365bet娱乐

2
. The AD is handling Angikabhinaya in a fashion which differs from the NS. But the SR fully depends on the NS in this case. If the AD had a modern text it also would have followed the NS. From this it could be concluded that the AD is an ancient work which follows an ancient tradition. But later, some evidences have been found which refute Dr.Ghosh's conclusions. By comparing the AD and the SR Dr. Ku帽junni Raja concludes that the AD is a modern work. His points of arguments are as follows. 1. Bharata in the NS considers Nandike艣vara as an authentic writer or 2. teacher himself. But it is well-known that the AD depends on the NS in its contents. In the AD the author says- 啶忇い啶距え啶� 啶�啷傕ぐ啷嵿さ啶多ぞ啶膏�嵿い啷嵿ぐ啶距え啷佮ぐ啷嬥ぇ啶苦え啷� 啶掂�� 啶�啶�啶� 啷� [et膩ni p奴rva艣膩str膩nurodhin墨 vai may膩 | ] This statement itself points out the indebtedness of the AD to its earlier works. 3. The interpreters like Simhabh奴p膩la and Kallin膩tha attribute the authorship of the above stanza to 艢盲rngadeva which is seen both in the AD and the SR Simhabh奴p膩la interprets the manga岣穉艣l艒ka 戮戮 啶�啷佮さ啶ㄠ�� 啶掂た啶多�嵿さ啶� [bhuvana峁� vi艣va峁� ] like this 啶椸��啶むさ啶距う啷嵿く啷� 啶夃�曕�嵿い啷� 啶呧さ啶多た啶粪�嵿�熰�� 啶ㄠ�冟い啷嵿い啶� 啶掂た啶掂�曕�嵿し啷佮じ啷嵿い啶む�� 啶膏�傕�氞�曕�� 啶�啶權�嵿�椸げ啶�啶距�氞ぐ啶む�� 啶嗋�權�嵿�椸た啶曕ぎ啶苦い啶� | [g墨tav膩dye ukte ava艣i峁ａ弓a峁� n峁泃ta峁� vivak峁�ustat s奴caka峁� ma峁単alam膩carati 膩峁単ikamiti | ] Kallin膩tha interprets the same sloka like this. 啶呧ぅ 啶椸��啶むさ啶距う啷嵿く啷嬥お啶曕ぞ啶班�嵿く啶む�嵿さ啷囙え啶距き啷囙う啶距い啶苦ざ啶�啷嬥お啶距く啶�啷傕い啶� 啶ㄠぐ啷嵿い啶ㄠ�� 啶�啷嵿ぐ啶むた啶�啶距う啶�啶苦し啷嵿�犩�� 啶膏ぎ啷佮�氞た啶む�囙し啷嵿�熰う啷囙さ啶むぞ啶� 啶ㄠぐ啷嵿い啶ㄠお啷冟し啷嵿�犩�椸�佮ぃ啶む�嵿さ啷囙え 啶膏�嵿い啷屶い啶� 啶嗋�權�嵿�椸た啶曕ぎ啶苦い啷嵿く啶距う啶� 啷� [atha g墨tav膩dyopak膩ryatven膩bhed膩ti艣ayop膩yabh奴ta峁� nartana峁� pratip膩dayi峁ａ弓ha岣� samucite峁ａ弓adevat膩峁� nartanap峁涐梗峁環agu峁嘺tvena stauti 膩峁単ikamity膩di | ] From the words of these two 91