365betÓéĄÖ

Bhagavatpadabhyudaya by Lakshmana Suri (study)

by Lathika M. P. | 2018 | 67,386 words

This page relates ā€˜Theory of Causationā€� of the study on the Bhagavatpadabhyudaya by Lakshmana Suri: a renowned Sanskrit Scholar from the 19th century. The Bhagavatpada-abhyudaya is a Mahakavya (epic poem) narrating the life of Shankara-Acharya, a prominent teacher of Advaita Vedanta philosophy. This essay investigates the socio-spiritual conditions of 8th century AD in ancient India as reflected in Lakshmanasuri’s work.

Go directly to: Footnotes.

The theory of causation as is known in Indian philosophy is based on two views: that the effect is pre existent in the cause prior to its creation, and that the effect doe snot pre-exist in the cause. Consequently, there have been two main theory of causation ³§²¹³Ł°ģÄå°ł²ā²¹±¹Äå»å²¹[1] (the doctrine of pre-existance of the effect in the cause) and Asatkāryā±¹Äå»å²¹ (the doctrine of non existence of the effect in the cause). The ³¦Äå°ł±¹Äå°ģ²¹ system, Hinayāna Buddhism, ±·²āÄå²ā²¹ and ³Õ²¹¾±Å›±šį¹£i°ģ²¹ systems advocate Asatkārya ±¹Äå»å²¹. For the Asatkārya vādiṃs, effect is a fresh creation, a new thing. °­Äå°ł²ā²¹ or effect is asat or unreal before its coming into being. Satkāryavādiṃs claim that °­Äå°ł²ā²¹ is sat or real even before its manifestation, since it exist in the cause in a potential form and is the actualization of what ever is potential in the cause. Satkaryavada again comprises two different schools of thought. One school maintains that the effect is the apparent transformation of the cause, and the other belives that the effect is the real transformation of the cause. The Advaita philosophy accepts the former view, which is known as ā€˜Brahmavivarta ±¹Äå»å²¹ā€�. Brahman being the only true cause, the world is a distorted appearance of it.

A five-fold argument supports the Vedanda theory of causation

1. The non–existent can never be made an existent object.

2. The product is not different from the material out of which it is produced, e.g: the pot is not different from its material which is clay, the statue is not different from the marble out of which it is made.

3. The product exists in the shape of the material before it comes in to being, e.g: the cloth exists in the form of thread, the pot in the form of clay.

4. The efficiency of the cause lies in its necessary potency, which is to say, that which does not have the potentiality to produce can never be regarded as an efficient cause.

5. The effect and the cause are the same nature.

µž³ó²¹²µ²¹±¹²¹³Ł±čÄå»åÄå²ś³ó²ā³Ü»å²¹²ā²¹³¾ does not go deep into such philosophical intricacies.

Footnotes and references:

[back to top]

[1]:

asadakaraṇādupādānagrahaṇāt sarvasambhavā'bhāvāt |
śaktasya śakyakaraṇāt kāraṇabhāvāśca satkāryam ||

  Iswara Krishna ³§²¹į¹ƒk³ó²ā²¹°ģÄå°ł¾±°ģ²¹, Ed., M.M Guruprasad Sastri Varanasi: Surabharati Prakasan, 2009, p.9

Let's grow together!

I humbly request your help to keep doing what I do best: provide the world with unbiased sources, definitions and images. Your donation direclty influences the quality and quantity of knowledge, wisdom and spiritual insight the world is exposed to.

Let's make the world a better place together!

Like what you read? Help to become even better: