Significance of Quality assessment
Quality assessment involves evaluating various attributes of products and studies to ensure they meet specified standards. In the context of coins and ornaments, it focuses on their physical properties like color and weight. In scientific research, it assesses the quality of materials and formulations, including herbal products, during various stages such as preparation and storage. Additionally, quality assessment in systematic reviews involves evaluating the methodological rigor of included studies to determine their reliability and credibility, thereby impacting overall research quality.
Synonyms: Quality evaluation, Quality appraisal, Quality inspection, Quality analysis, Quality control, Quality measurement., Quality audit, Quality check, Quality control.
In Dutch: Kwaliteitsbeoordeling; In Finnish: Laatuarviointi; In Spanish: Evaluación de calidad
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Hindu concept of 'Quality assessment'
In Hinduism, Quality assessment involves evaluating attributes like color, weight, and formation of coins and ornaments to ensure they conform to established standards, reflecting the importance of precision and value in sacred and material objects.
From: Kautilya Arthashastra
(1) The process of evaluating the attributes of coins and ornaments, such as their color, weight, and formation, to ensure they meet specified standards.[1]
The concept of Quality assessment in scientific sources
Quality assessment involves evaluating the standards of medicinal formulations, such as Brahmi Ghrita in this study, ensuring they meet the necessary benchmarks for effectiveness and safety in regional medicinal practices.
From: The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences
(1) This is the process of evaluating the quality of the included studies, using specific frameworks to assess the risk of bias in the research.[2] (2) This is the process of evaluating the quality and integrity of the included articles to avoid biases, using the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool.[3] (3) This is the process of evaluating the quality of something, and it was not performed in the research.[4] (4) The quality of the studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers (AAH and SK) according to the Newcastle–Ottawa scale (13).[5] (5) The evaluation process used in this review to ensure that the included studies meet certain methodological standards.[6]