Significance of Opponent's view
In Tibetan Buddhism, Opponent's view encompasses various perspectives that challenge foundational beliefs about cognition, universals, and the nature of perception. This includes arguments against the Vaisheshika framework, claims denying forms of cognition, and critiques related to the absence of indicators in understanding gestures. Additionally, it presents counterarguments regarding the validity of concepts and the authority of the Veda. Similarly, in Vedanta and Nyaya, Opponent's view represents the critiques and challenges posed against established philosophical positions, questioning the interpretations of Brahman and the premises held by various schools of thought.
Synonyms: Dissenting opinion, Contrary opinion
In Dutch: Standpunt van de tegenstander; In Finnish: Vastustajan näkemys; In Spanish: Punto de vista del oponente
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Buddhist concept of 'Opponent's view'
The Opponent's view in Buddhism encompasses various counter-arguments challenging the validity of concepts related to cognition, universals, and the authority of the Veda, highlighting a significant debate on perception, understanding, and the essence of reality.
From: Tattvasangraha [with commentary]
(1) The opponent's view indicates a perspective that contrasts with the author's assertions, highlighting a debate in the understanding of validity.[1] (2) Refers to the contrasting perspective that may challenge the primary assertions about Cognition and Apprehension.[2] (3) The perspective or argument put forth by those who disagree with the main assertion regarding the nature of Universals and the validity of associated concepts.[3] (4) The perspective presented by a counter-argument that challenges the initial claim about the relationship between validity and the absence of defects.[4] (5) The perspective held by those challenging the Vaisheshika framework, particularly regarding the definition and understanding of categories and universals.[5]
Hindu concept of 'Opponent's view'
The Opponent's view in Hinduism challenges conventional interpretations of Brahman, dismisses the text’s significance, counters Advaita Vedanta arguments, and presents opposing philosophical perspectives, particularly those from critics and followers of Sankhya philosophy.
From: Taittiriya Upanishad Bhashya Vartika
(1) The perspective of the critic who claims that the discussed text lacks significance and advocates for its dismissal.[6] (2) The perspective that challenges the conventional understanding of Brahman's place within creation, ultimately leading to a conclusion deemed as rejecting prior interpretations.[7] (3) The perspective or argument that is being challenged or deemed unacceptable in the discussion regarding the nature of the supreme Brahman and conditioned selves.[8] (4) The perspective presented in the text that is countered by arguments supporting the nature of Brahman as bliss.[9] (5) The perspective presented in the text that challenges the idea of Brahman being different from the Self.[10]
From: Brahma Sutras (Shankara Bhashya)
(1) Refers to the perspectives held by those opposing the Vedantic view, particularly the Sankhyas.[11] (2) The philosophical perspective presented in Sutras 12-14 that contradicts the arguments made in Sutras 7-11.[12]
From: Brahma Sutras (Shankaracharya)
(1) This represents the perspective or stance held by an individual who disagrees with a particular viewpoint, and the objection is applicable to this view.[13]