The concept of Mind in the Major Upanishads
by Gisha K. Narayanan | 2018 | 35,220 words
This page relates ‘The Concept of Mind in the Aitareyopanishad� of the study on the concept of Mind as found in the Major Upanishads: the philosophical backbone of the four Vedas. This study explores the various characteristics and psychological aspects of the mind (described by the Seers of ancient India thousands of years ago) including awareness (samjna), understanding (vijnana) and knowledge (prajnana).
Go directly to: Footnotes.
9(a). The Concept of Mind in the Aitareyopaniṣad
The Aitareya-ܱ貹Ծṣa properly so-called is only a part of the larger Aitareya Āṇy첹 beginning with the fourth section of the second chapter of the Āṇy첹 and going to the end of that chapter. It consists of three chapters all of which are important. It proclaims another of the four 屹ⲹ, �Brahman is pure conscousness�.[1] The first chapter gives us the secret of creation. Everything has been created out of the Atman or the Brahman. The second chapter lets us know of the three births of a man or the Atman. The Creator desired to continue this art of creation.
The third chapter deals with the nature of Atman:
o� vāṅmemanasi pratiṣṭhitā mano me vāci pratiṣṭhitam māvirāvīrma edhi vedasya ma āṇīstha� śܳٲ� me mā prahāsīranenādhītena ahorātrān sandadhāmyṛta� vadiṣyāmi | ٲⲹ� vadiṣyāmi tanmāmavatu tadvaktāramavatvavatu māmavatu vaktāram avatu vaktāram | o� śԳپ� śԳپ� śԳپ� || [2]
The Aitareya-ܱ貹Ծṣa contains the 屹ⲹ, Prajñānam Brahma, consciousness is Brahman. According to this view, consciousness is neither an adjunct nor an evolute, but it has the essential nature of the Absolute. If consciousness does not manifest itself, it is due to some limitation in the organism or in the situation.
The formation of mind is explained by this Upaniṣad. The act of creation is a part of Atman or the duty of Atman. It is both the cause and effect. The whole world is made Upaniṣad of the five elements viz., space, air, fire, water and earth. The knowledge of Atman constitutes his wishes to have a mouth. Out of that mouth emerges the organ of speech; and then fire and air emerged. In the same manner, the universal human form, virat has two eyes, two ears and skin and their deities.
The deity of the inner sense, Գٲḥkṇa, is called the mind that emerges in the manner:
ٲⲹٲ貹ٳٲٲٲⲹ ܰ� nirabhidyata yathāṇḍam | mukhādvāgvāco'gnirnāsikenirabhidyetā� nāsikābhyā� ṇa� prāṇādyuyurakṣiṇi nirabhidyetāmakṣibhyā� cakṣuścakṣuṣa 徱ٲⲹ� karṇai nirabhidyetā� kārṇābhyā� śdzٰ� śrotrād diśastvaṅnirabhidyata tvaco lomāni lomabhya oṣadhivanaspatayo ṛdⲹ� nirabhidyata hṛdayātmano manasaśԻ nābhirnirabhidyata nābhyā apāno'pānānmṛtyu� śśԲ� nirabhidyata śiśnādroto ٲ� āpa� |[3]
Śī Ś첹 commends on this in his ṣy;
yathā pakṣiṇo'ṇḍa� nirabhidyataitam | tasmānnirbhinnānmukhādvākkaraṇamidriya� niravartata tadadhiṣṭhāta'gnistato vāco ǰ첹� tathā nāsikenirabhidyetām | nāsikābhyā� ṇa� prāṇādvāyuriti sarvatrādhiṣṭhāna� 첹ṇa� 𱹲 ca ٰⲹ� krameṇa nirbhinnamiti | akṣīṇi karṇaitvagdhṛdayamantakaraṇādhiṣṭhāna� mano'nta첹ṇa� � sarvaprāṇabandhanasthana� tasmādapānasaṃyuktatvādapāna iti pāyvindriyamucyate |[4]
Again this Upaniṣad explains mind as the central factor:
agnirvāgūٱ ܰ� prāviśadvāyu� prāṇoūٱ nāsike prāviśadādityaścakṣurūٱ'kṣiṇ� prāviśad徱ś� śdzٰ� ūٱ kaṇau prāviśannoṣadhivanaspatayo lomāni ūٱ ٱ� prāviśaṃścadramā manoūٱ ṛdⲹ� prāviśan mṛtyurapāno ūٱ � praviśadāpo reto ūٱ śśԲ� prāviśan || [5]
In his commentary Śī Ś첹 says:
vāyurnāsikeādityo akṣiṇi 徱ś� kaṇau oṣadhivanaspatayasٱ� Ի ṛdⲹ� mṛtyur� āpa� śśԲ� prāviśan || [6]
The knower of the Atman and the knowing object are the same as mentioned. Hence the duality is of no veracity.
This Upaniṣad considers manas as a material and inert substance that cannot function without Atman. Awareness [ṃjñ], comprehension [ñԲ�], understanding [ñԲ�], knowledge [prñԲṃ], retentiveness [], insight [dṛuṣṭiḥ], resolution [dṛutiḥ], opinion [پ�], memory [ṛt�], reflection [īṣ�], impulse [jutiḥ], will [ṃk貹�], purposed [ٳ�], life ڲḥ], desire [峾], control [ś] etc are the names of mind or knowledge [prñԲṃ]. These are regarded as different names of our intellectual experiences.
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
Aitareya-ܱ貹Ծṣa-5.3
[3]:
Aitareya-ܱ貹Ծṣa-1.1.4
[4]:
Aitareyopaniṣad Śānkaraṣy-1.1.4
[5]:
Aitareya-ܱ貹Ծṣa-1.2.4
[6]:
Aitareyopaniṣad Śānkaraṣy-1.2.4