365bet娱乐

224
艢iva Pur膩峁嘺 have been regarded as Vai峁ａ箛ava Pur膩峁嘺s. And for
Vai峁ａ箛avites, the Bh膩gavata Pur膩峁嘺 and the Hariva峁兣沘 Pur膩峁嘺 are more
authoritative. That is why, it should be considered here that Trivikrama
Pandita being an ardent follower of Mahva's Vai峁ａ箛avism, should have
regarded the Bh膩gavata Pur膩峁嘺 and the Harivamsa as the prime sources
of the U峁Ｄ乭ara峁嘺-k膩vya.
While going through the Pur膩峁噄c texts mentioned above, one does
find some variant readings: (1) The Padma Pur膩峁嘺 accounts that
Lord K峁涐梗峁嘺 removes 艢iva's stupification at the request of P膩rvati.2
(2) The Siva Pur膩峁嘺 states that when B膩n膩sura passed the order to kill
Aniruddha, he listened to the divine voice and consequently retired from
killing him.鲁 (3) In the 艢iva Pur膩峁嘺, it may be noted that Vai峁ａ箛avajvara
submits to Lord Siva. However, the Siva Pur膩峁嘺 upholds 艢iva's
supremacy; and hence Vai峁ａ箛avaivara's surrendering to Siva holds good in
the context. (4) The Harivamsa describes that Aniruddha prayed Durg膩
to get himself free from the clutches of serpent-cords and he succeeded.
His prayer in the Hariva峁兣沘 is known as 鈥樐�ry膩stava'. (5) Further, the
Hariva峁兣沘 makes a note of worthy consideration that Lord Hari and
Lord Hara are glorified as one and the same godhead. This identity is
of course here a unique one.
These are the remarkable variant readings adding to the main story
of U峁Ｄ� and Aniruddha. But none of the variant readings is given scope
in the U峁Ｄ乭ara峁嘺-k膩vya by Trivikrama Pa峁囜笉ita. Nevertheless poet's
narration of the story runs through various interesting descriptions
enriched with poetical conceits.
2.
WN
Infra., p. 77
3. Infra., p. 43