365bet

Vishnudharmottara Purana (Art and Architecture)

by Bhagyashree Sarma | 2021 | 59,457 words

This page relates ‘The Vishnudharmottara-purana: An Introductory Note� of the study on the elements of Art and Architecture according to the Vishnudharmottara Purana: an ancient text whose third book deals with various artisan themes such as Architecture, Painting, Dance, Grammar, etc. Many chapters are devoted to Hindu Temple architecture and the iconography of Deities and their installation rites and ceremonies.

Go directly to: Footnotes.

2. The վṣṇdharmottara-ܰṇa: An Introductory Note

The վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa is a voluminous ܰṇa which is mainly divided into three parts called ṇḍ. Each ṇḍ contains chapters called . Though վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa is not included in the lists of Upaܰṇas given by the Kūrmaܰṇa, Devībhāgavataܰṇa and Ekāmraܰṇa, the Bṛhaddharmaܰṇa includes this work in the list of Upaܰṇa.[1] It is important to note here that even though the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa is regarded as an Upaܰṇa, it has great academic and social value. Before going to make an elaborate discussion on the contents of this great work, some information about the date, authorship, subject matter, meaning of the title, importance etc. of this work are taken up here for discussion.

1. Date and Authorship:

Whenever the context of the date of ܰṇas comes forward, uncertainty prevails there. In the context of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa also a certain date of this work is not fixed anywhere. To know the exact time of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa, we have to go through a long discussion. The վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa is seen to be influenced by and this can be evidently proved from the fact that the 129th -137th chapter of the First ṇḍ of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa containing the story of ʳܰū and śī, which is the main theme of the drama named վDZśīⲹ of . Moreover, in the 208th Chapter of the First ṇḍ of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa, it is found that the women of the royal palace became so excited to have a glance of Bharata, which episode is also described in the 鲹ūṃśa.[2] Thus, the influence of the 鲹ūṃśa can be seen on the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa. Hence, it can be assumed that the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa cannot be earlier than 400 A.D. R.C. Hazra also agrees on it.[3]

Moreover, Matsyaܰṇa has contained various chapters such as chapter 115th -120th deal with the story of ʳܰū and śī, chapter 208th -214th comprises the story of 屹ٰī etc. which are seen to be borrowed from the 129th -137th chapters of first ṇḍ and 36th -41st Chapters of the second ṇḍ of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa respectively. So, it can be assumed that the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa must have been written not later than 600 A.D. R.C. Hazra also keeps his view point in the same way.[4] Again, in later period, various ṛt digest writers and ԾԻ󲹰 viz. Bhavadeva, Vijñāneśvara, īūٲ󲹲Բ, 貹첹, Aniruddhabhaṭṭa etc. also seem to mention the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa in various context of their works.[5] The Kālikāܰṇa of 11th Century also seems to be concern about the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa.[6] Moreover, in the ūdzٲ첹 of Śܱṇi it is stated that [7] and Śī첹[8] utilize the contents of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa in their treatises. According to P.V. Kane, the date of 첹 is 1100 A.D and Śī첹 had flourished somewhere between 800 to 1050 A.D.[9] So, from this it can be assumed that the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa gained a great popularity from 8th to 11th Century A.D. Moreover, the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa accepts ten incarnations of lord վṣṇ, where this work accepts ṛṣṇa and does not accept the Buddha . In this context an assumption arises that as վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa does not mention Buddha , this work does not belong to the earlier period of 500 A.D. as Buddha had been started to believe as an incarnation of վṣṇ not very much earlier than 500 A.D.[10]

Again, According to P.V. Kane the 3.40 verse of ʲśṛt is taken by the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa which is�

ٳ� 󳾲ṇaٲ� ye vahanti dvijātaya� /
pade pade
ṛtu phala� cānupūrvāllabhanti te//[11]

From this, it can be assumed that the age of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa relates to the era after the ʲśṛt i.e., 500 A.D. Priyabala Shah also agrees on it in the introductory note of her edition of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa.[12]

From the available information, it can be seen that the origin of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa cannot be earlier than 400 A.D. and later than 500 A.D. Bühler also states that the date of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa cannot be placed later than about 500 A.D.[13] R.C. Hazra also agrees on it.[14] So, it can be assumed that the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa relates vaguely the first half of 5th century A.D. and it had been flourishing to the 10th century A.D. M. Winternitz also keeps his view point in the same way in his work History of India Literature.[15]

Different ܰṇas contain different references regarding the authorship of the ܰṇas. According to the Matsyaܰṇa, the authorship of all the eighteen ܰṇas is attributed to ղ, the son of ٲⲹī.[16] The Vāyuܰṇa admits that ղ, the son of ʲś has composed the 貹ܰṇiī 첹ٳ i.e., the ancient narrative stories.[17] Thus the tradition would attribute all of the ܰṇas to ձ岹. From this practice it can be said that as a ܰṇa in nature, the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa also belongs to the collection of works authored by ձ岹. As the tradition relates that there may be more than one ղ, the same dictum can be applicable to the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa also.

2.Content:

The վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa contains different aspects of knowledge. Along with the narratives, this work bears immense information in various fields of study. The first ṇḍ of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa consists of 269 . The first ṇḍ contains the discussion about various subject matters such as Geographical account, Astronomy, Astrology, Religion, Politics, Chronography and Genealogies of kings and sages and their stories. Among the legends, the story of ʳܰū and śī is a remarkable one, which is depicted in the 130th -137th of the first ṇḍ of this work. Moreover, the first ṇḍ contains some rules and regulations of ś󲹲 and vratas. The stotras, dedicated to various deities are also compiled in this ṇḍ. The second ṇḍ comprises 183 , where mainly various aspects of dharma and Ჹīپ are nicely discussed. Here, the rules and regulations of four ś viz. brahmacarya, 󲹲ٳⲹ, vanaprastha and Բ are elaborately explained. Moreover, a few chapters of this ṇḍ are devoted to Astronomy and Medicine. The third ṇḍ contains 118 chapters which are dedicated to various contents such as Sanskrit and Prākṛt Grammar, Lexicology, Metrics, Poetics, Dance, Drama, Music, Painting, Iconography, Architecture etc.

3. The Title վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa:

As a specimen of ʳܰṇa literature, the term վṣṇdharmottara obviously follow the word ܰṇa. The term ṣṇdharmottaraܰṇa is an amalgamation of three words viz. ṣṇ, dharma and uttara. On the basis of the addition of the word ṣṇ here, this work is naturally included in the group of vaiṣṇavaܰṇas. The group of vaiṣṇavaܰṇa contains the ܰṇas viz. վṣṇ, īⲹ, 岵ٲ, Ҳḍa, Padma and ղ. Again, the eighteen Mahāܰṇas are divided into three groups viz. ٳٱ첹, Ჹ첹 and 峾첹 according to their qualities.[18] The vaiṣṇavaܰṇas possess the ٳٱ첹guṇa i.e., the quality of purity or goodness.[19] The վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa also belongs to the group of ٳٱ첹ܰṇa as it is a vaiṣṇavaܰṇa. Again, the word dharma is supposed to bear the meaning of quality[20] here. If the words ṣṇ and dharma are combined together, it comes as ṣṇdharma i.e., the quality of ṣṇ and in this way this work directly inclines to the quality of the վṣṇܱܰṇa. So, it can be said that the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa is an appendix of վṣṇܱܰṇa which has the similar qualities with վṣṇܱܰṇa.

Stella Kramrisch also agrees it the introduction of her work entitled The վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa Part IIIA.[21] The addition of the word uttara i.e., subsequent[22] in the title վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa clearly shows that վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa was a later work and it obviously came after the վṣṇܱܰṇa. Considering the word uttara as to mean later, it can be said that the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa had flourished during later period or so to say, it is closer to the modern period. The probability of being a composition of 5th to 7th century A.D. also proves this point of consideration.

4. Subject Matter and the Importance of the Tṛtīyaṇḍ of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa:

The Tṛtīyaṇḍ i.e., the third part of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa is fully dedicated to the discussion of different Art forms and Architecture. Besides Art and Architecture, a few chapters contain the discussion about Sanskrit and Prākṛt grammar, lexicology, metrics, poetics etc. The elements of different Art forms are discussed here elaborately and thoroughly, which can be considered as a great significance of this work. A point to be noted here is that most of the ܰṇas like the Liṅgaܰṇa, the Vāmanaܰṇa, the վṣṇܱܰṇa, the Agniܰṇa, the Brahmaܰṇa, the Brahmavaivartaܰṇa etc. contain the subject matter related to various Art forms. But the discussion found here appears to be a bit haphazard.

Eight books that discuss the matter systematically are:

  1. the Matsyaܰṇa,
  2. the Agniܰṇa,
  3. the Brahmāṇḍaܰṇa,
  4. the īⲹܰṇa,
  5. the Ҳḍaܰṇa,
  6. the Skandaܰṇa,
  7. the Bhaviṣyaܰṇa,
  8. the Vāyuܰṇa and
  9. the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa.

Among those the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa appears to be very pragmatic and systematic in this regard.

Though the whole work is regarded as very comprehensive, the Tṛtīyaṇḍ i.e., third part of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa appears to be a very special one. This part covers different Art forms viz. Music, Dance, Drama, Painting and Iconography and discusses each and every Art form in a very detailed manner. Moreover, Architecture remains a very pre-dominant concern of the third part of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa. The Architecture of Hindu temples of Indian Territory is nicely discussed in this work.

As it is already stated that the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa is an encyclopedic type of work, it bears a great importance both from content and context. In the perspective of the study of different subject matters like Astronomy, Astrology, Geography, Medicine, Politics etc., this work provides substantive information. As an appendix of the վṣṇܱܰṇa as well as a vaiṣṇavaܰṇa, this work has a religious aspect too. But basically, this work is totally free from Tāntric influence as it does not recommend Գٰ yantra as a medium of worship. Instead, this work promotes image worship and recitation of Vedic mantras both in vows and worship. R.C Hazra has offered his opinion in this line.[23] Along with different subject matters of different branches of knowledge, this work gives emphasis on different Art forms and Architecture. There are many ܰṇas which possess encyclopedic nature. But none of these have proclaimed the topics of Art and Architecture in the way in which the third part of the վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa has done. The վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa gives the ideas of different characteristic features of Drama, different elements of Drama, its execution etc. Different elements of Music, the gestures and postures of Dance are also very elaborately discussed here. This work has a systematic discussion on Temple building and Iconography. Moreover, this work comprises fullest account of various branches, methods and principles of Indian Painting. Actually, the systematic and improvised discussion of each and every subject makes this work very prominent and authoritative. Thus, this work can be taken as a reliable guidebook of different subject it has discussed. From this discussion the title of the work appears to be apt and effective. It corroborated with the subject matter in almost all aspects.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

tathāpyupapurāṇāni kathayāmi…�/ �.. ṣṇdharmottara� tathā…�.// Bṛhaddharmaܰṇa, 25.23-26

[2]:

tatastadālokanatatparāṇāṃ saudheṣu cāmīkarajālavatsu/ babhūvurittha� purasundarīṇāṃ tyaktānyakāryāṇi viceṣṭitāni// 鲹ūś, 7.5

[3]:

ā� R.C. Hazra, Studies in the Upapur as, Vol.1, p.206

[4]:

Ibid., p.210

[5]:

Ibid., p.207

[6]:

ṣṇdharmottare tantre ܱⲹ� ٲ� puna�/ Kālikāܰṇa, 92.2

[7]:

…�.ṣṇdharmottaravacanamātradarśinā bālakenātra viṣaye pūrvadine Բī ṛtⲹ�…�/ ūdzٲ첹, p.16, quoted by R.C. Hazra, Studies in the Upaܰṇas, Vol.1, p.209

[8]:

…� ṣṇdharmottaravacana� tu sandhipūjāviṣaya� iti śrīkaramiśra�/ Ibid., p.209

[9]:

P.V. Kane, History of ٳ󲹰śٰ, pp. 283-284 & 266-268

[10]:

R.C. Hazra, Studies in the Purāṇic Records, pp.41-42

[11]:

վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa, 2.7.2

[12]:

[...] Śrī-վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa, Third Part, p.10

[13]:

Indian Antiquity, Vol-XIX, p.408

[14]:

R.C. Hazra, Studies in the Upaܰṇas, p.206

[15]:

M.Winternitz, History of India Literature, Vol-1, p.580

[16]:

Matsyaܰṇa, 50.73

[17]:

貹śܳٴ ṛt 貹ܰṇiī� 첹ٳm/ sarvavedārthaghaṭitā� cintayāmāsa cetasi// Vāyuܰṇa, 104.20

[18]:

Thaneswar Sarma, Saṃskrit Sāhityar پṛtٲ, p.106

[19]:

M.Winternitz. The History of Indian Literature, Vol.1, p. 532

[20]:

V.S Apte, The Student’s Sanskrit-English Dictionary, p.268

[21]:

Stella Kramrisch, The վṣṇܻ󲹰dzٳٲܰṇa Part IIIA, Treatise on Indian Painting and Image Making Primary source edition, p.4

[22]:

V.S Apte, The Student’s Sanskrit-English Dictionary, p.101

[23]:

R. C. Hazra, Studies in the Upaܰṇas, Vol.1, p.218

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: