365bet

Yogashikha Upanishad (critical study)

by Sujatarani Giri | 2015 | 72,044 words

This page relates ‘Place of Upanishad in Vedanta Philosophy� of the English study on the Yogashikha Upanishad—a key text from the Krishna Yajurveda, focusing on the pinnacle of Yogic meditation. This essay presents Yoga as a crucial component of ancient Indian philosophy and spirituality and underscores its historical roots in Vedic literature—particularly the Upanishads and Vedant. The chapters of this study are devoted to the faculties of the mind and internal body mechanisms such as Chakras as well as the awakening of Kundalini.

Go directly to: Footnotes.

Part 6 - Place of 貹Ծṣa in ձԳٲ Philosophy

貹Ծṣa are eternal treaties of the perceivable as well as the sublime domains of knowledge, pre-eminent guide books for the seeker of true light and unalloyed bliss and are scriptures of inclusive and integrative teaching for the allround growth of the mundane as well as spiritual aspects of life.

貹Ծṣa are invaluable repositiries of Vedic knowledge. These are supreme scripture of vedantic philosophy–containing the ultimate knowledge of individual soul and Brahman.

貹Ծṣa are also regarded as the source of multiple stream of Indian philosophy. The spiritual acumen and enlighten vision of the ṛṣ pervaded in the śǰ첹 and mantras of the 貹Ծṣa. Their massage is perennially inspiring and is as important and relevant to mankind today, as it was when first revealed in the Vedic age. 貹Ծṣa dignify human life as the greatest book of the almightily.

The 貹Ծṣa are perhaps the oldest and the most original discussions about the nature of the self and the mind in India. Traditionally they form a part of the Vedas. The Vedas have three main parts the ṃh the 󳾲ṇa and the Āṇy첹 (forest talks. The 貹Ծṣa belong to the last portion of the Āṇy첹. Therefore they are also called ձԳٲ (Veda + anta) meaning the end of the Vedas). There are quite a large number of 貹Ծṣa which cannot, from the point of view of their language be regarded to have been composed in the same age. Some of them are undoubtedly very old which are regarded as very ancient and most authoritative. They are: ś, Kena, , ʰśԲ, ѳṇḍ첹, ṇḍܰⲹ, Aitaereya, Taittrīya, Bṛhadāraṇyaka, Chāndagya and Śśٲ.[1]

Śaṃkarācārya, the great commentator of the Advaita school, has written commentaries on them. Other 貹Ծṣa which are more than hundred in number are called the minor 貹Ծṣa not account of size perhaps, but on account of their importance. Each 貹Ծṣa is more or less unique and independent of others. It contains philosophical and psychological speculations of some ancient teacher or teachers. The speculations are supposed to be based on actual experience of the great seers (Ṛṣ). They are so original and striking, yet so scattered and unrelated that it was thought necessary in later times to synthesize them into a system and this attempt gave birth the philosophy of the ձԳٲ of the several attempts in this direction, most of which are now extinct, one is well known. It is the 󳾲ūٰ or ձԳٲ sūtras of 岹ⲹṇa on which many great commentaries have been written by Śṅk峦ⲹ and others.

The word ձԳٲ means the end of the Veda. It has been use for the 貹Ծṣa which are the last portions of the Vedas. ձԳٲ is therefore, another name for the philosophy of the 貹Ծṣa. It is also called Uttara Mīmāṃsā, because it deals with the text of the 貹Ծṣa. The earliest text of this philosophy now in existence is the 󳾲ūٰ of 岹ⲹṇa which is also known as the ձԳٲsūtras. In course of time the 貹Ծṣa the 󲹲岵ī and the Brahma sūtras (ٳԲ-traya) came to be regarded as the basic works of ձԳٲ. Many great writers have written commentaries on them and laid foundation of several schools. One of these schools is the 屹ٲԳٲ (Doctrines of Monism). It is based on the �Ś첹 ṣy of Śrī Śṅk峦ⲹ on the 󳾲ūٰ. Śṅk峦ⲹ was great philosopher and lived a very short life towards the end of the 8th century or the beginning of the 9th, according to modern scholars and much earlier according to the tradition in India. Śṃk also wrote commentaries on the principal 貹Ծṣa and on the Bhagavad gītā and also wrote several other systematic treaties on the philosophy which his thought was based on the 貹Ծṣa.

The Advaita ձԳٲ school has flourished very much in India and a vast literature has been produced on it both in Sanskrit and in regional languages of India. Recently a lot of literature is being produced on ձԳٲ in English and other foreign languages also. Today, it will not be wrong to say thanks to the services rendered by Swami Vivekanada and Swami Ramatirtha and other Swamis of Śrī Rāma Kṛṣna mission, Advaita ձԳٲ has become the national philosophy of India. The ձԳٲ supplies more psychological data and theories than any other system of Indian thought does. Its analysis of the four types of human experiences and the doctrine of the self based on it is the greatest psychological contribution that India can make to the world psychology of the future.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

Mind and its function in Indian though, p.7.

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: