Expiatory Rites in Keralite Tantra
by T. S. Syamkumar | 2017 | 59,416 words
This page relates ‘Expiatory Rites in Samhita Literature� of the study on Expiatory Rites in Sanskrit literature and ancient Indian religion and society, with special reference to Keralite Tantra. Further references to texts include those found in Shaivism, Vaishnavism and Shaktism as well as Dharmashastra literature. This study also investigates temple records and inscriptions of Kerala in order to demonstrate the connection between social life and expiatory rites and its evolution.
Go directly to: Footnotes.
5.1. Expiatory Rites in Saṃhitā Literature
The Vedas are the earliest literary source mentioning various forms of expiation. The Vedic seers considered that one has to perform expiation for the deliverance from sins and their bad effects. The roots of the concepts and features of sin and expiation seen in later Sanskrit literature can be traced out in Vedas. Generally the Vedic ʰⲹśٳٲ consisted of the performance of a variety of sacrifices, purificatory baths and recitation of the Vedic Mantras. The whole of Sanskrit literature reveals the existence of a social system based on different dimensions of this concept.
In the Vedic period,[1] it is believed that one can be free from sins only through the expiation. The Vedic people offered prayers, Havis and Soma to Agni, ղṇa, ṇa貹پ and Aśviṃs for that purpose.[2] In ṻ岹, ղṇa has an elevated status as the divine entity active in rescuing human beings from sins and in maintaining a righteous legal system.[3] The concepts of purity and sin referred to in ṻ岹 attain more authority when they reach Atharvaveda.[4] The seers of ṻ岹 offered sacrifices to the gods for the removals of sins. ṻ岹 consists of a prayer to waters (Āpa�) to wash away all evil (Durita) arising from daring violence (Abhidudroha) or from speaking falsehood (ṛt).[5] The Ṛgvedic people mostly used the expiations for removing their individual sins. While interpreting the word Saptamaryāda in a Ṛgvedic ūٲ, 첹 says that sins are seven in number. They are theft, violating the bed of the Guru, murder of ṇa, murder of Bhrūṇa, drinking of Sura (liquor), continual performance of the same sinful act and telling a lie.[6] After the period of ṻ岹 the expiatory rites were used in ritualistic actions like 岵 and ۲ñ. The Yajurveda, Atharvaveda and 峾岹 also use the word ʰⲹśٳٲ or Prāyaścitti in the sense of expiatory rites.[7] ղٳٲīⲹṃh states that the gods redeemed themselves from all sins by ś sacrifice. ᲹԱīṃh said that Ծṣṭdz destroys all sins.[8]
Footnotes and references:
[1]:
ṻ岹 is the oldest available literature in Sanskrit composed in the northwestern region of the Indian sub-continent, most likely in the period between 1500-1200 BCE. In addition, the initial codification of this text was complete in the period between 1200-900 BCE. Also the scholars determines the Vedic period is in between 1500-600 BCE. For a detail discussion on the topic vide Gavin, Flood, An Introduction to Hinduism, Cambridge University Press, 1936, p. 37, Michel Witzel, “Early Sanskritization Origins and Development of the Kuru ٲٱ�, Electronic Journal of Vedic Studies (EVJS), 1995, pp. 1-26. According to Patrick Olivelle and McClish, the date of the early Vedic period is in between 1500-1000 BCE. Cf. The ٳśٰ Selections from the Classic Indian Work on Statecraft, edited and translated with an introduction by Mark McClish and Patrick Olivelle, Hackett Publishing Company, Inc, Indianapolis/Cambridge, 2012, p. xxiv.
[2]:
See ṻ岹, 1.18.1-5, 1.24.9, 1.24.13-15, 1.25.1-5, 1.36, 1.36.11-14 and 1.58.8-9.
[3]:
Ravindran, K.A.,“ղṇa in ṻ岹-The God of Virtue and Law�, ʰٲⲹñ, Half yearly Journal of the Department of Sahitya, Sree Sankaracharya University of Sanskrit, Kalady, Vol. II, Issue I, ed. Dharma Raj Adat, pp. 128-132. Also, see Ṛt: The cosmic order, ed. Madhu Khanna, D. K. Print world (P) Ltd, New Delhi, 2004.
[4]:
Atharvaveda, 6.45, 6.26, 6.114, 6.115, 6.112, 6.113, 6.120, 6.27, 6.29, 7.24, 6.46 and 7.115.
[5]:
ṻ岹, 1.23.22, 10.9.8.
[6]:
[7]:
Yajurveda, 39.12; Atharvaveda, 14.1.30; ղٳٲīⲹṃh, 3.1.3.2, 4.1.4.7, 5.1.9.3 and 5.1.12.9; Ѳٰⲹṇīyṃh, 1.4.8, 1.8.3, 1.8.7 and 2.1.4; ṻ첹ṃh, 6.3, 6.6, 6.11, 32.4, 35.16, 35.17, 35.18 and 35.19; 辱ṣṭṃh, 4.2, 4.5 and 4.36.
[8]:
Vsam, 8.13.