365bet娱乐

Sanskrit text, Unicode transliteration and English translation by Ganganath Jha:

啶�啶班う啶距ぐ啷囙し啷� 啶溹ぞ啶�啷囙い啷� 啶︵�嵿さ啷� 啶膏�佮い啷� 啶曕�佮ぃ啷嵿ぁ啶椸�嬥げ啶曕�� 啷�
啶�啶む�嵿く啷� 啶溹��啶掂い啶� 啶曕�佮ぃ啷嵿ぁ啶� 啶膏�嵿く啶距え啷� 啶�啷冟い啷� 啶�啶班�嵿い啶班た 啶椸�嬥げ啶曕�� 啷� 啷оキ啷� 啷�

parad膩re峁�u j膩yete dvau sutau ku峁囜笉agolakau |
patyau j墨vati ku峁囜笉a岣� sy膩n m峁泃e bhartari golaka岣� || 174 ||

By the wives of other men two kinds of sons are born: the 鈥湴�耻峁囜笉补鈥� and the 鈥淕olaka;鈥� he who is born while the husband is alive is the 鈥湴�耻峁囜笉��,鈥� and one born after the death of the husband is the 鈥淕olaka.鈥濃��(174)

 

Medh膩tithi鈥檚 commentary (尘补苍耻产丑腻峁�y补):

While the husband is alive, if a son is born to his wife living in his house, from a paramour tolerated by the forgiving nature of the husband,鈥攖his son born of a stranger is called 鈥�碍耻峁囜笉补.鈥�

That born after the husband has died, is 鈥�Golaka.鈥�

Some people have held that these names are given to sons born to the woman not 鈥榓ppointed鈥� by her husband (to bear children).

This, however, is not right; as in that case their exclusion would be secured by the more fact of their being 苍辞苍-叠谤腻丑尘补峁嘺蝉. Hence we conclude that the 鈥�碍耻峁囜笉补鈥� and the 鈥�Golaka鈥� are sons born to the woman 鈥榓ppointed鈥� by her husband.

鈥淏ut how is it that the eons born to the unappointed woman are 苍辞苍-叠谤腻丑尘补峁嘺蝉, while those born to the appointed woman are 叠谤腻丑尘补峁嘺蝉?鈥�

This follows from the fact that, in the definition of castes, the term 鈥榳ife鈥� is mentioned: 鈥業n the case of all castes, one born of the wife of the same caste, etc., etc.鈥� (10.5). This term 鈥�wife,鈥� like the term 鈥�husband,鈥� is a relative one; the term 鈥榳ife,鈥� 鈥�辫补迟苍墨,鈥� again, has been explained (etymologically) as associated with one at sacrificial performances; and no man is entitled to perform.sacrifices in association with another man鈥檚 wife.

鈥淚f that be so, then no 叠谤腻丑尘补峁嘺-丑辞辞诲 should belong to the sons born to the appointed woman, in whose case also the same reason is applicable.鈥�

This question we shall determine under Discourse 10 (verse 5).

Or, both鈥攖he sons of the appointed as well as those of the unappointed woman鈥攎ay be regarded as 鈥槻源遣�-叠谤腻丑尘补峁嘺蝉;鈥� but the difficulty is that, as has been already pointed out above, if these persons are not Br膩hma峁嘺s, then, there being no possibility of these being admitted to dinners, any prohibition of them would be altogether uncalled for. Specially, as their exclusion would be secured by the exclusion of the 鈥榦ut-cast.鈥� Being an 鈥榦ut-cast鈥� consists in falling off from the duties of the Br膩hma峁嘺; and as eating at 艣r膩ddhas is a duty of the Br膩hma峁嘺, such feeding may- not be possible for the out-cast. And yet we find his exclusion asserted in verse 150 above,鈥�(174)

 

Explanatory notes by Ganganath Jha

This verse is quoted in 惭颈迟腻办峁�a谤腻 (on 1.222) as providing the definition of the 鈥�碍耻峁囜笉补鈥� and the 鈥�Golaka鈥�, who have been declared by Y膩j帽avalkya, (1.222) to be unfit to be invited at 艢谤腻诲诲丑补蝉;鈥攊苍 础辫补谤腻谤办补 (p. 445), which adds that this refers to the 碍峁�e迟谤补箩补 son, the other being excluded on the ground of his being a non-Br膩hma峁嘺;鈥攊苍 贬别尘腻诲谤颈 (艢r膩ddha, p. 362);鈥攊苍 艢谤腻诲诲丑补办谤颈测腻办补耻尘耻诲墨 (p. 39);鈥攁nd in 笔谤腻测补艣肠颈迟迟补惫颈惫别办补, (p. 422.)

 

Comparative notes by various authors

(verses 3.174-175)

尝补驳丑耻-艢腻迟腻迟补辫补 (105).鈥擺Reproduces Manu, with slight variations.]

惭补丑腻产丑腻谤补迟补 (13.7.13).鈥摆顿辞.闭.