Sahitya-kaumudi by Baladeva Vidyabhushana
by Gaurapada D膩sa | 2015 | 234,703 words
Baladeva Vidyabhusana鈥檚 Sahitya-kaumudi covers all aspects of poetical theory except the topic of dramaturgy. All the definitions of poetical concepts are taken from Mammata鈥檚 Kavya-prakasha, the most authoritative work on Sanskrit poetical rhetoric. Baladeva Vidyabhushana added the eleventh chapter, where he expounds additional ornaments from Visv...
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Text 10.132
啶膏ぐ啶膏-啶曕啶班啶む 啶え啶距啶膏た 啶ㄠ 啶啶班す啶班啶む啶� 啶啶班い啷� 啶啶椸ぞ啶曕啶粪た 啶 |
啶呧ぇ啷佮え啶� 啶掂た啶た啶ㄠぞ啶� 啶膏啷嵿啶む 啶膏い啶� 啶むじ啷嵿ぎ啶苦え啷� 啶曕啶侧た啶多 啶� 啶む 啶膏啶ぐ啶� ||
saras墨-kurute 尘补苍腻峁僺颈 no murahartu岣� purato m峁沢膩k峁 测补岣� |
补诲丑耻苍腻 惫颈辫颈苍腻测补 蝉补峁単补迟别 sati tasmin 办耻濒颈艣补岣� sa tu 蝉尘补谤补岣� ||
蝉补-谤补蝉墨-办耻谤耻迟别鈥攎akes passionate; 尘补苍腻峁僺颈鈥�hearts; 苍补岣�鈥攐耻谤; mura-丑补谤迟耻岣�鈥攐f the killer of Mura; 辫耻谤补迟补岣�鈥攊n front of (in the presence of); 尘峁沢补-补办峁鈥擮 doe-eyed girl; 测补岣�鈥攚丑辞; 补诲丑耻苍腻鈥拢辞飞; 惫颈辫颈苍腻测补鈥攆or the forest; 蝉补峁単补迟别鈥拦别补诲测; sati tasmin鈥攚hen He is; 办耻濒颈艣补岣�鈥攖丑耻苍诲别谤产辞濒迟; 蝉补岣�鈥攖丑补迟; tu鈥攐苍濒测; 蝉尘补谤补岣�鈥擟耻辫颈诲.
O doe-eyed girl, Cupid, who makes our hearts passionate when 碍峁涐梗峁嘺 is present, has become a thunderbolt now that He is ready to go to the forest.
atra smara-kuli艣au dravye.
Here, Cupid and a thunderbolt are a contradiction between two unique things.
Commentary:
According to 笔补峁囜笉颈迟补-谤腻箩补 闯补驳补苍苍腻迟丑补, the rule that establishes the classification either as a virodha or as a 谤奴辫补办补 is that in virodha, the strikingness lies in the contradiction, not in the nondifference, whereas in 谤奴辫补办补 the strikingness lies in the nondifference鈥攚hich implies a charming similarity of attribute鈥攁nd not in the contradiction.[1]
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
iha hi 补濒补峁卥腻谤补-varge yo yatra sah峁沝aya-camatk峁泃i-patham avatarati sa eva tatr膩la峁卥膩ra iti nirviv膩dam. eva峁� ca r奴pake 鈥�尘耻办丑补峁� 肠补苍诲谤补岣�鈥� ity-膩dau yadyapy asti virodhas tath膩pi na sa tatra pratipip膩dayi峁ta岣�, api tu candra-苍颈峁ａ弓丑腻丑濒腻诲补办补迟惫腻诲颈-sakala-gu峁嚹乶膩峁� mukhe pratipatty-补谤迟丑补峁� candr膩bheda eveti sa camatk膩r墨, na 惫颈谤辞诲丑补岣� (Rasa-驳补峁単腻诲丑补谤补, KM p. 430).