365bet娱乐

tr SOME LOST UPAPUR膧峁咥S 507 later than the Tantra-s膩ra. As in no other work known
to us there is any reference to or quotation from the 'Madhavi-
pur膩峁嘺', we do not know whether there was at all any
Upapur膩峁嘺 bearing this title. It is highly probable that
the reading 鈥榤膩dhav墨-pur膩峁噀' in Bhairava's work is a
scribal mistake for 'm膩dhaviye pur膩峁噀' and that the verse,
ascribed to the 'Madhavi-pur膩峁嘺', was derived from some
work of Madhav膩c膩rya. This probability gains ground
when we see that this verse has been quoted in M膩dhav膩-
c膩rya's commentary (I. i, p. 441) on the Par膩艣ara-sm峁泃i
with the words "pur膩峁噀 'pi", and that at another place
(fol. 1b) in the Acara-nir峁嘺ya-bh膩skara-samgraha a verse
(brahma-mur膩ris tripur膩ntak膩r墨 etc.=V膩mana-p. 14. 23)
has been quoted with the words 'm膩dhaviye pur膩峁噀', evi-
dently to mean that the verse was derived from M膩dhav膩-
c膩rya's commentary (II. i, pp. 220-221) on the Par膩艣ara-
smrti, where it has been quoted with the mention of the
V膩mana-p. as its source.
The derivation of Pur膩峁噄c verses
from M膩dhav膩c膩rya's works with the words 'm膩dhaviye
pur膩峁噀' is not peculiar to Bhairava alone. There are other
Nibandha-writers who have used the same words in the
cases of some of the Pur膩峁噄c verses derived from M膩dhav膩-
c膩rya's works. See, for instance, Nilakantha-bha峁�峁璦's Acara-
may奴kha, p. 107-
m膩dhaviye pur膩峁噀-
'yat phalam soma-y膩gena pr膩pnoti dhanav膩n dvija岣� /
samyak pa帽ca-mah膩yaj帽air daridras tad av膩pnuy膩t //'
It is to be noted that this verse (yat phalam soma-y膩gena
etc.) is found quoted by Madhav膩c膩rya in his commentary
on the Par膩艣ara-sm峁泃i (Ac膩ra-k膩峁囜笉a, Adhy膩ya I, p. 413)
with the words "pur膩峁噀 'pi."
14. The Mahesa Upapur膩峁嘺.
This work has been mentioned in two lists only, viz.,
those ascribed to the 'Brahma-vaivarta' in Mitra-mi艣ra's
Viramitrodaya and Gop膩lad膩sa's Bhakti-ratn膩kara.
Though derived from the same source, these two lists differ