Yajnavalkya-smriti (Vyavaharadhyaya)—Critical study
by Kalita Nabanita | 2017 | 87,413 words
This page relates ‘Offences Related to the King and His Power� of the study on the Vyavaharadhyaya of the Yajnavalkya-smriti: one of the most prominent Smritis dealing with Dharmashastra (ancient Indian science of law), dating to the 1st century B.C. The Yajnavalkyasmriti scientifically arranges its contents in three sections: Acara (proper conduct), Vyavahara (proper law) and Prayashcitta (expiation). Vyavahara deals with judicial procedure and legal system such as substantive law and procedural law.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Chapter 4.5 - Offences Related to the King and His Power
In every nation, the offences related to the state are considered of serious nature. The ³Õ²â²¹±¹²¹³óÄå°ùÄå»å³ó²âÄå²â²¹ states some of the offences committed against the royalty. Most of them are included in the title of law called ±è°ù²¹°ìÄ«°ùṇa°ì²¹. The ²Ñ¾±³ÙÄå°ìá¹£a°ùÄå explains that the disputes, which have reference to the transgression or the obedience of the king’s commands comprise the title of law called ±è°ù²¹°ìÄ«°ùṇa°ì²¹, as such these are closely connected with the king. Therefore, the king himself gets the authority to assume the role of a contending party against such persons and decide the suit.[1]
Indulging in talks affecting the interests of royalty, vilifying the king, disclosing his secret counsels, are the offences against the government, mentioned in the ³Õ²â²¹±¹²¹³óÄå°ùÄå»å³ó²âÄå²â²¹. The punishment for these offences is cutting off the tongue and banishment.[2] Sitting on a royal car or throne is regarded as an offence, for which the highest form of pecuniary penalty is imposed.[3] Robert Lingat observes that these offences denote a different aspect of the royal activity, where the king finding out the wrongdoer applies chastisement to them in the name of the state. In some aspects, it resembles police activity of government.[4] The king has the power of reviewing judicial proceeding, if a suit is wrongly decided and he can decide legally after careful investigation. In such case, the king can punish the assessors along with the party, who wins through unfair means, with the penalty of twice the amount of the fine, prescribed for the defeated party.[5] Having carnal intercourse with a wife of the king is considered a grave offence. Such an offender is burnt down with the fire of ±¹Ä«°ù²¹á¹‡a grass.[6]
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
prakÄ«rṇake vivÄdapade ye vivÄdÄ rÄjÄjñollaá¹…ghanatadÄjñÄkaraṇÄdiviá¹£ayÄste ²Ôá¹›p²¹sanavÄyiṇaá¸�/ ²Ôá¹›p²¹ eva tatra smá¹›tyÄcÄravyapetamÄrge vartamÄnÄnÄá¹� pratikÅ«latÄmÄsthÄya vyavahÄranirṇayaá¹� kuryÄt/ ²Ñ¾±³ÙÄå°ìá¹£a°ùÄå,Ibid., 2.295
[2]:
rÄjño’niá¹£á¹apravaktÄraá¹� tasyaivÄkroÅ›akÄriṇam/ tanmantrarya ca bhettÄraá¹� chittvÄ Âá¾±³ó±¹Äåá¹� pravÄsayet// YÄjñavalkyasmá¹›ti, 2.302
[3]:
rÄjayÄnÄsanÄsanÄroá¸hurdaṇá¸a uttamasÄharaá¸�// Ibid., 2.303
[4]:
Vide, Lingat, R., Op.cit., page 237
[5]:
durdṛṣá¹Äṃsta punardṛṣá¹vÄ vyavahÄrÄnná¹›peṇa tu/ ²õ²¹²ú³ó²âÄåá¸� sajÄ«yano daṇá¸yÄ vivÄdÄddviguṇaá¹� damam// YÄjñavalkyasmá¹›ti, 2.305
[6]:
rÄjapatnyabhigÄmÄ« ca dagdhavyÄstu kaá¹ÄgninÄ// Ibid., 2.282