365bet娱乐

53
Like to disconnect the science of reasoning from metaphysics,
ethics, etc., because in their view the only object of
pramana is to explain the prameyas representing all other
espects. But the followers of the Buddha separated the
science of reasoning from the rest of the sciences and thos
confined it to its own limited scope as if it has nothing
to do with the prameyes.
The Buddhistic logicians like N膿g膩rjuna (2nd century
A.D.), Asanga and Vasubandhu (4th century A.D.) and Dignaga
(450 A.D.) criticized the Nyaya Sutras and Nyaya Bh膩峁�ya.
Dign膩ga in his work 'Pram膩峁嘺-smuccaya' laid the foundation
of his realist-idealistic epistemology, and threw a
challenge to the realism of the orthodox schools and thus
added fuel to fire. From this it is evident that there
was a good deal of cleavage between Astika and N盲stika
logicians. There was a mutual intellectual difference
between the two parties in which many scholars from both
the sides took active parts
(111) Uddyotakara
Uddyotakara wrote a sub-commentary named 'Nyaya.
V膩rtika' on the Ny膩ya Bh膩峁�ya of V膩tsy膩yana in order to
defend the stand point of Ny膩ya against the attacks and
wrong interpretations of the Buddhists like Dignaga and
others. This is evident from the opening lines of the