Brihad Bhagavatamrita (commentary)
by Śī Śīmad Bhaktivedānta Nārāyana Gosvāmī Mahārāja | 2005 | 440,179 words | ISBN-13: 9781935428329
The Brihad-bhagavatamrita Verse 2.3.53, English translation, including commentary (Dig-darshini-tika): an important Vaishnava text dealing with the importance of devotional service. The Brihad-bhagavatamrita, although an indepent Sanskrit work, covers the essential teachings of the Shrimad Bhagavatam (Bhagavata-purana). This is verse 2.3.53 contained in Chapter 3—Bhajana (loving service)—of Part two (prathama-khanda).
Verse 2.3.53
Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration, Word-for-word and English translation of verse 2.3.53:
जगद्-विलक्षणैश्वर्य� मुक्�-वर्गाधिकोऽपि सन� �
लक्ष्यतेऽत�-सद�-आचार� मह�-विषयवान् इव � ५३ �jagad-ṣaṇaiśvaryo mukta-vargādhiko'pi san |
ṣyٱ'ti-sad-ācāro mahā-viṣayavān iva || 53 ||jagat–to the material world; ṣaṇa–eٰǰ徱Բ; śⲹ�–oܱԳ; mukta–of liberated souls; varga–than the assembly; 첹�–sܱǰ; api–e; san–bԲ; ṣyٱ–aԲ; پ-峦�–transcendental to the codes of good conduct; 屹ṣaⲹ-–a great sensualist; iva–l.
His distinctive opulences far surpassed anything of this world. Although he is far superior to all liberated souls, at the same time, he gave the impression of being a great hedonist who transgresses virtuous conduct.
Commentary: Dig-darśinī-ṭīkā with Bhāvānuvāda
(By Śīla Sanātana Gosvāmī himself including a deep purport of that commentary)
Śī Gopa-ܳ continues, “That person, with his incomparable power and opulences, was extraordinary and distinct from this world. Still, he seemed to transgress the boundaries of acceptable behavior. He was fully renounced and naked, yet he always kept his beloved on his lap. He was the best of liberated personalities, freed from any connection to sense objects, yet he was using luxuries of a great enjoyer, such as an umbrella and yak-tail fans. Therefore, all his opulence and majesty seemed extraordinary and surprising.� Here the word iva, meaning ‘as if,� factually refutes the possibility of his being a hedonist. This becomes apparent when one deliberates on the truth about him. “He was the Supreme Lord, or ʲś, who protects religious principles, but he seemed to be violating societal norms. Additionally, the nature he exhibited was that of a highly liberated person, yet he was enjoying sense objects. I became very surprised to observe such peculiar behavior.�