365bet娱乐

50
as would appear from '啶膏�炧�嵿�溹く啶距�� 啶︵ぞ啶膏�嵿く啶距ぎ啷�啶むた 啶多�佮げ啷嵿�曕�� 啶�啷嵿ぐ啶むた啶椸�冟す啷嵿く [sa帽jay膩ya d膩sy膩m墨ti 艣ulka峁� pratig峁沨ya] ' (p. 8,
Vi峁嚹乿膩savadatta, M. O.S.). We have carefully gone
through the portion of the drama published so far, and
find that it has much in common with the Pratijn膩 of
Bh膩sa. There are, however, important divergences in the
plot from the Udayana plays of Bhasa and the known
Udayana legends. Thus, this play speaks of the
engagement of Vasavadatta with Sanjaya, dream
of Mahasena, his plan to capture Udayana
specially with the intention of making the
the
latter
his son-in-law, Yaugandhar膩ya峁嘺 also having an unlucky
dream and spreading the news of the death of Udayana
in the fight, Yaugandharayana's staging a fake funeral of
himself in the presence of the public who were under the
illusion of his magic (vidy膩), war between Pradyota and
Vatsaraja's supporters, etc. There are to be seen many
Bh膩sa echoes in the work, showing that the author was
quite familiar with Bhasa's works. He also seems to be well-
versed in classical dramas. Vi峁嚹乿膩savadatta is only the
name by which the work was known to the owner of the
MS. "There is nothing in the body of the MS", as has
been observed by Prof. K. Sastri, "to warrant this title"."
Much importance, therefore, need not be attached to it.
We are inclined to think that this Vi峁嚹乿膩sava岣峚tta is the
same as the Unm盲dav膩savadatta written by Saktibhadra,
and that, therefore, there is no necessity to look up to
any one of the Trivandrum plays for identification with
the Unmada and subsequently, ascription of the whole lot
to Saktibhadra.
Prof. Dhruva brings forth the testimony of Sakti-
bhadra himself, which is against the conjecture of assigning
the Bhasa plays to him. The prologue to the A艣carya
states in unmistakable terms that there was no Sanskrit
drama in Kerala before Saktibhadra's time, i. e., tenth
century. But we have references to Bh膩sa long before
that time, at any rate, since the seventh century (a).
Hence, Saktibhadra cannot be the author of the plays
that were known centuries before his time.
1 Vi峁嚹乿膩savadatta, Mad. Or. Series, p. 1. 2 Pratima, Intr., pp. 21-22 of.
啶膏�傕い啷嵿ぐ啶оぞ啶班�� - 啶嗋く啷囙�� 啶︵�曕�嵿し啶苦ぃ啶�啶ムぞ啶︵ぞ啶椸い啶�啶距ざ啷嵿�氞ぐ啷嵿く啶氞�傕ぁ啶距ぎ啶｀た 啶ㄠぞ啶� 啶ㄠぞ啶熰�曕ぎ啶�啶苦え啶�啶距ぎ啷嵿ぐ啷囙ぁ啶苦い啶膏�屶き啶距�椸�嵿く啶�啶�啶苦げ啶粪ぞ啶�
啶囙い啷嵿く啶距ぐ啷嵿く啶�啶苦ざ啷嵿ぐ啶距ぃ啶距�� 啶多ぞ啶膏え啶�啷� 啷�
啶ㄠ�熰�� -啶呧�溹�嵿��, 啶呧�氞�嵿�氞ぞ啶灌た啶︵�� 啶栢�� 啶忇う啶� 啷� 啶嗋き啶距じ 啶�啶膏�� [s奴tradh膩ra岣� - 膩ye峁� dak峁�i峁嘺path膩d膩gatam膩艣caryac奴岣嵞乵a峁噄 n膩ma n膩峁璦kamabhinay膩mre岣峣tasaubh膩gyamabhila峁Ｄ乵a
ity膩ryami艣r膩峁嚹佱箖 艣膩sanam |
na峁��� -ajja, acc膩hida峁� khu eda峁� | 膩bh膩sa pasava] s 啶�啷佮し啷嵿�曕�� 啶膏た啶椸う啶距�� 啶� 啶む�囙げ啷嵿げ啶� 啶夃お啷嵿お啶距う啶�啶ㄠ�嵿い啶�
啶溹ぐ 啶︵�曕�嵿�栢た啶｀ぞ啶� 啶︵た啶膏ぞ啶� 啶椸ぞ啶∴き啶｀た啶�啶ㄠ�嵿ぇ啶｀�� 啷�
[pu峁�ka峁� sigad膩o a tella峁� upp膩dayanti
jara dakkhi峁嚹乷 dis膩o g膩岣峚bha峁噄bandha峁嘺峁� |
]