Essay name: Purana Bulletin
Author:
Affiliation: University of Kerala / Faculty of Oriental Studies
The "Purana Bulletin" is an academic journal published in India. The journal focuses on the study of Puranas, which are a genre of ancient Indian literature encompassing mythological stories, traditions, and philosophical teachings. They represent Hindu scriptures in Sanskrit and cover a wide range of subjects.
Purana, Volume 8, Part 1 (1966)
56 (of 340)
External source: Shodhganga (Repository of Indian theses)
Download the PDF file of the original publication
48
पुराणम� - [purāṇam - ] ʱĀ
[Vol. VIII., No. 1
need not, on that account, be regarded as later than the time
of Bhavabhuti.
Again, as already shown, the Bhaviṣyapurāṇa also mentions
the Sun-temple at Kālapriya in the following verse 16-
सांनिध्य� मम पूर्वाह्ने सुतीरे द्रक्ष्यते जन� �
कालप्रिय� � मध्याह्नेऽपराह्ण� चात्� नित्यश� �
[sāṃnidhya� mama pūrvāhne sutīre drakṣyate jana� |
kālapriye ca madhyāhne'parāhṇe cātra nityaśa� ||
] Nay, the passage is still older; for it occurs in the follow-
ing corrupt form in the Sambapuraṇa as shown by Dr. Hazra"-
सांनिध्य� मम पूर्वाह्णे उदित� रज्यते नन� �
कालात्यय� � मध्याह्न� सायाह्ने चात्� नित्यश� �
[sāṃnidhya� mama pūrvāhṇe udite rajyate nana� |
kālātyaye ca madhyāhne sāyāhne cātra nityaśa� ||
] From this it is clear that the Sambapuraṇa, which is the
oldest Purāṇa in which the story of Samba and the temple at
Mūlasthāna occurs, must have known the other two prominent
places of Sun-worship viz. Kālapriya and Sutīra. So the attempt
of Dr. Kane to show that the Varahapuraṇa and with it the Sun-
temple at Kālapriya are later than the age of Bhavabhūti has
failed completely.
Even supposing that all these passages in the Purāṇas are
of a later age than Bhavabhūti, there remain the references to
Kālapriya in the Cambay plates and the Kavyamimāṃsā of Rāja-
sekhara, both of which belong to the beginning of the 10th century
A. D. Have we any evidence that Kālapriya came into existence
and became famous as a centre of Sun-worship within about 150
years after Bhavabhūti? On the other hand, it will be shown
below that the temple of Kālapriya must have been famous before
the seventh century A. D.
Objection 3-Dr. Kane says there is not an iota of evidence
to suppose that Bhavabhūti stayed long at Kālapriya or visited
the place frequently. One may ask in return if there
evidence that he stayed long at Ujjayinī (for Dr. Kane previously
held that Bhavabhūti's plays were staged at the fair of Mahākāla
16. Bhavisya. I, 129.
17. See Studies in the Upapuranas, p. 101.
any
