A study of the philosophy of Jainism
by Deepa Baruah | 2017 | 46,858 words
This page describes the Time of Prabhacandra (Jaina philosopher) from the study of the philosophy of Jainism: one of the oldest religions in India having its own metaphysics, philosophy and ethics. Jainism is regarded as an ethical system where non-violence features as an important ethical value.
Chapter I.f - Time of Prabhācandra (Jaina philosopher)
Prabhācandra was a Jaina philosopher. He is also a grammarian. But no detail information is found about his life and time. From his book ʰⲹ첹ٲṇḍ, it is known about the name of his guru and the place where he has written his work. Padmanandisaiddhānta was his guru. From his work, it can also be known that Prabhācandra written this book in Dhārānagarīwhere ruled Bhojadeva.
Though his time has not been mentioned in his work, yet his date can be approximately fixed from internal and external sources. Jinasena, the author of Ā徱ܰṇa stated the name and time of a Prabhācandra, who wrote Candrodaya. From the name of Candrodaya, it is presumed that the work is ⲹܻܳ岹Ի of Prabhācandra. But this view is not accepted by all. The original name of the work is ⲹܻܳ岹Ի not Candrodaya. Hence, these scholars say that the author of ⲹܻܳ岹Ի and Candrodaya are not the same. Jinasena completed the commentary of Jayadhavalā of his guru īԲ in 759 A.D. and after that he completed Ā徱ܰṇa in 840A.D. For that reason, every scholar accepted the time of Prabhācandra between 8 century and 9 century A.D. But there are some doubts about this time. Firstly some arguments are put below for this reason:
1. One of the most famous ʳܰṇa, i.e., Ჹṃśaܰṇa was written by Jinasena in 783 A.D. It was earlier than the Ā徱ܰṇa. In that ʳܰṇa he mentioned the name of one Prabhācandra who was a pupil of Kumārasena and also described him as the author of Candrodaya like the Ā徱ܰṇa. From this description, it can be presumed that these two Prabhācandras of Ჹṃśaܰṇa and Ā徱ܰṇa are the same person and a pupil of Kumārasena. So, Prabhācandra, the greatest philosophical author of ʰⲹ첹ٲṇḍ and ⲹܻܳ岹Ի is different from that Prabhācandra, found in the two ʳܰṇas, because the name of his guru is Padmanandisaiddhānta and not of Kumārasena.
2. The writers who followed Akalaṅka such as Vidyānanda and Anantavīrya are mentioned by Prabhācandra in his work. But the author of Ā徱ܰṇa, i.e., Jinasena does not mention the name of Vidyānanda and Anantavīrya in his work. These two writers also do not belong earlier than 9 century A.D. If Prabhācandra belonged earlier than 9 century A.D., and then it is not possible for him to mention the name of Vidyānanda and Anantavīrya in his work. So, Prabhācandra does not belong earlier than 9 century A.D.
From the above arguments, it can be said that the author of Candrodaya, i.e., Prabhācandra is not the Prabhācandra of ʰⲹ첹ٲṇḍ, and the time of Prabhācandra that is mentioned in the Ā徱ܰṇa is not acceptable for the present author.
3. ղdzīṭi of ղdzś is one of the important works of Vaiśeṣika philosophy. The nature of liberation and its refutation as found in the ղdzīṭi of ղdzś are also found in the ʰⲹ첹ٲṇḍ of Prabhācandra.ղdzś belonged to 7 century A.D. So, Prabhācandra belongs later.
4. Śākaṭāyana, a follower of Jainism is the author of Ś첹ṭҲԲ첹ṇa, Kevalibhukti and Śٰīܰپ첹ṇa. He wrote a commentary on Ś첹ṭҲԲ첹ṇa by the name of Dzṛtپ. This commentary was written in the time of the king Dzṣa. The time of king Dzṣa was between 814 A.D. to 877 A.D. Prabhācandra mentioned Śٰīܰپ첹ṇa of Śākaṭāyana in his famous logical works ʰⲹ첹ٲṇḍ and ⲹܻܳ岹Ի. From that point, it can be said that Prabhācandra cannot belong earlier than 9 century A.D.
5. One of the most famous works on Nyāya philosophy is ⲹñᲹī of Jayantabhaṭṭa. In ⲹñᲹī, Jayantabhaṭṭa explains 첹첹ⲹ岹. This 첹첹ⲹ岹 is refuted by Prabhācandra in his ʰⲹ첹ٲṇḍ. Jayantabhaṭṭa mentioned the name of Vācaspati Ѿś, the author of ٱ貹ⲹṭīk and ⲹūīԾԻ in his work. Vācaspati Ѿś completed ⲹūīԾԻ in 841 A.D. For that reason, Jayantabhaṭṭa must belong to 9 century A.D. So, Prabhācandra’s date must be later than 9 century A.D.
6. Devasena is one of the great historical authors or followers of Jainism. He was the writer of famous work called ٲśԲ. He completed this work in 933 A.D. After that he wrote another work 屹ṃg in 940 A.D. In ʰⲹ첹ٲṇḍ, Prabhācandra mentioned a śǰ첹 from 屹ṃg in connection with explaining the 𱹲. If Prabhācandra’s date is taken to be earlier than 9 century A.D., then this reference to 屹ṃg will not possible.
7. Abhayanandi, one of the famous authors of Jainism has written ԱԻ屹ṛtپ, which is a work on ԱԻ첹ṇa in 960 A.D. Ś峾Ჹ첹 (a work on ԱԻ첹ṇa) was written by Prabhācandra. On this ground, Prabhācandra was later than 960 A.D.
8. Śī is one of the famous authors of Vaiśeṣika philosophy. He wrote a commentary on ʰśٲ岹ṣy called ⲹ첹Ի岹ī in 991 A.D. In ʰⲹ첹ٲṇḍ, Prabhācandra mentioned the Vaiśeṣika work ⲹ첹Ի岹ī while explaining the nature of liberation. So, Prabhācandra cannot be earlier than Śī.
9. Vādirāja, the famous author and follower of Jainism was the writer of śٲ. Vādirāja completed this work in 1025 A.D. He composed a commentary ⲹԾśⲹṇa on ⲹԾśⲹ첹ṇa of Akalaṅka. Vādirāja does not mention Prabhācandra and his work ʰⲹ첹ٲṇḍ in his śٲ. This implies that Prabhācandra was later than Vādirāja. Hence, Prabhācandra’s date must be later than 1025 A.D.
10. 屹岹ٲ첹, the famous work of Jainism was written by Vādidevasūri in 1118 A.D. He mentioned this famous logical work ʰⲹ첹ٲṇḍ in his work. Hence, Prabhācandra was earlier than Vādidevasūri.
11. Malliṣeṇa is one of the Jaina philosophers. He was the author of 屹岹ñᲹī, which was completed in 1293 A.D. In 屹岹ñᲹī, he mentioned Prabhācandra and his work ⲹܻܳ岹Ի. So, Prabhācandra was earlier than Malliṣeṇa.
12. Hemacandra is the most versatile Jaina writer. He belonged to 12th century. The ʰṇaīṃs is a valuable work on Jaina logic by Hemacandra. Hemacandra mentioned ʰⲹ첹ٲṇḍ and his author Prabhācandra in his work. From that point of view Prabhācandra was earlier than Hemacandra.
13. Another author of Nyāya philosophy is Abhinavadharmabhūṣaṇa. He has written ⲹī辱 in 1384 A.D. He mentioned ʰⲹ첹ٲṇḍ and his author Prabhācandra in his work. Hence, Prabhācandra’s date cannot be later than that of Abhinavadharmabhūṣaṇa.
From foregoing discussions, it is evident that Prabhācandra does not belong earlier than 11 century A.D. and later than 12 century A.D. In the absence of more definite information it be surmised that Prabhācandra belonged to the later part of 11 century A.D. or earlier part of 12 century A.D.
Works of Prabhācandra:
Prabhācandra is the author of ʰⲹ첹ٲṇḍ which is one of the most important works on Jaina philosophy. Prabhācandra wrote a book called Prabhavakacarita, in which the life histories of the Jaina philosophers are discussed.
It contains a biography of twenty-two Jaina philosophers starting from Vajrasvāmi (4 century A.D.), Siddhasena پ첹 (5 century A.D.) to Hemacandra (12 century A.D.) Another important work of Prabhācandra is ⲹܻܳ岹Ի which is a commentary on Dzīⲹٰⲹ of Akalaṅka. Other works of Prabhācandra’s are: Ā첹ٳś (a commentary on Āٰ첹ٳԻ), Ā貹ñᾱ (a commentary on ī), ղٳٱٳṛtپ貹岹ṇa (a commentary on ٳ of Pujyapāda), Ś첹ṭҲԲԲ (a commentary on Ś첹ṭҲԲ첹ṇa of Śākaṭāyana), Ś峾Ჹ첹 (a work on ԱԻ첹ṇa), ʰԲᲹ첹 (a commentary on ʰԲ of Kundakunda) and Ҳⲹ첹ٳś. These commentaries are very voluminous and deal with the Jaina system in details.