A History of Indian Philosophy Volume 1
by Surendranath Dasgupta | 1922 | 212,082 words | ISBN-13: 9788120804081
This page describes the philosophy of samkhya atheism and yoga theism: a concept having historical value dating from ancient India. This is the eighteenth part in the series called the “the kapila and the patanjala samkhya (yoga)�, originally composed by Surendranath Dasgupta in the early 20th century.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Part 18 - ṃkⲹ Atheism and Yoga Theism
Granted that the interchange of the positions of the infinite number of reals produce all the world and its transformations; whence comes this fixed order of the universe, the fixed order of cause and effect, the fixed order of the so-called barriers which prevent the transformation of any cause into any effect or the first disturbance of the equilibrium of the ṛt? ṃkⲹ denies the existence of īś (God) or any other exterior influence, and holds that there is an inherent tendency in these reals which guides all their movements. This tendency or teleology demands that the movements of the reals should be in such a manner that they may render some service to the souls either in the direction of enjoyment or salvation.
It is by the natural course of such a tendency that ṛt is disturbed, and the ṇa develop on two lines—on the mental plane, citta or mind comprising the sense faculties, and on the objective plane as material objects; and it is in fulfilment of the demands of this tendency that on the one hand take place subjective experiences as the changes of the buddhi and on the other the infinite modes of the changes of objective things. It is this tendency to be of service to the ܰṣa (ܰṣārٳ) that guides all the movements of the reals, restrains all disorder, renders the world a fit object of experience, and finally rouses them to turn back from the world and seek to attain liberation from the association of ṛt and its gratuitous service, which causes us all this trouble of ṃs.
Yoga here asks, how the blind tendency of the non-intelligent ṛt can bring forth this order and harmony of the universe, how can it determine what course of evolution will be of the best service to the ܰṣa, how can it remove its own barriers and lend itself to the evolutionary process from the state of ṛt equilibrium? How too can this blind tendency so regulate the evolutionary order that all men must suffer pains according to their bad karmas, and happiness according to their good ones? There must be some intelligent Being who should help the course of evolution in such a way that this system of order and harmony may be attained. This Being is īś.
īś is a ܰṣa who had never been subject to ignorance, afflictions, or passions. His body is of pure sattva quality which can never be touched by ignorance. He is all knowledge and all powerful. He has a permanent wish that those barriers in the course of the evolution of the reals by which the evolution of the ṇa may best serve the double interest of the ܰṣa’s experience (bhoga) and liberation (apavarga) should be removed. It is according to this permanent will of īś that the proper barriers are removed and the ṇa follow naturally an intelligent course of evolution for the service of the best interests of the ܰṣa.
Īśvara has not created the ṛt; he only disturbs the equilibrium of the ṛt in its quiescent state, and later on helps it to follow an intelligent order by which the fruits of karma are properly distributed and the order of the world is brought about. This acknowledgement of īś in Yoga and its denial by ṃkⲹ marks the main theoretic difference between the two according to which the Yoga and ṃkⲹ are distinguished as Seśvara ṃkⲹ (ṃkⲹ with īś) and Nirīś ṃkⲹ (Atheistic ṃkⲹ)[1].
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
ղٳٱśī, IV. 3; Yogavārttika, l. 24; and ʰԲṣy, V. 1-12.