Preksha meditation: History and Methods
by Samani Pratibha Pragya | 2016 | 111,074 words
This page relates ‘Introduction (the Terapantha sect)� of study dealing with Preksha-Dhyana: a meditation technique created by Acharya Shri Mahapragya (Acarya Mahaprajna) in the late twentieth century. It synthesizes ancient Jain ascetic methods, ritualistic practices, and modern scientific insights, appealing to a global audience. The thesis explores its historical context, theoretical foundations, and the rise of contemporary Jain meditation systems.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
1. Introduction (the ձ貹Գٳ sect)
This chapter explores the history of meditation in the ձ貹Գٳ sect. There has been little by way of analysis of the role of meditation in Jaina sects, including the prehistory and the formative phase of ṣ�-Բ, a gap which this chapter addresses. It investigates the nature and prevalence of meditative practices of ձ貹Գٳ monks immediately before[1] and after the establishment of the ձ貹Գٳ sect and those practices which were influential in the evolution of ṣ�-Բ.
This chapter consists of three main parts. The first part examines early meditative ձ貹Գٳ practices from 1760�1881. This includes the practices of holding-the-breath meditation (sāṅsa rūndha Բ) of ṣu (1726�1803), the penance of standing or lying down bare-bodied to take deliberate exposure of the midday blazing sun (貹) of ṣu and his fellow monks, the abandonment of the body (dzٲ) of Hemarāja (1773�1848) and Jayācārya’s (1803�1881) two compositions on meditation. Through the examination of such precursors, the foundation of the meditative practices that underpin ṣ�-Բ will be explained and analysed, with the aim of answering key questions related to the development of meditation in the ձ貹Գٳ tradition.
The second part of the chapter explores the evolution of ṣ�-Բ and the effects of modernisation during the time of ճܱī[2] (1913�1997) and Mahāprajña (1920�2010) from 1944�1975. An explanation of Mahāprajña’s yogic and meditative practices since 1944, including ճܱī’s expressed concern for developing a Jaina meditation system in 1962, will be considered, to postulate the foundation of ṣ�-Բ. Importantly, this discussion starts with the pre-ṣ�-Բ camps (ś) by ճܱī and Mahāprajña as well as their innovative approaches that gained traction within the ձ貹Գٳ community and later grew beyond boundaries both nationally and internationally.
I have adopted, in this thesis, the term ‘Jaina modernism�[3] to describe the emergence of entirely new forms of meditation in the ձ貹Գٳ tradition. This refers, in particular, to the contributions of ճܱī and his motivations for creating a distinct type of Jaina meditation. Mahāprajña’s development of this distinctly Jaina form of meditation is discussed in depth, including his personal meditative techniques of mantra, posture (Բ), breath control (ṇ峾), hand and body gestures (ܻ), various bodily locks (bandha), meditation (Բ) and reflection (屹). I will examine Mahāprajña’s meditative experiences and his use of textual and non-textual sources in the development of ṣ�-Բ, as well as the impact of his encounter with S. N. Goenkā’s 貹 camp in 1974-75. Finally, I will explore the formulation and official launch of Mahāprajña’s ṣ�-Բ in 1975.
Sources
The development of the ṣ�-Բ practice will be examined using the comprehensive volumes on the history of the ձ貹Գٳ[4] sect by Muni Buddhamal (1920�2007), Jaya AnuśԲ (1981a) by Jayācārya and a series on the history of ascetics of the ձ貹Գٳ tradition called �ŚԲ Samudra� (26 parts) by Muni Navaratnamala (1921�2004). The diaries of ճܱī and Mahāprajña, their biographies, autobiographies and other historical sources in the archives of the old ձ貹Գٳ library (ṇḍ) at Lāḍanū� were carefully examined to investigate the reasons which prompted them to initiate ṣ�-Բ. In addition, recorded audio-tape interviews were conducted in India with traditional Jaina scholars who were Mahāprajña’s early collaborators. These early collaborators included monks, nuns and lay followers of the ձ貹Գٳ sect. These interviewees are a valuable resource for gaining new and little known insights into the genesis of ṣ�-Բ, particularly in the formative phase of its development.
Footnotes and references:
[3]:
‘Jaina modernism� introduced by Peter Flügel, see (2007, 2012a).