤墨迟颈s.