365bet娱乐

狈测腻测补艣腻蝉迟谤补 is renowned as ' 笔谤补尘腻峁嘺艣腻蝉迟谤补', and hence, the concept of sentence and sentence-meaning are not the only concern of it. As 闯补测补苍迟补产丑补峁�峁�补 states, the ancient 狈补颈测腻测颈办补蝉 did not give much importance to the discussions on language (1970, p.143). But it is to be noted that the School of Navya 狈测腻测补 took the matter seriously and made remarkable contribution in the study of language. For them, sentence is the collection of words and sentence-meaning is the collection of word-meanings. 艢腻产诲补产辞诲丑补 is the term they use to represent the cognition of the meaning of a sentence. It is already discussed that 狈补颈测腻测颈办补蝉 also admit the theory of 础产丑颈丑颈迟腻苍惫补测补, with a slight difference from that of the 叠丑腻峁�峁�补 School of 惭墨尘腻峁僺腻, to explain the process of verbal cognition. Thus, the mutual connection between the word-meanings or 蝉补峁僺补谤驳补 is the sentencemeaning.

In 碍腻谤颈办腻惫补濒墨, 痴颈艣惫补苍腻迟丑补 expounds the complete process of verbal cognition in a single verse:

辫补诲补箩帽腻苍补苍迟耻 办补谤补峁嘺峁� 诲惫腻谤补峁� tatra pad膩rthadh墨岣� 艣腻产诲补产辞诲丑补岣� 辫丑补濒补峁� tatra 艣补办迟颈dh墨岣� sahak膩ri峁嚹�.
  鈥�(1988, p.546)

尝补耻驳腻办峁�i 叠丑腻蝉办补谤补 states that the meaning of a sentence consists in the mutual relation of the meanings expressed by the words:

"padopasthit膩n膩峁� mitha岣� 蝉补峁僺补谤驳补岣� 惫腻办测腻谤迟丑补岣�",
  鈥�(罢补谤办补办补耻尘耻诲墨, 1886, p.44).

According to 闯补驳补诲墨艣补, sentence-meaning is the mutual relation of word-meanings, and in this relation, one meaning is correlated with another (艢补产诲补艣补办迟颈辫谤补办腻艣颈办腻, 2002, p.22). Thus, it is obvious that almost all scholars in the School of 狈测腻测补 accept the mutual relation of wordmeanings as the sentence-meaning. It must be noted that, according to this philosophy, sentence-meaning is not to be taken as the primary or secondary meanings of a sentence. It is because this school does not accept either the primary significatory power (艣补办迟颈) or the secondary one (濒补办峁�a峁嚹�) in a sentence. To the 狈补颈测腻测颈办补蝉, word is the meaningful unit of language and they express their primary meaning through 艣补办迟颈. 艢补办迟颈 is the will of God, which determines the meaning of the word:

"asm膩t pad膩dayamartho boddhavya it墨艣varecch膩 艣补办迟颈岣�",
  鈥�(罢补谤办补蝉补峁単谤补丑补, 1971, p.151).

Navya 狈补颈测腻测颈办补蝉 describe 艣补办迟颈 as the will of the speaker, which assigns the meaning to the word.

Though the ancient works of the 狈测腻测补 School did not emphasize on the discussions related with language studies, later texts like 艢补产诲补艣补办迟颈辫谤补办腻艣颈办腻, 痴测耻迟辫补迟迟颈惫腻诲补, 狈测腻测补ma帽jar墨, 叠丑腻峁Ｄ乺补迟苍补尘 etc. give special stress on 狈补颈测腻测颈办补's view about the complex phenomenon of verbal cognition. In the 狈测腻测补 tradition, Jayanta, the author of 狈腻测补尘补帽箩补谤墨, was the first, who elaborately discuss the concept of sentence-meaning. In this work, he discussed the theories of verbal comprehension in detail.

He refers to diverse views held by the preceptors:

"tatra vipratipatti艣ca 产补丑耻谤奴辫腻 惫颈辫补艣肠颈迟腻尘",
  鈥�(1970, p.300),

And rejects all these views.

Besides, he also refutes the Grammarians' theory of 笔谤补迟颈产丑腻, 础苍惫颈迟腻产丑颈诲丑腻苍补惫腻诲补 and 础产丑颈丑颈迟腻苍惫补测补v膩da (1970, p.335). After rejecting all these views, Jayanta introduces a unique idea about the cognition of sentence-meaning, known as ' 迟腻迟辫补谤测补惫腻诲补'. According to him, the word 迟腻迟辫补谤测补 signifies the power of word which conveys the related meaning of the words in a sentence. Thus Jayanta states that 迟腻迟辫补谤测补 is the cause of the cognition of sentence meaning. In Navya 狈测腻测补, this power of words is called '蝉补峁僺补谤驳补mary膩d膩'. In the School of Navya 狈测腻测补, this term refers to the syntactic expectancy of words (腻办腻峁卥峁Ｄ�).

Gad膩dharabha峁�峁璦 remarks that the meaning of a sentence, which is the relation that exists among the individual meanings of the words, is put forth by the 蝉补峁僺补谤驳补mary膩d膩 or the syntactic expectancy:

"ekapad膩rthe' parapad膩rthasya 蝉补峁僺补谤驳补岣� 蝉补峁僺补谤驳补mary膩day膩 bh膩sate",
  鈥�(痴测耻迟辫补迟迟颈惫腻诲补, 1973, p.1).

Thus 狈补颈测腻测颈办补蝉 reject all the different views regarding the verbal comprehension of a sentence presented by the other systems such as Grammar, 惭墨尘腻峁僺腻 etc. They maintain that the verb in a sentence is not important, but the nominative substantive (辫谤补迟丑补尘腻苍迟腻谤迟丑补) is the primary substantive (尘耻办丑测补惫颈艣别峁�y补) in the sentence. All the remaining parts in a sentence are the qualifiers of that word^[1].

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

This view if Nayayikas will be explained later under 2.5.2