Principle of Shakti in Kashmir Shaivism (Study)
by Nirmala V. | 2016 | 65,229 words
The thesis explores the evolution and role of Shakti—the feminine principle—within the religious and philosophical framework of Kashmir Shaivism. Tantrism represents an ancient Indian spiritual system that has been interpreted and misinterpreted over time, with Shakti traditionally holding a prominent role. This study examines four major sub-stream...
Preface
Tantrism, right from the time immemorial, gained extensive reach throughout the subcontinent with a wide range of esoteric practices, literary records and through a variety of sects. As a whole still it remains as a system which cannot be introduced by a precise definition, authentic chronology or history. Being most confusing and structurally complex, the sorting out of its sub-systems along with their branches also persists ambiguous. Among the numerous streams of Tantrism, the one which devoted to Ś (Ś) holds high significance. Ś never has been a monolithic system since it is flourished across the Indian subcontinent through various sub-streams. The unique sub-stream having the peculiar religious philosophical character, produced by Ś was the one which originated in Kashmir and generally called as Kashmir Ś.
Kashmir Ś is a developed philosophical doctrine which is encompassed with different concepts. Among these concepts, Śپ is the most important one. The present study entitled ‘Principle of Śپ in Kashmir Ś-Function and Evolution� attempts to analyze the shift occurred in the prominence of the principle of Śپ in the sub-streams of Kashmir Ś.
The present thesis is comprised of seven chapters inclusive of Introduction and Conclusion. The first portion of the present thesis, Introductory Remarks, evaluates these heterogeneous approaches ii persisting in the field of Ś and tries to configure such an outline of Tantric systems, especially of Kashmir Ś that would act as a proper prologue to the key discussion of the study. The Form and Functions of Śپ in Kashmir Ś-the second chapter-begins with the discussion of the wider aspect of the traditional Indian notion of power i.e. Śپ. Further the enquiry focuses on the history of formation of the very concept. It also suggests the untenability of the theory of semantic as well as conceptual origin of Śپ from Vedas to which similar etymological enquiries normally go back and get stopped. The deliberations on Śپ in this chapter lead to the assertion that the forms of Śپ in ʰٲⲹñ doctrine as the nature of supreme Ś are in a subordinate position.
The third chapter Evolution of Śپ in Kashmir Ś is devoted for an in-depth analysis of the process of Śپ’s evolution. The examination starts with the earliest tradition called Kula, where Śپ is characterized as a semi-divine entity (viz. ī) that has attained supernatural powers. The later conceptions of Kula are the divinized forms of Śپ which include Varṇadevatās (ī and ṛk) and Trikadevatās (ʲ, ʲparā and 貹). In the subsequent stream Krama, Śپ is represented as the divine form for death and fear. Further, Spanda originates as a new stream which by deteriorating the position of Śپ, conceives the male principle Ś as the supreme reality. Nevertheless Spanda shows an unconscious allegiance to Śپ; whereas ʰٲⲹñ, the fourth system upholds the state of Śپ in its multifarious doctrinal concepts in accordance with the metaphysics of iii the theory of recognition. The fourth chapter Causes of the Evolution explains how the process of de-Śāktisation was an appropriate and effective method for the same.
Impacts of the Evolution which is the fifth chapter tries to explore the after effects of the change in the position of Śپ, including in the new de-Śپsed concepts, notions and schools in the realm of Kashmir Ś. It finds that it was the exegetical techniques that made this process successful. The sixth chapter, Social and Philosophical Implications of Śپ in Kashmir Ś, explores how the Śپ oriented concepts highlighted the religious and philosophical prominence of the non-dual Ś in the later period. It suggests that the divergent roles of Śپ-including the linguistic, aesthetic, gnostic and categorical aspects-in the aforesaid domain could be viewed as the patterns of structural replication. The chapter finally concludes that in the interpretative contexts, this process of replication is an essential element called ‘disclosure of Śپ�.
The final chapter, Conclusion, highlights the significant points of discussion and the position on which the issues are to be examined. It also enumerates the main observations and findings formed through this study.
I wish to acknowledge my deep gratitude to Dr. P. V. Narayanan, my supervising teacher for his constant encouragement and support. I also owe special thanks to my parents whose support during the period of research has been wholehearted. My deep gratitude also goes to Prof. iv Navjivan Rastogi for his valuable suggestions in the topic. I must also mention the names of Prof. Kamalakar Mishra, Prof. D. B. Sensharma and Prof. David Peter Lawrence whose suggestions helped me very much to get some clarifications in the approaches. I also express my gratitude to Dr. P. K. Dharmarajan, Head of the Department of Sanskrit Sahitya, Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, Kalady for the assistance provided for my research. Thanks are due to the University authorities and the faculty members of Department of Sanskrit Sahitya, for the help rendered by them for the completion of my research work.