365bet娱乐

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation of verse 3.14.160-161:

啶曕ぞ啶侧�嵿く啶距�� 啶曕ぞ啶侧ぞ啶︵�� 啶︵�嵿さ啶苦い啷�啶�啶距え啷嵿い啶距い啷� 啶曕ぞ啶侧�� 啶曕ぞ啶侧�嵿く啶距じ啷嵿い啶班が啷� 啶�啶掂�囙い啷� 啷�
啶ㄠ�嵿く啶曕�嵿�曕ぐ啷嵿い啶班�� 啶むぅ啶� 啶椸ぞ啶班�嵿�椸�嵿く啷� 啶椸ぐ啷嵿�椸�囙き啷嵿く啶� 啶�啷嵿ぐ啶む�嵿く啶�啷� 啶�啶掂�囙い啷� 啷� 啷оガ啷� 啷�
啶ㄠ�嵿く啶曕�嵿�曕ぐ啷嵿い啷冟し啷� 啶� 啶椸ぐ啷嵿�椸�囙し啷� 啶椸ぞ啶班�嵿�椸�嵿く啶距い啷� 啶膏�嵿く啶距い啷� 啶む�氞�嵿�� 啶ㄠ�囙し啷嵿く啶む�� 啷�
啶曕�佮ぎ啶距ぐ啷嵿く啶距�� 啶膏�嵿さ啶距ぐ啷嵿ぅ啶苦�曕�� 啶權��啶�啷� 啶膏�嵿く啶距い啷� 啶�啷嵿ぐ啶曕�冟い啷嵿く啶班�嵿ぅ啷� 啶灌た 啶ㄠぞ啶оた啶曕�� 啷� 啷оガ啷� 啷�

k膩ly膩峁� k膩l膩d dvit墨y膩nt膩t k膩le k膩ly膩starab bhavet |
nyakkartari tath膩 g膩rgye gargebhya岣� pratyayo bhavet || 160 ||
nyakkart峁涐梗u ca garge峁�u g膩rgy膩t sy膩t tacca ne峁�yate |
kum膩ry膩岣� sv膩rthike 峁吥玴 sy膩t prak峁泃yartho hi n膩dhika岣� || 161 ||

160. When the superior is 办腻濒墨, the suffix tarap would be added to the word 办腻濒补 having the second case-ending; when the superior is 办腻濒补, the suffix tarap would be added to the word 办腻濒墨 having the second case-ending, when the one who surpasses is 驳腻谤驳测补, the suffix would be added to 驳补谤驳腻岣�.

161. When those who surpass are the 驳补谤驳腻岣�, the suffix would be added to 驳腻谤驳测补岣� and all this is not desired. If tarap is added in the meaning of the stem itself (蝉惫腻谤摆?闭丑补) there would be 峁吥玴 (in 办耻尘腻谤颈迟补谤腻) because the meaning of the stem would not be over and above (that of degree).

Commentary

[When the suffix tarap is added in the sense of 办腻濒补m 补迟颈艣别迟别 办腻濒墨, we would get 办腻濒补tar膩 whereas it should be 办腻濒颈迟补谤腻. When it is added in the sense of 办腻濒墨m 补迟颈艣别迟别 办腻濒补岣�, we would get 办腻濒颈迟补谤补岣� whereas it should be 办腻濒补tara岣� In these illustrations we see difference in gender between the stem and the suffix when 补迟颈艣腻测补苍别 is interpreted as qualifying the meaning of the suffix (辫谤补迟测补测腻谤迟丑补 惫颈艣别峁�a峁嘺辫补办峁�a). Difference of number also would result. From 驳补谤驳腻n 补迟颈艣别迟别 驳腻谤驳测补岣�, we would get gargatara whereas it should be 驳腻谤驳测补tara. 驳腻谤驳测补m 补迟颈艣别谤补迟别 驳补谤驳腻岣� would yield 驳腻谤驳测补tara岣� whereas it should be 驳补谤驳补迟补谤腻岣�. All this is the result of the view that the meaning of the stem qualifies that of the suffix. Hence the M. Bh膩. has adopted the view that it is the meaning of the stem which is qualified, not by the meaning of the suffix, but within itself. In other words the suffix is added in the meaning of the stem itself (蝉惫腻谤迟丑别) which is that of the agent. So we would get 办腻濒颈迟补谤腻 from 办腻濒墨 补迟颈艣别迟别 and 办腻濒补tara岣� from 办腻濒补h 补迟颈艣别迟别. In this way, there would be no discrepancy of gender between the stem and the word formed. (See M. Bh膩. Up. 414, 1.20). Similarly, if we form gargyatara from 驳腻谤驳测补岣ゲ钩倬迸洷鸪俦�[?], and 驳补谤驳补迟补谤腻岣� from 驳补谤驳腻 补迟颈艣别谤补迟别, there would not be any discrepancy in number either.

But there would be one difficulty here. 碍耻尘腻谤墨 补迟颈艣别迟别 might yield kum膩ritar墨 (峁吥玴) whereas it should be 办耻尘腻谤颈迟补谤腻. If tarap is added in the sense of the stem itself (蝉惫腻谤迟丑补), the meaning of the stem 办耻尘腻谤墨 being the feminine conditioned by childhood (vayasi prathame), which is not apart from degree, the 峁吥玴 would be added again to express degree. It might be said that the tarap expresses degree in what is conveyed by the stem, namely, the feminine conditioned by childhood and, therefore, there is no need to add 峁吥玴 again to express degree. But in that way 峁�膩p also would become unnecessary. It might be said that 峁�膩p would come in the sense of the stem itself (蝉惫腻谤迟丑补) which is the feminine conditioned by childhood and having degree. But 峁吥玴 has been taught setting aside 峁�膩p and so that would come which is not desired.]

Thus a difficulty has been pointed out in the view that the suffix tarap is added in the sense of the stem itself. How the 叠丑腻峁�y补 meets this difficulty is now explained.