Significance of Balance of power
The concept of Balance of power, as outlined in Arthashastra, emphasizes the importance of maintaining a relative position of strength among allies and adversaries in governance. Historically, it represents the equilibrium in rituals reconciling opposing forces, like good and evil. In international relations, this principle advocates for equal power distribution among nations to ensure stability and prevent dominance by any single entity. The idea extends to political dynamics, promoting a balance in authority and preventing one group from overpowering others, fostering geopolitical stability.
Synonyms: Power distribution, Equilibrium, Parity, Stability, Symmetry, Equality of power, Equipoise
In Finnish: Voimien tasapaino; In Spanish: Equilibrio de fuerzas
The below excerpts are indicatory and do represent direct quotations or translations. It is your responsibility to fact check each reference.
The concept of Balance of power in local and regional sources
The Balance of power is a diplomatic and geopolitical concept emphasizing distribution of authority among states to prevent dominance, historically significant in Europe and relevant in various contexts, including ancient Indian diplomacy and contemporary international relations.
From: Triveni Journal
(1) A concept in ancient Indian diplomacy aimed at maintaining equilibrium among states through various strategic policies.[1] (2) A diplomatic strategy historically employed by Britain to prevent any single state from dominating Europe.[2] (3) The distribution of power among nations that can affect geopolitical stability and security.[3] (4) A political principle aimed at ensuring that no single group dominates the governance structure, promoting equality among different racial and linguistic populations.[4] (5) The political dynamics that Chandragupta significantly influenced, leading to the decline of Buddhism and the rise of Hinduism in India.[5]
From: History of Science in South Asia
(1) Wezler鈥檚 guess that the Asuras鈥� possession of rasayana may result from a mythological demand for a balance of powers between the gods and the Asuras, the so-called anti-gods, appears plausible.[6]