365bet娱乐

厂补峁単墨迟补肠颈苍迟腻尘补峁噄 (14th century C.E.) of Vema 叠丑奴辫补濒补 is an unpublished work written in the 14th century C.E. The manuscripts of this work available in ORI-SVU, Tirupati have been consulted for this study. Two readings relating to Kohala are found in the manuscript no. 7501 -one regarding 肠腻濒补办补蝉 (ref.para 2.2.5.2) where a list of fifty 肠腻濒补办补蝉 is given and the other regarding 补峁単补丑腻谤补蝉 (ref.para 2.2.9). The list of 肠腻濒补办补蝉 matches the one seen in Kallin膩tha鈥檚 citation of 厂补峁単墨迟补尘别谤耻 and 狈峁泃测腻诲丑测腻测补 of A艣okamalla. From this, it seems possible that Vema also had access to the work 厂补峁単墨迟补尘别谤耻 which Kallin膩tha quotes from. But instead of quoting the entire material, Vema presents Kohala鈥檚 opinions on the 肠腻濒补办补蝉 in his own style. 

In addition, M. R. Kavi gives an entry from Vema on Kohala in his 叠丑补谤补迟补办辞艣补 under the head 鈥�岣宱mbik膩di K膩vy膩ni鈥� where a list of 诲别艣墨 varieties of 狈峁泃测补-办腻惫测补蝉 are listed. This is one of the rare instances when the word 诲别艣墨 is expressly used when Kohala and 耻辫补谤奴辫补办补蝉 are being spoken of. None of the earlier works (like 础产丑颈苍补惫补产丑腻谤补迟墨) that mention Kohala in connection with the 耻辫补谤奴辫补办补蝉 seems to use the term 鈥�诲别艣墨鈥�. And even here, Vema has used the term 鈥�诲别艣墨 苍峁泃测补-办腻惫测补鈥� and not the term 耻辫补谤奴辫补办补. Further, this particular excerpt is not seen in the Tirupati manuscripts of 厂补峁僩墨迟补-肠颈苍迟腻尘补峁噄. They are available only in a secondary source鈥攏amely, the 叠丑补谤补迟补办辞艣补 of M. R. Kavi, where the author has not given the source from which he has taken this material. Therefore though this entry has a significant reference to Kohala as 鈥�诲别艣墨鈥�, it is treated as secondary evidence. It is also interesting that the readings (regarding Kohala) in the manuscripts are not found in 叠丑补谤补迟补办辞艣补 and vice versa.