Contribution of Vachaspati-Mishra to Samkhya System
by Sasikumar. B | 2017 | 35,637 words
This page relates ‘Sankhya System� of the research on the Sankhya [Samkhya] school of Indian philosophy with special reference to the contribution of Vachaspati-Mishra. The study includes concepts such as Epistemology (validity and worth of knowledge), Ontology (theory of being or reality), Psychology (science of behavior and mind), Phenomenology (the philosophical study of the structures of experience and consciousness) and Ethics (the removal of errors), all forming an essential part of Samkhya philosophy.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Chapter 3.1 - The ṅkⲹ System
Tradition regards Kapila as the founder of ṅkⲹ Philosophy. Īsvarakṛsṇa’s ṅkⲹkārikā seems to be the earliest available and the most popular work of this system. Besides this Ҳḍa岹’s ṅkⲹkārikābhāṣya, 峦貹پ Ѿś’s ṅkⲹtattvakaumudī and Vijñānabhikṣu’s ṅkⲹpravacanabhāṣya is very much relevant in this system. The ṅkⲹ is an exponent of dualistic realism. It agrees with the īṃs System in vehemently criticizing the ⲹ-ղśṣi첹 theism and strongly advocating atheism. The ṅkⲹ of the Ѳٲ is theistic. The Classical ṅkⲹ System is atheistic. The Yoga System grafts theism on the ṅkⲹ metaphysics, and is therefore called ‘theistic ṅkⲹ�.
The word ṅkⲹ
The word ṅkⲹ is derived from the word �ṅk�. The word ṅk is used in the sense of thinking and counting �䲹 ṅkvicāraṇ�.�[1] Thinking may be with reference to basic principles or knowledge of self. Counting refers to the twenty-four principles. The double implication of the word has been set forth by Vijñānabhikṣu in his preface to ṅkⲹpravacanabhāṣya, by a quotation from the Ѳٲ:
"ṃk� prakurvate caiva ṛt� ca pracakṣate tattvāni ca caturviṃśastena ṃkⲹ� prakīrtitam |"
So, ṅkⲹ means knowledge of self through right discrimination. Garbe is of opinion that the word ṅkⲹ was originally used in the sense of counting, and it was then applied to the system of Kapila which enumerates the twenty-five principles.[2] ṅkⲹ means the philosophy of right knowledge. Right knowledge is the knowledge of the separation of the ʳܰṣa from the ʰṛt.
ṅkⲹkārikā, the basic text of ṅkⲹtattvakaumudī
The ṅkⲹkārikā is hardly a “philosophical� text as that designation is understood in an Indian Intellectual environment. There is very little of the polemical give and take so typical of 岹śԲ or philosophical literature. Instead, the ṅkⲹkārikā is a philosophical poem, laying out the contours of the ṅkⲹ System in a related and artful manner. It presents its content in serious and elegant �� verses that flow easily and make use of striking similes and metaphors throughout.[3] If the term ‘岹śԲ� is to be taken in its original sense as an “intuitive seeing� that nurtures a quiet wisdom and invites ongoing thoughtful meditations then surely the ṅkⲹkārikā must stand as one of the most remarkable productions of its class. In any case, the seventy verses of Īśvarakṛṣṇa have been remarkably influential both as a summary of the ṅkⲹ’s contribution to India's philosophical and cultural heritage. ṅkⲹtattvakaumudī of 峦貹پ Ѿś stands out as the oldest extant explication of ṅkⲹkārikā
Place of ṅkⲹtattvakaumudī
ṅkⲹtattvakaumudī of 峦貹پ Ѿś is a fairly simple and straight forward exposition of the ṅkⲹkārikā The text has been historically very important, however, for it has inspired a long tradition of sub commentaries coming down to the present day. So this commentary became a milestone in the development of ṅkⲹ literature and philosophy. G.J. Larson opines that “According to 峦貹پ Ѿś, ṅkⲹ had the double effect of, on the one level, decisively destroying the old ṅkⲹ dualism, but, on another level, of reviving and refurbishing many of the old ṅkⲹ notions, this latter effect helps to explain, why an important thinker like 峦貹پ Ѿś, composed a major commentary on the ṅkⲹkārikā in the ninth or tenth century. His work on ṅkⲹ actually inaugurated an independent tradition�.[4] Moreover, it is fair to say that it is by far the best-known text of ṅkⲹ all over India. It is noted that 峦貹پ Ѿś’s reading of ṅkⲹ is more than a little influence by the emerging and in the sense it should be distinguished from Pre-峧ṅkⲹ and Pātañjala-ṅkⲹ. For convenience it can be designated simply as -ܻܳī-ṅkⲹ, that’s to say, the ṅkⲹkārikā as read through 峦貹پ Ѿś’s ṅkⲹtattvakaumudī Many of the ṅkⲹ texts after the tenth century are based on 峦貹پ Ѿś’s reading on ṅkⲹkārikā The most important among them are Vaṃśīdhara’s Tattvavibhākara, Ჹ Yati’s Tattvapradīpa, Śṛ� Bhārati Yati’s ṅkⲹtattvakaumudīvyākhyā, ʲñԲԲ ղ첹ٲԲ’s ūṇi etc. works ranging from the 17th to the 20th centuries.
ṅkⲹtattvakaumudī of 峦貹پ Ѿś starts with the salutation[5] of ʰṛt and ʳܰṣa, which are the eternal principles of ṅkⲹ System. This ‘maṅgalaśloka� is more or less similar to the �mantra� in Śśٲ 貹Ծṣa [6] ṅkⲹtattvakaumudī is the word by word interpretations of ṅkⲹkārikā In it, he adopted the analytical method of interpretation. For the clarity he includes his own ideas where ever necessary. Pramāṇanirūpaṇa in ṅkⲹkārikā is an example. Īśvarakṛṣṇa states that ṇa are three. There are no further explanations about that. But 峦貹پ Ѿś elaborately explained the definitions of the three ṇa and also he included the other ṇa in the three.[7] In his commentary he includes the views of other philosophers like īṃs첹, 첹, Buddhas and Naiyyāyikas as ū貹ṣa and refuted their concepts. Etymological explanations are widely used.
This is also very helpful to understand the deep philosophical concepts. For example:
The contribution of 峦貹پ to ṅkⲹ philosophy made far reaching effects in the later development of ṅkⲹ System. That was at once multifaceted and multifarious. For the convenience of the study the same may be classified into five major topics such as Epistemology, Ontology, Psychology, Phenomenology and Ethics.
Footnotes and references:
[3]:
matiryasya so'ya� "āryamati�" iti| ṅkⲹtattvakaumudī 71
[4]:
Encyclopedia of Indian Philosophies, Vol. IV, p.301
[5]:
ajāmekā� lohitaśuklakṛṣṇāṃ bahvī� prajā� sṛjamānā� namāmaḥ|
ajā ye tā� juṣamāṇāṃ bhajante jahatyenā� bhuktabhogā� numastān|
[6]:
Śśٲ 貹Ծṣa.IV.5
[7]: