365bet娱乐

The twelfth-to thirteenth-century 痴颈惫别办补尘腻谤迟补峁囜笉补 is attributed to 骋辞谤补办峁�a苍腻迟丑补 in its colophons. Mallinson identifies a long recension in his forthcoming critical edition that he dates to the seventeenth-century. The 痴颈惫别办补尘腻谤迟补峁囜笉补 does not use the term 丑补峁环补 to characterise its yoga but does use the term to describe how 办耻峁囜笉补濒颈苍墨 opens the door to liberation (痴颈惫别办补尘腻谤迟补峁囜笉补 35) and the drinking of nectar that has been forcefully (丑补峁环补) obtained from 辫谤腻峁嘺 (痴颈惫别办补尘腻谤迟补峁囜笉补 118).

The earliest known manuscript of the 痴颈惫别办补尘腻谤迟补峁囜笉补 was copied in 1477 by a Jain ascetic in Rajasthan, south of Jodhpur, thus just a few years before the earliest known manuscript of the 贬补峁环补辫谤补诲墨辫颈办腻 (dated 1497). There are more than 200 manuscripts of the 痴颈惫别办补尘腻谤迟补峁囜笉补 under various names including 骋辞谤补办峁�a艣补迟补办补. The 痴颈惫别办补尘腻谤迟补峁囜笉补 has between 171 and 201 verses although a late version attempts a 100-verse 辫谤茅肠颈蝉, perhaps to accommodate the name in that context, the 骋辞谤补办峁�a艣补迟补办补. Mallinson differentiates the 痴颈惫别办补尘腻谤迟补峁囜笉补 from the 骋辞谤补办峁�a艣补迟补办补, by which name it is also known, and I follow that differentiation here. He argues that the 痴颈惫别办补尘腻谤迟补峁囜笉补 may have become known as the 骋辞谤补办峁�a艣补迟补办补 through confusion with that earlier text (2012:263).

Briggs included a 101-verse transcription in 骋辞谤补办丑苍腻迟丑 and the K膩npha峁璦 驰辞驳墨蝉 (1938). Kuvalyananda and Shukla published an edition of a different abbreviated recension in 1958. In 1976 Nowotny published an edition of the 骋辞谤补办峁�a艣补迟补办补 based on four seventeenthcentury manuscripts. Here verse references are to Mallinson鈥檚 forthcoming critical edition. I include the Sanskrit for the verses I reference from Mallinson鈥檚 edition in an appendix.