365bet娱乐

131
Jan., 1966] SAKHAS OF THE SAMAVEDA IN THE PURA峁咥S
variation from the extant Samhita". On this ground the existence
of a separate Samhita of this S膩kh膩 may be argued. From a
reference of the N膩rada Sik峁Ｄ� it seems that originally the Tandya
Br膩hma峁嘺 was accented 80. At present except the Br膩hma峁嘺, no
text is available.
(16) THE TALAVAK膧RA 艢膧KH膧
Talavak膩ra was a pupil of Jaimini and he founded his own
艢膩kh膩. Perhaps he re-arranged his teacher's works, viz. Jaimini-
ya Br膩hma峁嘺, which also bears the name Talava k膩ra Br膩hma峁嘺.
P膩峁噄ni has mentioned him in the Saunak膩diga峁嘺 as an author of
the Chandas or the Vedic Sakh膩. Talavak膩ra is mentioned in
the Jaiminiya Grhya Sutra. The Talavak膩ra Aranyaka is
divided into four Adhy膩yas and 145 Khandas.
(17) THE KALABAVIN 艢膧KH膧
In the Gobhila Grhyakarma Prak膩艣ik膩 K膩labavin is
mentioned among the ten S膩ma-pravacanak膩ras. The Br膩hma峁嘺
of the K膩labavins is frequently referred to in the Kalpa Sutras.
According to the Pu峁�pa-Sutra the Br膩hma峁嘺 text of the K膩labavins
was accented 8. Prof. Max M眉ller thinks it not necessary that the
Brahma峁嘺 was accented 88. No literature of this Sakh膩 is preserved.
(18) RURUKI 艢膧KH膧
Ruru R峁�i is also mentioned among the ten S盲mapravacana-
k膩ras. The Ruruki Br膩hma峁嘺 is mentioned in the commentary
on the Dr膩hy膩ya峁嘺 艢rauta Sutra. No literature is handed down.
79. Vaidika V膩帽maya k膩 Itihasa, Vol. I, P. 323
80. N膩rada-Siksa I. 13
81. Dr. V. S. Agrawala : India as known to P膩峁噄ni, P. 339.
82. Puspa Sutra 8. 8
83. "The passage of the puspa-S奴tra (VIII. 8) which was quoted before
does not prove that the rules on the accent were laid down in the
Br膩hma峁嘺s of the Kalabavins, because it may also mean that the
accented delivery of the sacred texts was enjoined in the Br膩hma峁嘺"
History of Ancient Skt. Lit., p. 59. ft.
84. Dhanvis Com. on the Dr膩hy膩ya峁嘺 S奴tra (V. 3. 1.)