Ashta Nayikas and Dance Forms (study)
by V. Dwaritha | 2013 | 71,711 words
This page relates ‘Parakiya type of woman character� of the study dealing with the Ashta-Nayikas—a classification of eight kinds of “Heroines� representing the eight emotional states (avastha) employed in the classical Indian dance and performing arts (otherwise known as Natya Shastra). These Ashtanayikas reflect the eight types of romantic relationships and have hence formed the expressive subject of many classical painting, poems and dramatic plays.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Part 4.2 - The ʲī type of woman character
She belongs to another hero. ʲī, Բ, Բⲹٰī, ʲٰī, are a few terms attributed to her.
परकीया द्वेधा कन्यका परोढ� चेति �
parakīyā dvedhā kanyakā paroḍhā ceti |[1]
This ʲī is divided into two; -Բ and the ʲḍh.
तत्र कन्यात्वनूढा स्यात् सलज्जा पितृपालिता �
सखीकेलिषु विस्रब्ध� प्रायो मुग्धागुणान्विता �tatra kanyātvanūḍhā syāt salajjā pitṛpālitā |
sakhīkeliṣu visrabdhā prāyo mugdhāguṇānvitā ||[2]
If a girl under the headship of her father falls in love with a man, then she is a Բ ʲī as she is not the hero’s own. She is an example of Ayoga Śṛṅ. She is still under the directives of her father and has to give prime importance to him. It is also to be remembered that she could be married away to another man by her father and then she would not belong to the hero. This ⾱ is called the Բ or the ūḍh. This ⾱ could either marry the man of her love and become his ī or marry another man and continue her love affair with her paramour as his ʲī.
ʲḍh is the next variety in a ʲī.
अन्योढाप� तथैतत्सर्व� कुरुतेऽनुरागमापन्न� �
नायकमभियुङ्क्त� सा प्रगल्भभावेन पुरतश्� �anyoḍhāpi tathaitatsarva� kurute'nurāgamāpannā |
ⲹ첹mabhiyuṅkte sā pragalbhabhāvena purataśca ||[3]यात्रादिनिरताऽन्योढा कुलट� गलितत्रप� �
yātrādiniratā'nyoḍhā kulaṭ� galitatrapā ||[4]
Devotion to one’s husband was a prerequisite to attain heaven. The īپ śٰ of ancient India do not find place for passion and illicit enjoyment. Infidelity was not a trait of the ٳٲ. In fact these kinds of deceitful characters were not even supposed to be principal characters in great works.
धूर्तचरित्रतयै� � महाकविप्रबन्धवाच्य� �
dhūrtacaritratayaiva na mahākaviprabandhavācyā |[5]
परपरिणीता नायिका मुख्यरसे उदाहर्तुमयोग्य� �
अनूढ� कन्यका तु गौणमुख्य� � रस� उदाहर्तु� योग्येत्यर्थ� �parapariṇītā ⾱ mukhyarase udāhartumayogyā |
anūḍhā kanyakā tu gauṇamukhye ca rase udāhartu� yogyetyartha� |[6]
“In fact, adultery has been seriously dealt with in Indian scriptures long since the bold declaration of the Chāndogya Upaniṣad (V.10.9), where it has been branded as one of the five great sins.�[7] This kind of ʲī does not get a mention in Bharata’s ṭyśٰ. The first mention of her is in ܻṭa’s 屹ṅk. Poets say that a ī wishes for union, while the ʲī wishes for both union and money and the 峾Բ wishes for only money.
This was how a ʲī was thought about.
भोगेप्सव� स्यु� स्वीयाश्चेदन्य� भोगधनेप्सव� �
अर्थेप्सवः स्युर्गणिकास्तास्तथा वर्णयेत्कविः �bhogepsava� syu� svīyāścedanyā bhogadhanepsava� ||
arthepsava� syurgaṇikāstāstathā varṇayetkavi� |[8]
The end of the 11th century saw a sea of change in the colour of ʲī. �Sanskrit secular poem takes a profound mystical turn in the ղṣṇ lyrics, where ʲī becomes a key to salvation, and the seat of all siddhi (ڱپDz).�[9] Jayadeva, վ貹پ and 䲹ṇḍī were the primary sanctifiers of ʲī. was identified with the eternal ʲī who loves the man other than her husband.
In their lyrics, is considered a ʲḍh who has to face many hardships when she goes to meet ṛṣṇa.
“T power and single mindedness of her love for ṛṣṇa render her oblivious to the hardships through which she must pass on her way to meet him (ṛṣṇa).�[10]
“Denial by the society creates a challenging zest in the ʲī. Adultery in which physical possession becomes a sheer impossibility, is, therefore, conceived as an apt ideal for delineating this clandestine relationship of and ṛṣṇa.�[11] “T love between the DZī (particularly ) and Krishna has been delineated as the love of the real woman for a real man.�[12]
She had a husband and family for which she was answerable in this world, while she wished a union with the ʲٳ (ⲹ첹). She was the īٳ yearning to merge with the 貹ٳ.
A unique classification of ʲḍh is given in 鲹ñᲹī:
गुप्ता-लक्षित�-विदग्ध�-कुलट�-ऽनुशयाना-मुदिता-प्रभृतीना� परकीयायामेवान्तर्भाव� � गुप्ता त्रिविधा-वृत्�-सुरतगोपन�, वर्तिष्यमाणसुरतगोपना वृत्तवर्तिष्यमाण-सुरतगोपन� � �
guptā-lakṣitā-vidagdhā-kulaṭ�-'nuśayānā-muditā-prabhṛtīnā� parakīyāyāmevāntarbhāva� | guptā trividhā-vṛtta-suratagopanā, vartiṣyamāṇasuratagopanā vṛttavartiṣyamāṇa-suratagopanā ca |[13]
ҳܱ is one who conceals. She is of three types -the one who conceals past affairs, the one who conceals future affairs and the one who conceals both.
विदग्ध� � द्विविधा क्रियाविदग्ध� वाग्विदग्ध� � �
vidagdhā ca dvividhā kriyāvidagdhā vāgvidagdhā ca |[14]
վ岹 is a clever woman. She is of two types–clever in action and clever in speech. ṣi is one whose affair is disclosed or known to the whole world. ܱṭ� is an unchaste woman.
सा तु अनुशयाना त्रिविधा भवति � वर्तमानस्थनविघटनेन भाविस्थनाभावशङ्कया स्वानधिष्ठित� सङ्केतस्थल� प्रत� भर्तुरागमनानागमनेन � �
sā tu anuśayānā trividhā bhavati | vartamānasthanavighaṭanena bhāvisthanābhāvaśaṅkayā svānadhiṣṭhita� saṅketasthala� prati bharturāgamanānāgamanena ca |[15]
Գś is the one who is associated to the meeting place. She is of three types -the one whose present meeting place is destroyed, the one whose future meeting place is destroyed and the one who is unable to reach the meeting place and is anxiously thinking that the hero has already arrived. ѳܻ徱 is one who is happy at her success in love. Բⲹ is an unmarried girl.
Total number of ʲī ⾱-Though it was just seen that there are so many more divisions in a ʲī, these are not widely accepted, thus boiling down to the divisions being just two-Բ and ʲḍh.
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
鲹첹, 14.
[2]:
鲹ṇaܻ첹, I. cvii. 28.
[3]:
屹ṅk, XII. xxxvi. 385.
[4]:
Sāhitya Darpaṇa, III. lxvi. 193.
[5]:
鲹첹, 15.
[7]:
Mystic eros, 78.
[8]:
屹śԲ, IV. cxlvi. 135.
[9]:
Dash, Mystic eros, 183.
[10]:
Yvonne yazbeck Haddad and Ellison Banks Findly, eds., Women,Religion and Social Change (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1985), 228, www.questia.com.
[11]:
Mystic eros, 180, 189.
[13]:
鲹ñᲹī, 71.
[14]:
Ibid., 75.
[15]:
Ibid., 81.