Significance of Mimamsaka argument
The Mimamsaka argument, a key concept in Tibetan Buddhism, encompasses a range of philosophical positions put forward by the Mimamsa school. This includes evaluating the understanding of Vedic texts, questioning their reliability based on the author's characteristics, and critiquing the role of external factors in establishing cognition. The argument also addresses the interpretation of sound and its relationship to sensory experience, emphasizing the significance of Vedic authority and the nature of rituals. Overall, the Mimamsaka argument explores the foundations of knowledge and the validity of Vedic assertions in philosophical discourse.
In Dutch: Mimamsaka argument; In Finnish: Mimamsaka argumentti; In Spanish: Argumento de Mimamsaka
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
Buddhist concept of 'Mimamsaka argument'
The Mimamsaka argument in Buddhism encompasses interpretations of Vedic texts, philosophical reasoning on the nature of reality, cognition, and the relationship between words and meaning, highlighting critiques on permanence, understanding, and validity within sacred texts.
From: Tattvasangraha [with commentary]
(1) The Mimamsaka argument asserts that eternality is signified by the characters of being not produced and not destroyed, which do not require proof.[1] (2) A philosophical position or reasoning method presented to question or analyze assertions regarding comprehension and the nature of words.[2] (3) The reasoning that asserts that a source devoid of defects conducive to falsity is necessary for establishing true cognition.[3] (4) A philosophical discussion presented by the Mimamsaka school regarding the need for corroboration among cognitions.[4] (5) Debates posed by the Mimamsaka school of thought concerning the nature of dissolution and its effects.[5]
Hindu concept of 'Mimamsaka argument'
The Mimamsaka argument in Hinduism emphasizes the significance of obligatory rites within karma and posits that Vedic validity is independent of human origin, advocating for the necessity of rituals and rejecting the finality of destruction.
From: Taittiriya Upanishad Bhashya Vartika
(1) A philosophical debate asserting that evidence exists to support the emergence of positives from negatives.[6] (2) A philosophical standpoint that asserts the importance of obligatory rites in the context of karma, which is critiqued in the text.[7]
From: Vakyapadiya of Bhartrihari
(1) The reasoning and rationale put forth by followers of the Mimamsa philosophy to support their interpretations.[8]