Vakyapadiya of Bhartrihari
by K. A. Subramania Iyer | 1965 | 391,768 words
The English translation of the Vakyapadiya by Bhartrihari including commentary extracts and notes. The Vakyapadiya is an ancient Sanskrit text dealing with the philosophy of language. Bhartrhari authored this book in three parts and propounds his theory of Sphotavada (sphota-vada) which understands language as consisting of bursts of sounds conveyi...
This book contains Sanskrit text which you should never take for granted as transcription mistakes are always possible. Always confer with the final source and/or manuscript.
Verse 3.14.130
Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation of verse 3.14.130:
संज्ञाविषयभेदार्थं प्रसक्तादर्शनं स्मृतम� �
क्षूयमाण� तु वचनं विशिष्टमुपलभ्यते � १३� �saṃjñāviṣayabhedārtha� prasaktādarśana� smṛtam |
kṣūyamāṇa� tu vacana� viśiṣṭamupalabhyate || 130 ||130. In order to determine the scope of the name ‘elision, (lopa)�, it has been defined as the non-perception of what would otherwise come to be. But an element expressive of a particular number is actually heard (in the analytical sentence, 屹ⲹ.)
Commentary
If the case-endings do not come to be at all, how can operations depending upon their existence take place even by P. 1.1.62.?
[Read verse 130 above]
[The case-ending is heard in the sentences actually used in life, but as its meaning does not exist in the ṛtپ, the case-ending does not come to be. If it does not come to be at all, how is it prasakta, something that is due to come to be? It is the nonperception of what is due to come to be which is called elision (ٲ岹śԲ� DZ貹�). The very fact that elision (luk) is taught (P. 2. 4. 71.) shows that it was due. That it was due is shown in the analytical sentence which is similar to what is actually used in life and is the source (ṛt) of the complex formation. In this analytical sentence, the case-endings are actually present and they stand for particular numbers and they are elided by P. 2. 4. 71. In spite of the elision, the effect of the case-ending can be seen in the compound which is formed. One effect of the case-ending is the understanding of a particular number from the complex formation and that is what happens in 屹첹, ܳⲹ etc. Thus it has been shown that even according to the view that in abhedaikatva, particular numbers are not merged but completely disappear, a particular number is sometimes understood from the ṛtپ through its own expressive element.]
But this view is defective.