365bet娱乐

108
fan, took the word as an epithet of 'Fire'-
'啶斷い啷嵿じ啶班�嵿�椸た啶� 啶︵ぞ啶灌�曕じ啷嵿さ啶�啶距さ啶掂ぞ啶ㄠ�� [autsargika d膩hakasvabh膩vav膩n] ' 鈥� and by the insertion of 啶むく啷嬥ぐ啷嵿ぎ啶о�嵿く啶距い啷� [迟补测辞谤尘补诲丑测腻迟 ] in the
third line, rendered the verse as meaning "Fire left
unburnt the poems of Bh膩sa like mercury"; while the
reading, as it stood, meant, according to Dr. Sastri, "Fire
did not burn those portions of both Bh膩sa and Vy膩sa
which described Visnudharma". He, however, concludes
that the exact meaning is to be got at by having other
manuscripts of the original and the commentary.
We think that the word fan in the quotation does.
not refer to any works of Bh膩sa, but the whole verse is
meant to state the tradition of Bh膩sa's works having
survived the fire ordeal. Mr. Sankar successfully tries to
extract the required confirmation of the tradition from the
verse by emending 啶掂た啶粪�嵿ぃ啷佮ぇ啶班�嵿ぎ啶距え啷� [惫颈峁ａ箛耻诲丑补谤尘腻苍 ] to 啶掂た啶粪�嵿ぃ啷佮ぇ啶班�嵿ぎ啶ㄠ��, [惫颈峁ａ箛耻诲丑补谤尘补苍, ] and 啶�啶距ぐ啶むさ啶む�� [辫腻谤补迟补惫补迟 ] to 啶�啶距ぐ啶むさ啶む��.
[产丑腻谤补迟补惫补迟.
] He takes the verse to mean that the Svapnav膩savadatta
in Bh膩sa's works equals Bh膩rata in merits. There is thus
no necessity to suppose the transference of the tradition of
the Svapna as done by Dr. Bhandarkar," because the
verse confirms the tradition and is not at variance with it.
That really seems to be the sense. Hence the attempts
to identify the Visnudharma with some published or
unpublished works seem to us rather futile and baseless."
Mr. R. Kavi of Rajahmundry in a paper read at
the Third Oriental Conference held at Madras, attributed
the D膩maka Prahasanam and Traivikrama to Bh膩sa.5
Dr. Jolly in a learned article in Festgabe Garbe has
disproved the alleged connection in the case of D膩maka
Prahasana, and Prof. K. Rama Pisharoti, one of the
leaders of the opposition, places the Traivikrama in the
12th century A.D., and ascribes it to some C膩ky膩r,
possibly Nilakantha.
6.
some
D膩maka Prahasana would serve as the best
illustration of what may be called a 'compilation'. Traces
of borrowing from different sources are evident in many
parts of the work. Thus, the first scene has been patched
1 Critical Study, pp. 48-49; App. II b. 2 AMV, 2, pp. 42-43. 3 IA,
42, p. 53 note. 4 Bhandarkar (op. cit) refers to two works of the name of
Visnudharma or Visnudharmottara, both Puranas. Hirananda Sastri (MASI, 28,
p. 27) identifies the Visnudharma of Bh膩sa with Visnudharmottariya published at
Bombay. One Visnudharmottara, containing one of the oldest and most exhaustive
Kramrisch, Calcutta,
1928. 5 OC, III, pp. 80-85, 6 Jolly, Festgabe Garbe, pp. 115-121; Pisharoti,
Shama'a, 1924, pp. 213-222 at p. 214; Damala, edited by V. Sarma, Lahore, 1926.
treatises on Indian painting has been published by Dr. Stella