365bet娱乐

212
啶�啷佮ぐ啶距ぃ啶�啷� - [pur膩峁嘺m - ] 笔鲍搁膧狈础
[Vol. IV, No. 1
story in the SK. version, however, embodies and adapts a quite
different story viz. the story of Jamadagni, Re峁噓k膩 and their
son Para艣ur膩ma. It will be recalled that in the original story
Re峁噓k膩 was accused of guilt similar to that of the mother of
C.: Re峁噓k膩 was found guilty of gazing at a Gandharva King
for which the indignant Jamadagni ordered Parasurama, one of
his sons, to behead his mother. Parasurama instantly carried
out the command of his father. Para艣ur膩ma was not, however,
devoid of filial love towards his mother; for, he asked a boon
from his father who was pleased with his dutiful son that his
mother should be restored back to life, without retaining any
memory of her having been beheaded by her son. The SK.
version, while following the Jamadagni-Re峁噓 k膩 model, deviates
from it in putting C. in place of Para艣ur膩ma and in making
him put off the execution of the father's order until the father
arrives on the scene.
The main import of the C. story is, no doubt, its im-
pressive emphasis on the advisability of reflection before action
or of thoughtful action. It may be said to be a good illustra-
tion of the famous verse in this behalf of Bh膩ravi:1
啶膏す啶膏ぞ 啶掂た啶︵ぇ啷�啶� 啶� 啶曕�嵿ぐ啶苦く啶距ぎ啷� 啶呧さ啶苦さ啷囙�曕�� 啶�啶班ぎ啶距お啶︵ぞ啶� 啶�啶︵ぎ啷� 啷�
啶掂�冟ぃ啶む�� 啶灌た 啶掂た啶�啷冟ざ啷嵿く啶曕ぞ啶班た啶｀�� 啶椸�佮ぃ啶侧�佮が啷嵿ぇ啶距�� 啶膏�嵿さ啶�啶�啷囙�� 啶膏�傕お啶︵�� 啷�
[sahas膩 vidadh墨ta na kriy膩m aviveka岣� param膩pad膩峁� padam |
v峁涐箛ate hi vim峁浥泍ak膩ri峁嘺峁� gu峁嘺lubdh膩岣� svayameba sa峁僷ada岣� ||
] In fact N膩rada, in the version of the SK. given above,
while setting out to relate the story of C., appears to echo
the very words of the above stanza in the verse-
啶膏す啶膏ぞ 啶� 啶曕�嵿ぐ啶苦く啶距�� 啶曕�佮ぐ啷嵿く啶距い啷� 啶�啶︵ぎ啷囙い啶ㄠ�嵿ぎ啶灌ぞ啶�啶︵ぞ啶�啷� 啷�
啶掂た啶�啷冟ざ啷嵿く啶曕ぞ啶班た啶｀�� 啶о��啶班�� 啶掂�冟ぃ啶む�� 啶膏ぐ啷嵿さ啶膏�傕お啶︵�� 啷�
[sahas膩 na kriy膩峁� kury膩t padametanmah膩pad膩m |
vim峁浥泍ak膩ri峁嘺峁� dh墨ra峁� v峁涐箛ate sarvasa峁僷ada岣� ||
] already quoted in Footnote 6. The above verse in the
SK. followed by the story of C. in the sequel equates, in
effect, 啶氞た啶班�曕ぞ啶班た啶ㄠ�� [肠颈谤补办腻谤颈苍 ] with 啶掂た啶�啷冟ざ啷嵿く啶曕ぞ啶班た啶ㄠ�� [惫颈尘峁浥泍补办腻谤颈苍 ] and sets forth an opposition, as
in Bh膩ravi's verse, between 啶膏す啶膏ぞ 啶曕�嵿ぐ啶苦く啶距�� 啶曕�佮ぐ啷嵿く啶距い啷� [sahas膩 kriy膩峁� kury膩t ] and 啶掂た啶�啷冟ざ啷嵿く啶曕ぞ啶班た啶む�嵿さ. [惫颈尘峁浥泍补办腻谤颈迟惫补. ] It
may be pointed out that Mbh. version nowhere expresses such
opposition in explicit terms.
1. Kiratarjuniyam II. 30.