Matsya Purana (critical study)
by Kushal Kalita | 2018 | 74,766 words | ISBN-13: 9788171103058
This page relates ‘Imagery in the Matsyapurana� of the English study on the Matsya-purana: a Sanskrit text preserving ancient Indian traditions and legends written in over 14,000 metrical verses. In this study, the background and content of the Matsyapurana is outlined against the cultural history of ancient India in terms of religion, politics, geography and architectural aspects. It shows how the encyclopedic character causes the text to deal with almost all the aspects of human civilization.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
Part 4 - Imagery in the Ѳٲⲹܰṇa
Imagery means figurative illustration in any literature. It actually represents mental images collectively.[1]
In the words of M.H.Abrams,
“Imagery (that is, images taken collectively) is used to signify all the objects and qualities of sense perception referred to in a poem or other work of literature, whether by literal description, by allusion, or in the analogues used in its similes and metaphors.� [2]
Imagery includes auditory, tactile (touch), olfactory (smell), gustatory (taste), or kinesthetic (sensation of movement) as well as visual qualities. It is also said in Abrams� work that, most commonly, imagery is used to signify figurative language, especially the vehicles of metaphors and similes.[3] Imagery is the minute observation of the poet through which he can pour out the inner feelings of his heart in his writings. It enables a reader to connect the matter of description as aimed at by the poet about which the reader does not have even the abstract idea with any source available around. In short Imagery brings two similar objects in one platform.
In the Ѳٲⲹܰṇa, a good number of narratives have carried imagery and the purpose of the poet is executed in the concerned references by these imageries. In most of the cases the imagery has been used as the tool for similes and metaphors. Images of moon are found abundantly in the Ѳٲⲹܰṇa which represent a common imagery in Sanskrit literature. The beauty and the brightness of the moon are ever charming and that is why it is in common use for figurative illustration while describing the beauty of a lady. For example in the Ѳٲⲹܰṇa the poet has compared the face of Ilā with full moon.
Her enchanting beauty is thus conveyed to the reader through the image of beauty of the full moon
There are other instances where the image of beautiful moon is well utilised for depicting a beautiful woman.
Along with the beauty of the moon, the brilliance of the sun is also used for figurative illustration and in the Ѳٲⲹܰṇa this imagery is aptly employed while describing the powerful and shining character of ī due to her severe austerities:
ᾱ첹ᱹԲᱹ ٲ貹ٱdzī ܳ.[5]
Another example
tu tān vidhivatpūjyān pūjayitvā Բٲ�/
uvācādityasaṃkāśān munīn sapta ī śԲ�// [6]
Again the blazing fire is also taken for imagery in the Ѳٲⲹܰṇa in different contexts. For instance
dvau mā� śokāvagnikalpau dahetā� kacasya nāśastava caivopaghāta�/
kacasya nāśe mama پ ś tavopaghāte jīvitu� ś// [7]
In this verse the pain of heart is portrayed through the image of burning fire. The double pain felt by ٱ𱹲ī has burnt her heart just like burning fire hurts one after getting connected with it. One may not feel ٱ𱹲ī’s pain but through the imagination of the poet the reader may get the sensation through the imagery. Such image of burning fire is very catching in literary world too. The same image of fire is always a subject for comparison with anger specially in case of Lord Ś’s wrath because when he gets angry nobody can escape but turns into ashes, just like the burning fire.
The third Eye of Ś became ablaze and ready to consume the whole world from the fire of wrath produced from it when 峾𱹲 triggered the love-arrow at meditating Lord Ś.
For example
ٲٲ� DZԲǻūٲǰṅkīṣaṇe//
babhūva vadane Աٰ� ṛtīⲹԲܱ/
rudrasya raudravapuṣo jagatsaṃhārabhairavam// [8]
Freshness and novelty are the two major factors in the success of image. Through novelty freshness acts as the power that can reveal those things which a reader cannot even realise before.
In the Ѳٲⲹܰṇa also the poet has drawn such images. An instance of this idea is:
The chamberlain started with a short but fully significant speech and then said to the king ܰ, who was sitting brilliant as if hundreds of suns were blazing. Here the poet’s imagination helps the reader get a perfect picture of king ܰ in his brilliancy with prowess and capability everywhere just like many blazing suns.
The mighty King ۲پ and his braveness is remarkable and the poet of the Ѳٲⲹܰṇa has correctly chosen the image of lion, the king of the beasts for showcasing the valour of the very king in sa ṃhԳٴ ܱ ṣaⲹdz�.[10]
In this way it is seen that the author of the Ѳٲⲹܰṇa has successfully used similes and metaphors in drawing the correct image as the case may be. But it must be mentioned here that the Ѳٲⲹܰṇa not being a poetical work and being mostly of descriptive and deductive nature, doesn’t contain a very high class of imagery as found in other literary works of Sanskrit.
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
Oxford Dictionary, p.370
[2]:
M.H.Abrams, A Glossary of Literary Terms, p.176
[3]:
Ibid., p.77
[4]:
Ѳٲⲹܰṇa, 11.49
[5]:
Ibid., 154.422
[6]:
Ibid., 154.319
[7]:
Ibid., 25.53
[8]:
Ibid., 154.249-250
[9]:
Ibid., 154.2
[10]:
Ibid., 34.7