365bet娱乐

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation of verse 3.14.549-550:

啶掂�嵿く啶�啶苦�氞ぞ啶班�� 啶むぅ啶距じ啶苦う啷嵿ぇ啷� 啶膏お啷嵿い啶�啷�啶椸�嵿ぐ啶灌ぃ啶距う啷� 啶掂た啶ㄠぞ 啷�
啶膏お啷嵿い啶�啷嵿く啷囙さ啷嬥�氞�嵿く啶む�� 啶膏ぐ啷嵿さ啶� 啶� 啶膏え啷嵿い啷嵿く啶ㄠ�嵿く啶� 啶掂た啶�啶曕�嵿い啶�啶� 啷� 啷�啷�啷� 啷�
啶呧い啷嵿く啶ㄠ�嵿い啶膏�嵿く 啶掂た啶粪く啷� 啶膏お啷嵿い啶�啷嵿く啶� 啶溹�嵿�炧ぞ啶�啶ㄠぞ啶班�嵿ぅ啶�啶� 啷�
啶�啶距ぇ啶苦い啶� 啶掂た啶ㄠた啶掂ぐ啷嵿い啷囙い 啶粪し啷嵿�犩�� 啶膏ぞ 啶椸�冟す啷嵿く啶む�� 啶�啷佮え啶� 啷� 啷�啷�啷� 啷�

atyantasya vi峁�aye saptamy膩 j帽膩pan膩rthay膩 |
b膩dhit膩 vinivarteta 峁�a峁ａ弓h墨 s膩 g峁沨yate puna岣� || 550 ||
vyabhic膩re tath膩siddhe 蝉补辫迟补尘墨graha峁嚹乨 vin膩 |
saptamyevocyate sarv膩 na santyany膩 vibhaktaya岣� || 549 ||

549. If the third case-affix is continued, deviation would be certain without the mention of the seventh case-affix. But as the seventh case-affix is mentioned, it shows that the other case-endings are not covered.

550. The sixth case-affix would be set aside in this matter by the seventh which is meant to be a clue. So it is mentioned, so that it may be brought in again.

Commentary

[Why has the sixth case-affix (tasya) been also mentioned in P. 5.1.116? The seventh case-affix (tatra) by itself would have been enough because the fact of being the subject-matter (惫颈峁�a测补) which is the meaning of the seventh would cover also the meaning of the sixth, so that the latter need not be separately mentioned. To remove this objection, the purpose of mentioning the sixth is now explained. Normally, the seventh case-affix is not used in association with iva. The very fact that it is so taught here shows that normally it does not occur in that sense. Il the sixth is not taught because it is covered by the seventh, then where the seventh is not possible, the sixth also would not be possible. But it is desired that the sixth should always be possible in association with iva and for that it is necessary to mention it separately in the 蝉奴迟谤补. It might be argued that if the sixth is not mentioned separately but only the seventh is mentioned, the latter would be alright only as expressive of the abode (补诲丑颈办补谤补峁嘺) on the basis of connection with an outside word and not as expressive of 艣别峁�a. If the sixth case-affix were also there, one could decide that the seventh is expressive of 艣别峁�a because of its association with the sixth. If the sixth is not mentioned at all, the mention of the seventh would not be a clue that it can also be used as expressive of 艣别峁�a in association with iva. So there is no question of the seventh setting aside the sixth altogether if the latter is not mentioned. Though there is some truth in this argument, the real position is as follows:鈥擳he very fact that both the case-affixes are mentioned when one of them would have been enough to cover the other also shows that one of them is only meant to be a clue. It is the seventh which is meant to be a clue because the sixth cannot be used in the sense of the seventh. The suffix vati is desired to be added to a word ending in the sixth also. So, in its own sphere, the sixth cannot be set aside. It might be objected that if the mention of the seventh here is a clue, that the seventh here is in the sense of 艣别峁�a, then the suffix vati cannot be added to a word ending in the seventh expressive of abode, as for instance in madhur膩y膩m 峁僡 p膩峁璦liputre pr膩s膩d膩岣�. If vati is added to a word ending in the seventh expressive of 艣别峁�a, then the word expressive of the upameya cannot end in the seventh. We would have to say p膩峁璦liputrasya pr膩s膩d膩岣�. Therefore, we have to take the word tatra twice in P. 5.1.116. One of them would teach vati after a word ending in the seventh expressive of the abode and the other would indicate that the seventh can be used in the sense of 艣别峁�a This is what the 叠丑腻峁�y补办腻谤补 means. Others argue that the relation of abider and abode (腻诲丑腻谤腻诲丑别测补产丑腻惫补) can be covered by the sixth. So even if the upameya is put in the seventh case-affix, the suffix vati can be understood to have been added to a word ending in the sixth. This 蝉奴迟谤补 does not prevent vati from being added to a word ending in the 补诲丑颈办补谤补峁嘺-蝉补辫迟补尘墨. All that it does is to say that the seventh can be used in association with iva in the sense of 艣别峁�a.]

Now something is going to be said about P. 5.1.117.