365bet

Preksha meditation: History and Methods

by Samani Pratibha Pragya | 2016 | 111,074 words

This page relates ‘Conclusion� of study dealing with Preksha-Dhyana: a meditation technique created by Acharya Shri Mahapragya (Acarya Mahaprajna) in the late twentieth century. It synthesizes ancient Jain ascetic methods, ritualistic practices, and modern scientific insights, appealing to a global audience. The thesis explores its historical context, theoretical foundations, and the rise of contemporary Jain meditation systems.

Go directly to: Footnotes.

The thesis of this thesis elucidated in the preceding chapters is that ṣ�-Բ is a modern form of Jaina meditation, which is different from the ancient Jaina meditative practices. It is unlike those of Ѳ屹ī as recorded in the Āṅg-ūٰ, as well as subsequent developments of Jaina meditation as a four–fold system, medieval conceptualisation of Jaina meditation by Haribhadra (8th c. CE) using the model of eight-fold views (ṛṣṭi) and the medieval adoption of four-fold tantric meditation. Furthermore, ṣ�-Բ is even distinct from the early meditations, which developed in the Terāpanth sect. We have seen that Mahāprajña outlined ṣ�-Բ on a scientific basis, including various aspects from Hindu and Buddhist meditation techniques and involving ܰ徱 and astronomical elements.

Chapter two demonstrated that Jainism can, in fact, claim the existence of an ascetic tradition of meditational practice since the time of Ѳ屹ī in the 5th c. BCE. However, it is clear that the extreme forms of physical asceticism present in early Jainism, noted by Bronkhorst and in early Buddhist literature, and the earliest forms of Jaina meditational practice such as motionlessness and solitary practices are quite different from the characteristically non-ascetic features of ṣ�-Բ. It is observed that from the 1st c. CE, meditational practices in the Āśⲹ첹-Ծܰپ and later literature on dzٲ are presented in a new and highly developed fashion, including complex categorizations pertaining to various aspects of dzٲ’s theory and practice. This literature records a shift in the characteristics of meditation from being a tool that is purely liberation-focused to one that can also be applied to more worldly goals, e.g. as a means of religious interaction with a god or goddess, for worldly assistance or other mundane boons.

Asceticism and meditation cannot be viewed as separate practices in the early period. Rather, they were intertwined. With time, the four-fold categorisation of meditation evolved in later forms of Jaina meditational practices as stages of psychological development, moral conduct and scriptural learning, which are found in late canonical and classical Jainism, starting from the Āṅg-ūٰ and Sūtrakṛtāṅgaūٰ. These forms of meditation are fundamentally different from the tantric and ritual characteristics of medieval Jaina meditation. Thus, during the time of Haribhadra (8th c. CE) and Hemacandra (12th c. CE), there is a sharp shift in Jaina meditational practice and understanding, which is discussed by Qvarnström (2002) and Chapple (2003). Many tantric elements were incorporated into Jainism during this period, which were instrumental in the later development of ṣ�-Բ. Thus, mainstream Hindu tantric elements are mirrored in Mahāprajña’a ṣ�-Բ system. For example, the notion of “coiled power� (ṇḍī) is translated by him under the title “internal journey� (Գٲٰ), the system of “wheels� (cakra) or “lotuses� (kamala) is reinterpreted as “psychic centers�, (caitanya kendra), “colour visualisation� (-ṇ�) is referred to as “colour meditation� (ś) and the “fixing� of mantra syllables on various parts of the body (mantra-Բ). In this respect, ṣ�-Բ represents an attempt to develop a new model of meditation, infused with tantric elements, which is compatible with modern science and includes an empirical understanding of phenomena that brings tangible benefits of health and well-being (Pratibhāprajñā, 2015: 8). Medicalised meditative practices were already started by Kuvalayānanda, which is discussed by Alter (2004). Yogendra (1897�1989) also experimented with Բ, ṇ峾 in his clinical work with patients (Alter, 2014: 37). Meditation in Terāpanth also presents ancient meditative practices of dzٲ and , which were a part of Jaina asceticism.

The first part of chapter three looked at meditative developments in the early Terāpanth (1760�1881). From the time of the first 峦ⲹ 󾱰ṣu (1726�1803) right up to ⲹԻ岹 (1790�1851), the first to third heads of the Terāpanth sect, there is no written record of lay or ascetic meditation practices besides ritualistic meditative forms, such dzٲ and . Jay峦ⲹ (1803�1881), the fourth head of the Terāpanth sect, contributed three compositions on meditation even though his system of meditation remains confined largely to ascetics to fulfil the soteriological aims, which are believed to have influenced Mahāprajña in the development of ṣ�-Բ.

The second part of chapter three described the evolving process of ṣ�-Բ between 1944-1975 due to the motivation of ճܱī and the personal quest of Mahāprajña. It clearly revealed that the developmental process of ṣ�-Բ was not a quick fix. Goenkā’s influence on the development of ṣ�-Բ can only be traced to 1974-75. Within these years Satya ⲹԲ Goenkā organised three camps for Terāpanthi ascetics. Mahāprajña accepted that the practices at the camps proved instrumental in recapturing this lost link of the Jaina meditation system, which he considered to be the greatest benefit of the camp (Mahāprajña 1983: 81�84). These comments of Mahāprajña are a clear indication that the practice of brought clarity to and an understanding of Jaina meditative practices, which are in the ūٰ style in canonical texts. However, this does not mean that the system was copied. One tradition may help another to understand the lost meaning of various concepts. The Jain, Buddhist and Hindu traditions verily influenced each other. I have refuted Goenkā’s claim that ṣ�-Բ is nothing more than “modified � and shown that the claim has no solid basis to it.

ʰṣ�-Բ is rooted in Jaina classical, medieval and premodern canonical sources. However, Mahāprajña made it clear that Goenkā’s meditation assisted him to understand the lost meditative practice of Āṅg-sutra, which is the oldest document of Ѳ屹ī’s meditative practice. There are ample similarities noted by Mahāprajña in Jaina and Buddhist meditative practices as both traditions had stemmed from śṇa culture to which Ѳ屹ī and Buddha both belonged. These two traditions flourished from the same province of “Greater Magadha�. Furthermore, there are philosophical and practical differences in both practices, which are mentioned in chapter three. Therefore, it is evident that Goenkā’s claim that ṣāԲ� is a copy of has no solid ground. Chapter four demonstrated the seven sources of the building blocks of ṣ�-Բ to dispel the misconception that ṣāԲ� is a modification of Goenkā’s .

Chapter four analysed the initiation and development of ṣ�-Բ in the Terāpanth sect through the efforts of ճܱī (1913�1997) who composed ѲԴDzԳśԲ (Instruction into the mind) and his disciple and spiritual heir Mahāprajña (1920�2010), who dedicated 30 years of his life to the research, self-experiments and development of ṣ�-Բ. Mahāprajña began meditative practices at an early age in 1944. His quest to trace the practices of Ѳ屹ī through canonical literature and experience them in his own practice paved the way for the formation and development of the ṣ� method under ճܱī’s guidance and encouragement. Theory and practice of ṣ�-Բ was expounded in Mahāprajña’s (1975�2010) works, especially those on Jaina yoga and meditation. Later, as ṣ�-Բ evolved, Mahāprajña opened it to the laity.

According to ճܱī and Mahāprajña, ṣ�-Բ is beyond any doubt whatsoever, rooted in Jaina canon and connected to the practices of Ѳ屹ī in Āṅg-ūٰ 1.9. Thus, scriptural authority of canonical and classical literature grants it authenticity and legitimacy. It was noted that Mahāprajña developed ṣ�-Բ meditation based on ancient practices mentioned in Jaina canonical texts as well as under the influence of Hindu yogic systems, Goenkā’s method of meditation and modern scientific links in the very last phase of ṣ�-Բ.

Synthesising original canonical elements with new interpretations and modern innovations appears to have created, in this case, an effective modern meditative tool geared to the “purification of the psyche�, promoting health and well-being, as well as the attainment of the ultimate goal of liberation, and so appealing to laity and monastics alike. It is observed that ṣ�-Բ is not only appealing to the domestic Indian population but also to a global audience.[1]

Chapter five discussed six modern forms of Jaina meditation and argued that these present a renewed representation of ancient and medieval forms of meditation in a modern guise. It showed that yoga had a butterfly effect on all Ś峾 sects, bringing them to the forefront of the worldwide yoga movement. My main purpose is to compare and contrast all these modern Jaina meditations, which were developed during the last quarter of 20th century and 21st century with ṣ�-Բ.

All six systems aim at the “purification� of one's soul based on Jaina karma theory. Each discusses some of the physical, mental and emotional benefits of their system of meditation, and share common terms based in modern Hindu yoga terminology. Modernisation in the case of these systems may be seen in their mode of presentation, modern yoga terminology and shared tantric practices that are aimed at both monastics and the laity, and often at Jainas and non-Jainas alike.

In the context of the history of Jaina meditation, ṣ�-Բ represents a new departure in which Mahāprajña investigated Jaina canonical and classical texts, narratives, rituals, institutions, and ideologies, as well as Hindu sources, modern Buddhist practice, and Western medical science and therapies, in the modern context. He synthesized these materials during the twenty-five years of personal practice, based on his study and personal meditative experiences, and produced seminal material, including texts, in the form of a detailed system of ṣ�-Բ specially adapted to the modern period, which was officially launched in 1975 in Jaipur. This was the first time in the history of Jainism that a system of Jaina meditation based on a precise methodology was formulated and presented to the general public.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

There are many ṣ� Meditation centres across the world. Many activities such as ʰṣ� Internation camps, samaṇī’s over sea journey to organize study classes, workshops on ʰṣ�-Բ.

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: